Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 508

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 16 of the 16 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The Bagby and Kuslich Method of Lumbar Interbody Fusion: History, Techniques, and 2-Year Follow-up Results of a United States Prospective, Multicenter Trial

Kuslich, Stephen D., Ulstrom, Cynthia L., Griffith, Steven L., Ahern, James W., Dowdle, John D.·1998·Spine

Abstract

STUDY DESIGN: A prospective, multicenter trial of the Bagby and Kuslich method of lumbar interbody stabilization for chronic discogenic low back pain, with follow-up evaluation at 3 months, 6 months, and yearly thereafter, with independent radiographic analysis. OBJECTIVES: To report the history of development, the surgical techniques, and results of the Bagby and Kuslich method when used to manage discogenic pain of the lumbar spine in humans. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Disabling chronic low back pain frequently is resistant to conservative management. The "Bagby Basket" effectively has fused the equine and baboon spine. The results of biomechanical and animal studies performed over the last 20 years have suggested that a similar but improved design--the Bagby and Kuslich device--would be useful in stabilizing the human spine. METHODS: From 1992 to 1995, 947 patients with chronic discogenic low back pain were treated by Bagby and Kuslich interbody fusion in a strict, multicenter, prospective clinical trial by using either the open anterior or open posterior approach. The study involved 42 surgeons at 19 medical centers. The authors of the current report analyzed the fusion rates, pain relief, functional status, and complications occurring in patients who underwent long-term follow-up observation. RESULTS: The Bagby and Kuslich method is safe and effective when compared with methods described in previous reports of posterior and anterior lumbar interbody arthrodesis performed by using bone graft alone. Fusion occurred in 91% of patients at 24 months after surgery, and pain was eliminated or reduced in 84%. Function was improved in 91%. There were no device-related deaths, cases of major paralyses, device failures, or deep infections. CONCLUSIONS: Carefully selected middle-aged patients with chronic low back pain secondary to degenerative disc disease can be treated effectively and safely by skilled surgeons using the Bagby and Kuslich device for one- and two-level interbody fusion.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/00007632-199806010-00019

Cites

16 of 16 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 16 references

Cited by

See all 508

Metadata

Authors
Kuslich, S. D., Ulstrom, C. L., Griffith, S. L., Ahern, J. W., & Dowdle, J. D.
Venue
Spine
Published
1998-06
Volume
23
Issue
11
Pages
1267-1278
ISSN
0362-2436 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2143949977
Cited by
508
References
16
FWCI
17.36
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Bagby and Kuslich Method of Lumbar Interbody Fusion: History, Techniques, and 2-Year Follow-up Results of a United States Prospective, Multicenter Trial. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1097/00007632-199806010-00019
The paper
Kuslich, S. D., Ulstrom, C. L., Griffith, S. L., Ahern, J. W., & Dowdle, J. D. (1998). The Bagby and Kuslich Method of Lumbar Interbody Fusion: History, Techniques, and 2-Year Follow-up Results of a United States Prospective, Multicenter Trial. Spine. https://doi.org/10.1097/00007632-199806010-00019

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.