Cited by 113Smoking Behavior and CessationNicotinic Acetylcholine Receptors StudyNeurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior

Effects of acute and chronic nicotine on impulsive choice in rats

Dallery, J., Locey, M. L.·2005·Behavioural Pharmacology

Abstract

Impulsive choice, or preference for small immediate reinforcers over large delayed reinforcers, has been associated with cigarette smoking. The direct effects of nicotine on impulsive choice in laboratory animals are unknown. We examined the effects of acute and chronic nicotine injections, and the termination of injections, on impulsive choice in rats. Five rats made choices between a one- and a three-pellet reinforcer in a discrete trials procedure. The delay to the smaller reinforcer was always 1 s. A computer adjusted the delay to the larger reinforcer until the pattern of choices reflected indifference between the two alternatives. We assessed the effects of acute and chronic nicotine (vehicle, 0.03, 0.1, 0.3 and 1.0 mg/kg nicotine). The latency to make the first response of the session increased under the acute 1.0 mg/kg dose. There were no consistent differences in the effects of acute and chronic nicotine on response latency and lever pressing during the delays between choices. Acute injections of nicotine dose-dependently increased impulsive responding. After chronic injections, impulsive responding was increased equivalently regardless of dose, and it was increased even in the absence of nicotine. After drug injections were terminated, behavior remained impulsive for about 30 drug-free sessions, and then responding gradually returned to baseline levels. The results suggest that increases in impulsive choice were not due to anorectic effects, response biases or changes in conditioned reinforcement. Nicotine may have decreased the value of delayed reinforcers. Chronic nicotine exposure produced long-lasting but reversible increases in impulsive choice.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/00008877-200502000-00002

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 33 · Cited by 113

Authors
Dallery, J., & Locey, M. L.
Affiliations
University of Florida (US)
Corresponding author
Dallery, J.
Venue
Behavioural Pharmacology
Published
2005-02
Volume
16
Issue
1
Pages
15-23
ISSN
0955-8810 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1988038665
Cited by
113
References
33
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 15 · 2012: 10
FWCI
1.39
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Behavioural Pharmacology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Smoking Behavior and Cessation
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Nicotinic Acetylcholine Receptors Study
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
Keywords
nicotine, impulsive choice, impulsivity, chronic nicotine exposure, response latency, cigarette smoking, rats
MeSH terms
Animals, Conditioning, Operant, Dose-Response Relationship, Drug, Impulsive Behavior, Male, Nicotine, Reinforcement Schedule, Nicotinic Agonists, Rats, Long-Evans, Rats

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review