Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 324

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 10 of the 10 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

LIVER REGENERATION AND FUNCTION IN DONOR AND RECIPIENT AFTER RIGHT LOBE ADULT TO ADULT LIVING DONOR LIVER TRANSPLANTATION12

Marcos, Amadeo, Fisher, Robert A., Ham, John M., Shiffman, Mitchell L., Sanyal, Arun J., Luketic, Velimir A. C., Sterling, Richard K., Fulcher, Ann S., Posner, Marc P.·2000·Transplantation

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Regeneration of the liver to a predetermined size after resection or transplantation is a well described phenomenon, but the time course over which these events occur has not been well defined. It is not clear how initial liver mass, reperfusion, immunosuppression, or steatosis influence this process. METHODS: Liver regeneration was assessed prospectively by volumetric magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in living right lobe liver donors and the recipients of these grafts. Imaging was performed at regular intervals through 60 days after resection/transplantation, and liver mass was determined. Liver function tests and synthetic function were monitored throughout the study period in donors and recipients of these grafts as well as recipients of cadaveric grafts. RESULTS: MRI consistently overestimated liver mass by a mean of 45 g (+/-65) (range 10-123). Donor liver mass increased by 101%, 110%, 115%, and 144% at 7, 14, 30, and 60 days after resection, respectively. Recipient liver mass increased by 87,101, 119, and 99% at 7, 14, 30, and 60 days after transplantation, respectively. Steatosis did not influence the degree of regeneration or graft function, nor was there a functional difference between grafts of >1% graft to recipient body weight ratio or <1%. CONCLUSIONS: MRI accurately determines right lobe mass. Most liver regeneration occurs in the 1st week after resection or transplantation, and the time course does not differ significantly in donors or recipients. The mass of the graft or remnant segment affects the duration of the regeneration process, with a smaller initial liver mass prolonging the course. Steatosis of <30% had no bearing on liver function or regeneration and, therefore, should not be an absolute criterion for exclusion of donors. A calculated graft to recipient body weight ratio of 0.8% is adequate for right lobe living donor liver transplantation.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/00007890-200004150-00028

Cites

10 of 10 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 10 references

Cited by

See all 324

Metadata

Authors
Marcos, A., Fisher, R. A., Ham, J. M., Shiffman, M. L., Sanyal, A. J., Luketic, V. A. C., Sterling, R. K., Fulcher, A. S., & Posner, M. P.
Venue
Transplantation
Published
2000-04
Volume
69
Issue
7
Pages
1375-1379
ISSN
0041-1337 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1968139968
Cited by
324
References
10
FWCI
27.31
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: LIVER REGENERATION AND FUNCTION IN DONOR AND RECIPIENT AFTER RIGHT LOBE ADULT TO ADULT LIVING DONOR LIVER TRANSPLANTATION12. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1097/00007890-200004150-00028
The paper
Marcos, A., Fisher, R. A., Ham, J. M., Shiffman, M. L., Sanyal, A. J., Luketic, V. A. C., Sterling, R. K., Fulcher, A. S., & Posner, M. P. (2000). LIVER REGENERATION AND FUNCTION IN DONOR AND RECIPIENT AFTER RIGHT LOBE ADULT TO ADULT LIVING DONOR LIVER TRANSPLANTATION12. Transplantation. https://doi.org/10.1097/00007890-200004150-00028

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.