The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Radiographic Analysis of Sagittal Plane Alignment and Balance in Standing Volunteers and Patients with Low Back Pain Matched for Age, Sex, and Size: A Prospective Controlled Clinical Study
Abstract
STUDY DESIGN: A global and segmental study on standing lateral radiographs of 100 volunteers and 100 patients who had low back pain was undertaken to further define sagittal plane alignment and balance. The volunteer control group and the patient group were matched for age, sex, and size. METHODS: Measurements and determinations made on the standing radiographs included the following: segmental and total lordosis L1-S1 (Cobb method); thoracic kyphosis; thoracic apex; plumbline dropped from the center of C7; and sacral inclination measured between the plumbline and a line drawn along the back of the proximal sacrum. RESULTS: Segmental lordoses were significantly different between each motion segment in both groups. Approximately two-thirds of total lordosis occurred at the bottom two discs, i.e., L4-5 and L5-S1. Total lordosis was significantly less in the patients and was not age- or sex-related in either group. Patients tended to stand with less distal segmental lordosis, but more proximal lumbar lordosis, a more vertical sacrum and, therefore, more hip extension. This may be related to compensation as C7 sagittal plumb lines were comparable in both groups. Both groups had similar thoracic kyphosis. A much higher percentage of smokers was found in the low back pain patient population studied. Because of the significant amount of angulation in the lower lumbar spine, measurement of lordosis should include the L5-S1 motion segment and be done standing to better assess balance. Sacral inclination is a determinate of both standing pelvic rotation and hip extension. It is strongly correlated with segmental and total lordosis in both volunteers and patients. CONCLUSIONS: Definitions of sagittal balance are provided as well as additional sagittal plane data by which to compare corrections and fusions for different spinal disorders.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Mannion, A. F., Knecht, K., Balaban, G., Dvorak, J., & Grob, D. (2004) · European Spine Journal · doi:10.1007/s00586-003-0618-8 · Cited by 396
Comparison of Standing Sagittal Spinal Alignment in Asymptomatic Adolescents and Adults
Vedantam, R., Lenke, L. G., Keeney, J. A., & Bridwell, K. H. (1998) · Spine · doi:10.1097/00007632-199801150-00012 · Cited by 314
Lumbar Lordosis and Pelvic Inclination in Adults With Chronic Low Back Pain
Youdas, J. W., Garrett, T. R., Egan, K. S., & Therneau, T. M. (2000) · Physical Therapy · doi:10.1093/ptj/80.3.261 · Cited by 146
Dolphens, M., Cagnie, B., Coorevits, P., Vanderstraeten, G., Cardon, G., Dʼhooge, R., & Danneels, L. (2012) · Spine · doi:10.1097/brs.0b013e3182408053 · Cited by 88
Nourbakhsh, M. R., Moussavi, S. J., & Salavati, M. (2001) · Journal of Spinal Disorders · doi:10.1097/00002517-200108000-00002 · Cited by 85
Metadata
- Authors
- Jackson, R. P., & McManus, A. C.
- Venue
- Spine
- Published
- 1994-07
- Volume
- 19
- Issue
- Supplement
- Pages
- 1611-1618
- ISSN
- 0362-2436 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2064147774
- Cited by
- 868
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 3.29
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Radiographic Analysis of Sagittal Plane Alignment and Balance in Standing Volunteers and Patients with Low Back Pain Matched for Age, Sex, and Size: A Prospective Controlled Clinical Study. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1097/00007632-199407001-00010
- The paper
- Jackson, R. P., & McManus, A. C. (1994). Radiographic Analysis of Sagittal Plane Alignment and Balance in Standing Volunteers and Patients with Low Back Pain Matched for Age, Sex, and Size: A Prospective Controlled Clinical Study. Spine. https://doi.org/10.1097/00007632-199407001-00010
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.