The DOI matches its Crossref record.
From beginner to expert: Gaining a differentiated clinical world in critical care nursing
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to further explicate the Dreyfus Model of Skill Acquisition in the practice of critical care nursing. For this analysis data were used from a sample of 105 nurses practicing in the adult, pediatric, and newborn intensive care units of eight hospitals in three metropolitan areas. The data were composed of group interviews in which nurses gave narrative accounts of exemplars from their practice and close observations and intensive personal history interviews of a subsample of nurses. Two interrelated aspects were found to distinguish four levels of practice, from advanced beginner through expert. First, practitioners at different levels of skill literally live in different clinical worlds, noticing and responding to different directives for action. Second, a sense of agency is determined by one's clinical world and shows up as an expression of responsibility for what happens with the patient.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
No studies relating to expertise have been undertaken, in Australia or elsewhere, which focus on nephrology nursing.
“While studies relating to expertise have been undertaken in a range of nursing contexts and specialties (see for example Benner et al 1992, Greenwood & King 1995, Cioffi & Markham 1997, King & Macleod Clark 2002, Reischman & Yarandi 2002) to date none have been undertaken, in Australia or elsewhere, which focus on nephrology nursing.”
From The acquisition and exercise of nephrology nursing expertise: a grounded theory study (2006) · cites this paper as Benner et al 1992
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The acquisition and exercise of nephrology nursing expertise: a grounded theory study
Bonner, A., & Greenwood, J. (2006) · Journal of Clinical Nursing · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2702.2006.01361.x · Cited by 27
Sacco, T. L., Stapleton, M. F., & Ingersoll, G. L. (2009) · Critical Care Nurse · doi:10.4037/ccn2009265 · Cited by 14
Metadata
- Authors
- Benner, P., Tanner, C., & Chesla, C.
- Affiliations
- Oregon Health & Science University (US)
- ORCID
- Chesla, Catherine
- Venue
- Advances in Nursing Science
- Published
- 1992-03
- Volume
- 14
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 13-28
- ISSN
- 0161-9268 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2315587423
- Cited by
- 409
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 6 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 15 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 12 · 2014: 14 · 2013: 18 · 2012: 11
- FWCI
- 45.42
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Advances in Nursing Science (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Nursing › Leadership and Management › Healthcare Education and Workforce Issues
- Health Sciences › Nursing › Research and Theory › Nursing education and management
- Social Sciences › Education › Innovative Education and Learning Practices
- Keywords
- Dreyfus model of skill acquisition, critical care nursing, nursing expertise, novice to expert, intensive care unit, nursing practice
- MeSH terms
- Clinical Competence, Critical Care, Cues, Family, Holistic Health, Humans, Interprofessional Relations, Learning, Models, Psychological, Nursing Process, Nursing Records, Nursing Staff, Hospital, Self Concept, Semantics, Nursing Methodology Research
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review