Cited by 435Bone Tissue Engineering MaterialsBone fractures and treatmentsBone Tumor Diagnosis and Treatments

The use of bone-graft substitutes in large bone defects: Any specific needs?

Calori, G.M., Mazza, E., Colombo, M., Ripamonti, C.·2011·Injury

Abstract

Introduction The gold standard for restoring bone defects is still considered to be autologous bone grafting. However, clinical benefits are not guaranteed and donor-site complications and morbidity is not infrequent. Research is on-going for the development of alternative bone substitutes of both biological and synthetic origin. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the type of materials used and their efficacy for the treatment of large bone defects in traumatology and orthopaedic surgery.Materials and method A literature review was carried out of Embase and PubMed databases. Inclusion criteria were articles in English language focusing on the use of bone substitutes in trauma and orthopaedic surgery for the treatment of bone defects and included details on the structural, biological or biomechanical properties of the pure product. Furthermore, based on two clinical challenges, fracture non-union and impaction grafting we elaborated on the use of polytherapy for large bone defects as guided by the diamond concept.Results All the products indicated in this manuscript possess osteoconductive activities but have different resorption times and biomechanical properties. Bone graft substitute materials are used for a wide range of clinical applications even when the level of clinical evidence is low. The size and location of the defect and the local biological and mechanical environment as well as the biomechanical characteristics of the material determine the type of device that can be implanted in a bone defect.Conclusion Proper assessment of the biological and mechanical environment and accurate patient selection are necessary to judge the extent of therapy the injury warrants. A sound understanding of various aspects of biomaterial properties and their relation and influence towards bone healing is of utmost importance. We suggest the application of polytherapy for the treatment of large bone defects and advocate the use of the diamond concept as a guideline.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.injury.2011.06.011

Cites

84 of 84 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Calori, G. M., Mazza, E., Colombo, M., & Ripamonti, C.
Affiliations
University of Milan (IT)
Venue
Injury
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2011-09
Volume
42
Pages
S56-S63
ISSN
0020-1383 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2128128715
Cited by
435
References
84
Citations by year
2026: 22 · 2025: 23 · 2024: 20 · 2023: 25 · 2022: 35 · 2021: 32 · 2020: 36 · 2019: 27 · 2018: 31 · 2017: 45 · 2016: 32 · 2015: 25 · 2014: 29 · 2013: 37 · 2012: 15
FWCI
15.51
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Injury (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Bone Tissue Engineering Materials
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Bone fractures and treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Rheumatology › Bone Tumor Diagnosis and Treatments
Keywords
bone graft substitutes, large bone defects, nonunion, impaction grafting, autologous bone graft, osteoconduction, tissue mechanics, polypharmacy, bone regeneration, trauma surgery, orthopedic surgery
MeSH terms
Absorption, Adult, Bone Cements, Bone Matrix, Bone Regeneration, Calcium Phosphates, Calcium Sulfate, Ceramics, Humans, Male, Transplantation, Autologous, Transplantation, Homologous, Bone Transplantation, Porosity, Treatment Outcome, Fracture Healing, Bone Substitutes, Compressive Strength, Bone Morphogenetic Proteins, Fractures, Bone, Tissue Scaffolds

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review