The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Low Back Pain: A Twentieth Century Health Care Enigma
Abstract
Despite greater knowledge, expertise, and health care resources for spinal pathologies, chronic disability resulting from nonspecific low back pain is rising exponentially in western society. Medical care certainly has not solved the everyday symptom of low back pain and even may be reinforcing and exacerbating the problem. An historic review shows that there is no change in the pathology or prevalence of low back pain: What has changed in our understanding and management. There are striking differences in health care for low back pain in the United States and the United Kingdom, although neither delivers the kind of care recommended by recent evidence-based guidelines. Medical care for low back pain in the United States is specialist-oriented, of high technology, and of high cost, but 40% of American patients seek chiropractic care for low back pain instead. National Health Service care for low back pain in the United Kingdom is underfunded, too little and too late, and 55% of British patients pay for private therapy instead. Despite the different health care systems, treatment availability, and costs, there seems to be little difference in clinical outcomes or the social impact of low back pain in the two countries. There is growing dissatisfaction with health care for low back pain on both sides of the Atlantic. Future health care for patients with nonspecific low back pain should be designed to meet their specific needs.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Waddell, G., Newton, M., Henderson, I., Somerville, D., & Main, C. J. (1993) · Pain · doi:10.1016/0304-3959(93)90127-b · Cited by 3,167
Self-citationOutline of a fear-avoidance model of exaggerated pain perception--I.
Lethem, J., Slade, P. D., Troup, J. D. G., & Bentley, G. (1983) · Behaviour Research and Therapy · doi:10.1016/0005-7967(83)90009-8 · Cited by 1,327
Psychosocial Predictors of Outcome in Acute and Subchronic Low Back Trouble
Burton, A. K., Tillotson, K. M., Main, C. J., & Hollis, S. (1995) · Spine · doi:10.1097/00007632-199503150-00014 · Cited by 700
Cited by
Fear-avoidance and its consequences in chronic musculoskeletal pain: a state of the art.
Vlaeyen, J. W. S., & Linton, S. J. (2000) · Pain · doi:10.1016/s0304-3959(99)00242-0 · Cited by 4,931
A review of psychological risk factors in back and neck pain
Linton, S. J. (2000) · Spine · doi:10.1097/00007632-200005010-00017 · Cited by 1,776
Multidisciplinary rehabilitation for chronic low back pain: systematic review
Guzmán, J., Esmail, R., Karjalainen, K., Malmivaara, A., Irvin, E., & Bombardier, C. (2001) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.322.7301.1511 · Cited by 941
Schmidt-Wilcke, T., Leinisch, E., Gänbauer, S., Draganski, B., Bogdahn, U., Altmeppen, J., & May, A. (2006) · Pain · doi:10.1016/j.pain.2006.05.004 · Cited by 413
Synnott, A., O’Keeffe, M., Bunzli, S., Dankaerts, W., O'Sullivan, P., & O'Sullivan, K. (2015) · Journal of Physiotherapy · doi:10.1016/j.jphys.2015.02.016 · Cited by 412
Metadata
- Authors
- Waddell, G.
- Venue
- Spine
- Published
- 1996-12
- Volume
- 21
- Issue
- 24
- Pages
- 2820-2825
- ISSN
- 0362-2436 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2093752945
- Cited by
- 551
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 10.79
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Low Back Pain: A Twentieth Century Health Care Enigma. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1097/00007632-199612150-00002
- The paper
- Waddell, G. (1996). Low Back Pain: A Twentieth Century Health Care Enigma. Spine. https://doi.org/10.1097/00007632-199612150-00002
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.