The DOI matches its Crossref record.
THE INCIDENCE AND IMPACT OF EARLY REJECTION EPISODES ON GRAFT OUTCOME IN RECIPIENTS OF FIRST CADAVER KIDNEY TRANSPLANTS
Abstract
The objective of this study was to define the incidence and significance of acute rejection occurring in the first year following transplantation. The influence of contemporary induction immunosuppression on rejection, as well as the effect of rejection on graft and patient loss, renal function, and maintenance immunosuppression during the first year in 110 recipients of first cadaver renal transplants were analyzed. All patients received CsA, Aza, and prednisone for 30 days with withdrawal of Aza at 30 days and then prednisone at 105 days; 57 patients were prospectively randomized to receive ALG (Merieux) until serum creatinine was less than 300 mumol/L. Short-term ALG administration did not influence the incidence, severity, nature, or outcome of rejection episodes. Fifty-five (50%) patients had at least 1 rejection in the first 90 days. All patients with delayed graft function and 7/8 (88%) sensitized patients (current PRA greater than 50%) had at least 1 rejection episode; 71% (n = 35) of all rejection episodes occurred in the first 30 days posttransplant. Patients rejection free at 90 days remained rejection free the entire first year. Graft loss was 18% for rejections in the first month, 13% for rejections occurring later (P = NS); 20% (n = 11) of patients had a second rejection and 1% (n = 2) had a third rejection. The risk of graft loss was 9% with a first rejection, 38% with a second rejection, and 50% with a third rejection. Of 12 (22%) rejections that were steroid resistant, 10 (83%) were reversed with OKT3. One-year graft survival for patients without rejection, with steroid-sensitive rejection, and with steroid-resistant rejection was 96%, 88% (P = ns), and 58% (P less than 0.001), respectively; 1 year SCr was 168 +/- 93, 196 +/- 77 (P = ns), and 268 +/- 96 microMol/L (P less than 0.05), respectively. Patients free of rejection and with stable renal function continued to do well on maintenance CsA monotherapy, and they were more likely to be on CsA monotherapy than those with rejection episodes (P less than 0.01).
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
European Mycophenolate Mofetil Cooperative Study Group (1995) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(95)92534-1 · Cited by 927
MacDonald, A. S. (2001) · Transplantation · doi:10.1097/00007890-200101270-00019 · Cited by 621
Self-citationLi, B., Hartono, C., Ding, R., Sharma, V. K., Ramaswamy, R., Qian, B., Serur, D., Mouradian, J., Schwartz, J. E., & Suthanthiran, M. (2001) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm200103293441301 · Cited by 599
Fulton, B., & Markham, A. (1996) · Drugs · doi:10.2165/00003495-199651020-00007 · Cited by 301
Long-Term Efficacy and Safety of Cyclosporine in Renal-Transplant Recipients
Burke, J. F., Pirsch, J. D., Ramos, E. L., Salomon, D. R., Stablein, D. M., Van Buren, D. H., & West, J. C. (1994) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm199408113310604 · Cited by 264
Metadata
- Authors
- GULANIKAR, A. C., MACDONALD, A. S., SUNGURTEKIN, U., & BELITSKY, P.
- Venue
- Transplantation
- Published
- 1992-02
- Volume
- 53
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 323-328
- ISSN
- 0041-1337 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2010390181
- Cited by
- 187
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 6.68
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: THE INCIDENCE AND IMPACT OF EARLY REJECTION EPISODES ON GRAFT OUTCOME IN RECIPIENTS OF FIRST CADAVER KIDNEY TRANSPLANTS. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1097/00007890-199202010-00013
- The paper
- GULANIKAR, A. C., MACDONALD, A. S., SUNGURTEKIN, U., & BELITSKY, P. (1992). THE INCIDENCE AND IMPACT OF EARLY REJECTION EPISODES ON GRAFT OUTCOME IN RECIPIENTS OF FIRST CADAVER KIDNEY TRANSPLANTS. Transplantation. https://doi.org/10.1097/00007890-199202010-00013
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.