The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Iliac Crest Bone Graft Harvest Donor Site Morbidity: A Statistical Evaluation
Abstract
STUDY DESIGN: This study analyzed the cause, rate, and risk factors of iliac crest bone graft donor site morbidity. OBJECTIVES: All complications or problems, no matter how small, were sought to develop strategies of prevention. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: A wide range of major, 0.76% (Keller et al) to 25% (Summers et al) and minor complications, 9.4% (Keller et al) to 24% (Summers et al) has been reported. METHODS: A consecutive series of 261 patients, whose bone graft harvest was done by one surgeon, was studied by chart review and a mail survey that was not conducted by the operating surgeon. The survey presented specific open-ended questions designed to uncover any complication/problem, no matter how small. Complications then were categorized as major or minor and subcategorized as acute or chronic. Statistical analysis was done using chi-squared and multiple logistical regression. RESULTS: None of the 261 patients had a severe perioperative complication--e.g., superior gluteal artery injury, sciatic nerve injury, or deep wound infection. None of the 225 patients with long term follow-up (average, 66 months; range, 32-105 months) had a severe late complication--e.g., donor site herniation, meralgia paresthetica, pelvic instability, or fracture. Of the 180 patients meeting the qualifications for statistical analysis, major complications occurred in 18 (10%), only three of which affected function (pain). Minor complications occurred in 70 (39%). CONCLUSIONS: The results indicated that severe complications from iliac crest bone graft harvest can be avoided and major complications affecting functioning are uncommon, but minor complications are common. The findings suggest that procedural refinements of limiting subcutaneous dissection and providing layered tension-free incision closure may improve results.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Giannoudis, P. V., Dinopoulos, H., & Tsiridis, E. (2005) · Injury · doi:10.1016/j.injury.2005.07.029 · Cited by 2,078
The use of bone-graft substitutes in large bone defects: Any specific needs?
Calori, G. M., Mazza, E., Colombo, M., & Ripamonti, C. (2011) · Injury · doi:10.1016/j.injury.2011.06.011 · Cited by 435
Autologous Bone Graft: Properties and Techniques
Pape, H. C., Evans, A., & Kobbe, P. (2010) · Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma · doi:10.1097/bot.0b013e3181cec4a1 · Cited by 417
Psychosocial Aspects of Disabling Musculoskeletal Pain
Vranceanu, A.-M., Barsky, A., & Ring, D. (2009) · The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery-American Volume · doi:10.2106/jbjs.h.01512 · Cited by 304
Bone morphogenetic protein (BMP) for fracture healing in adults
Garrison, K. R., Shemilt, I., Donell, S., Ryder, J. J., Mugford, M., Harvey, I., Song, F., & Alt, V. (2010) · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1002/14651858.cd006950.pub2 · Cited by 278
Metadata
- Authors
- Banwart, J. C., Asher, M. A., & Hassanein, R. S.
- Venue
- Spine
- Published
- 1995-05
- Volume
- 20
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 1055-1060
- ISSN
- 0362-2436 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2035408362
- Cited by
- 1,274
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 6.52
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Iliac Crest Bone Graft Harvest Donor Site Morbidity: A Statistical Evaluation. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1097/00007632-199505000-00012
- The paper
- Banwart, J. C., Asher, M. A., & Hassanein, R. S. (1995). Iliac Crest Bone Graft Harvest Donor Site Morbidity: A Statistical Evaluation. Spine. https://doi.org/10.1097/00007632-199505000-00012
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.