The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Donor characteristics associated with reduced graft survival: an approach to expanding the pool of kidney donors1
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Availability of cadaveric kidneys for transplantation is far below the growing need, leading to longer waiting time and more deaths while waiting. METHODS: Using national data from 1995 to 2000, we evaluated graft survival by donor characteristics and the rate of discard of retrieved organs, with the goal of increasing use of kidneys that are associated with increased risk of graft failure, that is, expanded donor kidneys. RESULTS: Cox models identified four donor factors that independently predicted significantly higher relative risk of graft loss compared with a low-risk group. These factors included donor age, cerebrovascular accident as the cause of death, renal insufficiency (serum creatinine >1.5 mg/dL), and history of hypertension. Expanded donor kidneys were defined as those with relative risk of graft loss greater than 1.70 and included all donors aged 60 years and older and those aged 50 to 59 years with at least two of the other three conditions (cerebrovascular cause of death, renal insufficiency, hypertension). The expanded donor group accounted for 14.8% of transplanted kidneys. Among organs procured from expanded donors, 38% were discarded versus 9% for all other kidneys. The risk of graft loss of expanded donor kidneys was increased in both older and younger recipients but to a greater extent in those recipients older than 50 years. CONCLUSION: By identifying donor factors associated with graft failure, these analyses may help to expand the number of transplanted kidneys by increasing the utilization of retrieved cadaveric kidneys.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
A Comprehensive Risk Quantification Score for Deceased Donor Kidneys: The Kidney Donor Risk Index
Rao, P. S., Schaubel, D. E., Guidinger, M. K., Andreoni, K. A., Wolfe, R. A., Merion, R. M., Port, F. K., & Sung, R. S. (2009) · Transplantation · doi:10.1097/tp.0b013e3181ac620b · Cited by 1,079
Self-citationImproving liver allocation: MELD and PELD
Freeman, R. B., Wiesner, R. H., Roberts, J. P., McDiarmid, S., Dykstra, D. M., & Merion, R. M. (2004) · American Journal of Transplantation · doi:10.1111/j.1600-6135.2004.00403.x · Cited by 270
Self-citationthe Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, F. P. U. A. G. I., Aceto, P., Perilli, V., Luca, E., Salerno, M. P., Punzo, G., Ceaichisciuc, I., Cataldo, A., Lai, C., Citterio, F., et al. (2019) · Experimental and Clinical Transplantation · doi:10.6002/ect.2018.0225 · Cited by 22
Cannon, R. M., Brock, G. N., Marvin, M. R., Slakey, D. P., & Buell, J. F. (2012) · American Journal of Transplantation · doi:10.1111/j.1600-6143.2012.04091.x · Cited by 13
Metadata
- Authors
- Port, F. K., Bragg-Gresham, J. L., Metzger, R. A., Dykstra, D. M., Gillespie, B. W., Young, E. W., Delmonico, F. L., Wynn, J. J., Merion, R. M., Wolfe, R. A., & Held, P. J.
- Venue
- Transplantation
- Published
- 2002-11
- Volume
- 74
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 1281-1286
- ISSN
- 0041-1337 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2043309772
- Cited by
- 796
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 14.33
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Donor characteristics associated with reduced graft survival: an approach to expanding the pool of kidney donors1. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1097/00007890-200211150-00014
- The paper
- Port, F. K., Bragg-Gresham, J. L., Metzger, R. A., Dykstra, D. M., Gillespie, B. W., Young, E. W., Delmonico, F. L., Wynn, J. J., Merion, R. M., Wolfe, R. A., & Held, P. J. (2002). Donor characteristics associated with reduced graft survival: an approach to expanding the pool of kidney donors1. Transplantation. https://doi.org/10.1097/00007890-200211150-00014
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.