The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Individual reactivity to novelty predicts probability of amphetamine self-administration
Abstract
The present study demonstrates a relationship between individual responses to environmental activation, such as novelty, and propensity to acquire amphetamine self-administration. Locomotor activity cumulated over 2 h of exposure to a circular corridor was a stable and novelty-dependent feature of behaviour in individual rats. The differences between subjects in this behaviour were maintained over two trials at 1 months intervals, but disappeared over 4 days when the animals were tested daily, i.e. when the environment was no longer novel. The subjects with the higher locomotor response to novelty (HR group) also showed a higher propensity to acquire amphetamine self-administration, while the subjects with the lower response to novelty (LR group) did not acquire self-administration over 7 days of testing. Differences in self-administration of HR animals could not be accounted for by differences in exploratory behaviour. Thus, HR animals did not show higher investigative responses in a hole exploration test. Animals with the higher locomotor response to novelty also showed a greater release of corticosterone in the same environment. Since dopaminergic (DA) neurons are activated by both amphetamine and novelty, it is possible that differences in the propensity to acquire amphetamine self-administration may be accounted for by differences in the activity of DA neurons.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Drug dependence: stress and dysregulation of brain reward pathways
Kreek, M. J., & Koob, G. F. (1998) · Drug and Alcohol Dependence · doi:10.1016/s0376-8716(98)00064-7 · Cited by 696
The dynorphin/kappa opioid system as a modulator of stress-induced and pro-addictive behaviors
Bruchas, M. R., Land, B. B., & Chavkin, C. (2010) · Brain Research · doi:10.1016/j.brainres.2009.08.062 · Cited by 544
Perry, J. L., Larson, E. B., German, J. P., Madden, G. J., & Carroll, M. E. (2005) · Psychopharmacology · doi:10.1007/s00213-004-1994-4 · Cited by 388
Brake, W. G., Zhang, T. Y., Diorio, J., Meaney, M. J., & Gratton, A. (2004) · European Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1111/j.1460-9568.2004.03286.x · Cited by 342
Response to novelty predicts the locomotor and nucleus accumbens dopamine response to cocaine
Hooks, M. S., Jones, G. H., Smith, A. D., Neill, D. B., & Justice, J. B. (1991) · Synapse · doi:10.1002/syn.890090206 · Cited by 293
Metadata
- Authors
- Piazza, P. V., Deminèiere, J.-M., Maccari, S., Mormède, P., Moal, M. L., & Simon, H.
- Venue
- Behavioural Pharmacology
- Published
- 1990
- Volume
- 1
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 339-346
- ISSN
- 0955-8810 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2032955802
- Cited by
- 253
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 2.74
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Individual reactivity to novelty predicts probability of amphetamine self-administration. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1097/00008877-199000140-00007
- The paper
- Piazza, P. V., Deminèiere, J.-M., Maccari, S., Mormède, P., Moal, M. L., & Simon, H. (1990). Individual reactivity to novelty predicts probability of amphetamine self-administration. Behavioural Pharmacology. https://doi.org/10.1097/00008877-199000140-00007
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.