Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 353

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

EARLY VERSUS LATE ACUTE RENAL ALLOGRAFT REJECTION: IMPACT ON CHRONIC REJECTION

BASADONNA, G. P., MATAS, A. J., GILLINGHAM, K. J., PAYNE, W. D., DUNN, D. L., SUTHERLAND, D. E. R., GORES, P. F., GRUESSNER, R. W. G., NAJARIAN, J. S.·1993·Transplantation

Abstract

We studied the effect of acute renal allograft rejection and its timing on the development of chronic rejection and subsequent graft loss. Between January 1, 1987 and April 30, 1991, 424 patients at the University of Minnesota received a primary kidney transplant (minimum follow-up, 1 year). Patients were subdivided by donor source, presence or absence of acute rejection, and the timing of acute rejection onset (early, < or = 60 days vs. late, > 60 days post-transplant). For living donor (LD) transplant recipients (n = 219), the incidence of chronic rejection is 0.8% in those who had no acute rejection (n = 130), 20% in those with acute rejection < or = 60 days (n = 59) (P < 0.001 vs. no acute rejection), and 43% in those with acute rejection > 60 days (n = 30) (P < 0.001 vs. no acute rejection, P = 0.04 vs. early acute rejection). For cadaver (CAD) transplant recipients (n = 205), the incidence of chronic rejection is 0% in those who had no acute rejection (n = 109), 36% in those with acute rejection < or = 60 days (n = 69) (P < 0.001 vs. no acute rejection), and 63% in those with acute rejection > 60 days (n = 27) (P < 0.001 vs. no acute rejection, P = 0.03 vs. early acute rejection). For both LD and CAD recipients, no grafts have been lost to chronic rejection among those who did not first have at least 1 acute rejection episode. In contrast, 23 patients with acute rejection have had graft loss to chronic rejection. For both LD and CAD recipients, those with > 1 acute rejection episode had significantly more chronic rejection than those with only 1 rejection (P < 0.05). There was no significant difference in the incidence of chronic rejection based on whether the first acute rejection episode was steroid resistant or steroid responsive. We conclude that acute rejection is strongly related to the development of biopsy-proven chronic rejection and subsequent graft loss. Patients undergoing their first acute rejection episode > 60 days (vs. < or = 60 days) have an increased incidence of chronic rejection.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/00007890-199305000-00007

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 353

Metadata

Authors
BASADONNA, G. P., MATAS, A. J., GILLINGHAM, K. J., PAYNE, W. D., DUNN, D. L., SUTHERLAND, D. E. R., GORES, P. F., GRUESSNER, R. W. G., & NAJARIAN, J. S.
Venue
Transplantation
Published
1993-05
Volume
55
Issue
5
Pages
993-995
ISSN
0041-1337 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2009236577
Cited by
353
References
0
FWCI
14.11
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: EARLY VERSUS LATE ACUTE RENAL ALLOGRAFT REJECTION: IMPACT ON CHRONIC REJECTION. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1097/00007890-199305000-00007
The paper
BASADONNA, G. P., MATAS, A. J., GILLINGHAM, K. J., PAYNE, W. D., DUNN, D. L., SUTHERLAND, D. E. R., GORES, P. F., GRUESSNER, R. W. G., & NAJARIAN, J. S. (1993). EARLY VERSUS LATE ACUTE RENAL ALLOGRAFT REJECTION: IMPACT ON CHRONIC REJECTION. Transplantation. https://doi.org/10.1097/00007890-199305000-00007

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.