Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 409

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

The Distress and Risk Assessment Method: A Simple Patient Classification to Identify Distress and Evaluate the Risk of Poor Outcome

MAIN, CHRIS J., WOOD, PETER L. R., HOLLIS, SALLY, SPANSWICK, CHRIS C., WADDELL, GORDON·1992·Spine

Abstract

The integration of physical and psychological assessment is frequently problematic. Psychological tests are often cumbersome and difficult to interpret. There would appear to be a need for a simple assessment method that would identify distress and help alert the clinician to the need for a more comprehensive assessment. The Distress and Risk Assessment Method is derived from a simple set of scales validated for use with patients with low-back pain. It offers a simple classification of patients into those showing no psychological distress, those at risk of developing major psychological overlay, and those clearly distressed. Four patient types can be identified on the basis of scores on two short questionnaires. The construction of the Distress and Risk Assessment Method is described and validity data (both clinical and psychological) are presented. The use of the Distress and Risk Assessment Method in the prediction of outcome of treatment is presented, and the paper concludes with general guidelines for its use.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/00007632-199201000-00007

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Metadata

Authors
MAIN, C. J., WOOD, P. L. R., HOLLIS, S., SPANSWICK, C. C., & WADDELL, G.
Venue
Spine
Published
1992-01
Volume
17
Issue
1
Pages
42-52
ISSN
0362-2436 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2061518489
Cited by
409
References
0
FWCI
7.83
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Distress and Risk Assessment Method: A Simple Patient Classification to Identify Distress and Evaluate the Risk of Poor Outcome. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1097/00007632-199201000-00007
The paper
MAIN, C. J., WOOD, P. L. R., HOLLIS, S., SPANSWICK, C. C., & WADDELL, G. (1992). The Distress and Risk Assessment Method: A Simple Patient Classification to Identify Distress and Evaluate the Risk of Poor Outcome. Spine. https://doi.org/10.1097/00007632-199201000-00007

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.