Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 264

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 9 of the 9 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Long-Term Efficacy and Safety of Cyclosporine in Renal-Transplant Recipients

Open access
Burke, James F., Pirsch, John D., Ramos, Eleanor L., Salomon, Daniel R., Stablein, Donald M., Van Buren, David H., West, John C.·1994·New England Journal of Medicine

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND METHODS: The safety of long-term immunosuppression with cyclosporine in renal-transplant recipients is not well understood. This drug may cause a progressive toxic nephropathy, but it also preserves renal function because it prevents rejection. To determine the effect of cyclosporine on renal function and graft rejection, we conducted a retrospective analysis of data on 1663 renal-transplant recipients at six centers. RESULTS: The rate of graft survival was 78 percent (median follow-up, 36 months). Grafts were was lost in 279 patients (17 percent), mostly because of acute rejection (68 patients) or chronic graft dysfunction that was unresponsive to a reduction in the dose of cyclosporine (125 patients); 92 patients died with functioning grafts. The median change in the serum creatinine concentration in all patients after transplantation was less than 0.001 mg per deciliter per month (< 0.09 mumol per liter per month). Patients who had episodes of rejection had decreased rates of long-term graft function and survival. Eight percent of patients with functioning grafts at one year had first episodes of rejection more than one year after transplantation. These late first rejections were associated with noncompliance with therapy (in 34 percent), blood cyclosporine concentrations that were marginally lower than those of patients who had no episodes of rejection, and a low rate of successful reversal of rejection (77 percent, vs. 97 percent in patients with rejection during the first year; P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The majority of renal-transplant patients tolerate long-term cyclosporine therapy without evidence of progressive toxic nephropathy. Graft failure is most often due to rejection.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1056/nejm199408113310604

Cites

9 of 9 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 9 references

Cited by

See all 264

Metadata

Authors
Burke, J. F., Pirsch, J. D., Ramos, E. L., Salomon, D. R., Stablein, D. M., Van Buren, D. H., & West, J. C.
Venue
New England Journal of Medicine
Published
1994-08-11
Volume
331
Issue
6
Pages
358-363
ISSN
  • 0028-4793 (ISSN-L)
  • 1533-4406
OpenAlex
W2319735235
Cited by
264
References
9
FWCI
18.47
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Long-Term Efficacy and Safety of Cyclosporine in Renal-Transplant Recipients. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1056/nejm199408113310604
The paper
Burke, J. F., Pirsch, J. D., Ramos, E. L., Salomon, D. R., Stablein, D. M., Van Buren, D. H., & West, J. C. (1994). Long-Term Efficacy and Safety of Cyclosporine in Renal-Transplant Recipients. New England Journal of Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1056/nejm199408113310604

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.