Cited by 409Healthcare Education and Workforce IssuesNursing education and managementInnovative Education and Learning Practices

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

From beginner to expert: Gaining a differentiated clinical world in critical care nursing

Benner, Patricia, Tanner, Christine, Chesla, Catherine·1992·Advances in Nursing Science

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to further explicate the Dreyfus Model of Skill Acquisition in the practice of critical care nursing. For this analysis data were used from a sample of 105 nurses practicing in the adult, pediatric, and newborn intensive care units of eight hospitals in three metropolitan areas. The data were composed of group interviews in which nurses gave narrative accounts of exemplars from their practice and close observations and intensive personal history interviews of a subsample of nurses. Two interrelated aspects were found to distinguish four levels of practice, from advanced beginner through expert. First, practitioners at different levels of skill literally live in different clinical worlds, noticing and responding to different directives for action. Second, a sense of agency is determined by one's clinical world and shows up as an expression of responsibility for what happens with the patient.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/00012272-199203000-00005

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • No studies relating to expertise have been undertaken, in Australia or elsewhere, which focus on nephrology nursing.

    “While studies relating to expertise have been undertaken in a range of nursing contexts and specialties (see for example Benner et al 1992, Greenwood & King 1995, Cioffi & Markham 1997, King & Macleod Clark 2002, Reischman & Yarandi 2002) to date none have been undertaken, in Australia or elsewhere, which focus on nephrology nursing.”

Citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Benner, P., Tanner, C., & Chesla, C.
Affiliations
Oregon Health & Science University (US)
Venue
Advances in Nursing Science
Published
1992-03
Volume
14
Issue
3
Pages
13-28
ISSN
0161-9268 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2315587423
Cited by
409
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 15 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 12 · 2014: 14 · 2013: 18 · 2012: 11
FWCI
45.42
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Advances in Nursing Science (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Leadership and Management › Healthcare Education and Workforce Issues
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Research and Theory › Nursing education and management
  • Social Sciences › Education › Innovative Education and Learning Practices
Keywords
Dreyfus model of skill acquisition, critical care nursing, nursing expertise, novice to expert, intensive care unit, nursing practice
MeSH terms
Clinical Competence, Critical Care, Cues, Family, Holistic Health, Humans, Interprofessional Relations, Learning, Models, Psychological, Nursing Process, Nursing Records, Nursing Staff, Hospital, Self Concept, Semantics, Nursing Methodology Research

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review