Cited by 87Digital Radiography and Breast ImagingPhytoestrogen effects and researchEstrogen and related hormone effects

Mammographic densities in a one-year isoflavone intervention

Maskarinec, G, Williams, A E, Carlin, L·2003·European Journal of Cancer Prevention

Abstract

The estrogenic and antiestrogenic effects of isoflavones, phytoestrogens contained in soy foods, have been proposed as mechanisms for the possible involvement of soy products in the development of breast cancer. We investigated the hypothesis that isoflavones reduce mammographic density, a predictor of breast cancer risk. We conducted a double-blind randomized trial in premenopausal women who received a daily 100 mg isoflavone supplement or a placebo over 12 months. Compliance with the study regimen was confirmed by urinary isoflavones and tablet counts. We used a computer-assisted method to measure mammographic density and paired t-tests to assess changes in mammographic characteristics from baseline to follow-up mammogram. Complete sets of mammograms were available for 30 women. The two groups differed by age and mammographic density at baseline, but were similar in body weight and nutritional intakes. We detected no significant changes either in the size of the dense areas or in the per cent densities. A non-significant decrease in breast area among intervention group subjects was probably the result of methodological issues in comparing mammograms taken under different conditions. In conclusion, our findings do not support the hypothesis that isoflavones decrease mammographic density during a one-year intervention. Although this exploratory study had limited power, it appears that isoflavones do not exert an estrogenic effect similar to hormone replacement therapy on mamm…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/00008469-200304000-00011

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • None of the RCTs assessing endometrial thickness, mammographic density or changes, nipple aspirate volume, PAP results and uterine fibroid growth, or vaginal cytology found any evidence of negative impact from soy compared to control.

    “None of the studies assessing endometrial thickness [132,136,155], mammographic density or mammographic changes [66,132,136,137,144,146], nipple aspirate volume [134], PAP results and uterine fibroid growth [132], or vaginal cytology [155] found any evidence of negative impact from soy compared to the control group.”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Maskarinec, G., Williams, A. E., & Carlin, L.
Corresponding author
Maskarinec, G
Venue
European Journal of Cancer Prevention
Published
2003-04
Volume
12
Issue
2
Pages
165-169
ISSN
0959-8278 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1969374932
Cited by
87
References
0
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 4 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 5
FWCI
6.97
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • European Journal of Cancer Prevention (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Pharmavite
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Digital Radiography and Breast Imaging
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pathology and Forensic Medicine › Phytoestrogen effects and research
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Estrogen and related hormone effects
Keywords
isoflavones, phytoestrogens, breast density, breast cancer risk, premenopausal women, estrogenic effects, antiestrogenic effects, urinary isoflavone excretion
MeSH terms
Adult, Breast Neoplasms, Double-Blind Method, Female, Humans, Isoflavones, Mammography, Phytotherapy, Middle Aged, Glycine max, Treatment Outcome, Dietary Supplements

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review