The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Nicotine on the Revascularization of Bone Graft: An Experimental Study in Rabbits
Abstract
STUDY DESIGN: In 24 rabbits, the authors transplanted autologous cancellous bone to the anterior chamber of the eye. Half of the rabbits received nicotine and half received placebo (albumin) from mini-osmotic pumps that were implanted subcutaneously. Revascularization of the bone graft was evaluated postoperatively using ophthalmology slit-lamp and fluorescein angiography, and after sacrifice using microvascular silicone injection and histology. OBJECTIVES: The hypothesis that nicotine inhibits the revascularization of bone graft because of its pharmacologic action on the microvasculature was tested. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Pseudoarthrosis after spinal fusion occurs more frequently in smokers as compared with nonsmokers. METHODS: Observations of the bone graft were made regarding the time after implantation when vessels within the graft were noted and the pattern of these vessels. Revascularization of the graft was graded based on the observed percent area of fluorescence after injection of fluorescein. Serum levels of nicotine were measured weekly. Colored silicone was injected at sacrifice to fix the vasculature of the bone graft. Histologic analysis of undecalcified sections was performed. RESULTS: Nicotine, as compared with placebo, was associated with delayed revascularization within the graft, a smaller percent area of revascularization, and a larger number of grafts showing necrosis. CONCLUSIONS: Nicotine inhibits, but does not prevent, the revascularization of cancellous bone grafts. Inhibition of early revascularization by nicotine is proposed as the pathophysiologic mechanism by which smoking may adversely affect the healing of spinal fusions.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Treatment of critical-sized bone defects: clinical and tissue engineering perspectives
Roddy, E., DeBaun, M. R., Daoud-Gray, A., Yang, Y. P., & Gardner, M. J. (2018) · European Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery & Traumatology · doi:10.1007/s00590-017-2063-0 · Cited by 459
Angiogenesis in Fracture Repair
Glowacki, J. (1998) · Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research · doi:10.1097/00003086-199810001-00010 · Cited by 386
Tomasi, C., Sanz, M., Cecchinato, D., Pjetursson, B., Ferrus, J., Lang, N. P., & Lindhe, J. (2010) · Clinical Oral Implants Research · doi:10.1111/j.1600-0501.2009.01848.x · Cited by 280
Cigarette Smoking Increases Complications Following Fracture: A Systematic Review
Scolaro, J. A., Schenker, M. L., Yannascoli, S., Baldwin, K., Mehta, S., & Ahn, J. (2014) · Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery · doi:10.2106/jbjs.m.00081 · Cited by 279
Smoking as a Predictor of Negative Outcome in Lumbar Spinal Fusion
Andersen, T., Christensen, F. B., Laursen, M., Høy, K., Hansen, E. S., & Bünger, C. (2001) · Spine · doi:10.1097/00007632-200112010-00018 · Cited by 253
Metadata
- Authors
- Daftari, T. K., Whitesides, T. E., Heller, J. G., Goodrich, A. C., McCarey, B. E., & Hutton, W. C.
- Venue
- Spine
- Published
- 1994-04
- Volume
- 19
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 904-911
- ISSN
- 0362-2436 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2014172138
- Cited by
- 218
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 1.85
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Nicotine on the Revascularization of Bone Graft: An Experimental Study in Rabbits. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1097/00007632-199404150-00007
- The paper
- Daftari, T. K., Whitesides, T. E., Heller, J. G., Goodrich, A. C., McCarey, B. E., & Hutton, W. C. (1994). Nicotine on the Revascularization of Bone Graft: An Experimental Study in Rabbits. Spine. https://doi.org/10.1097/00007632-199404150-00007
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.