The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The epidemiology of epilepsy revisited
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Epidemiology is the study of the dynamics of a medical condition in a population. There are many shortcomings in the understanding of the epidemiology of epilepsy mostly caused by methodological problems. These include diagnostic accuracy, case ascertainment, and selection bias. In this article recent progress in this area is discussed and suggestions for future research are made. RECENT FINDINGS: It is generally accepted that in developed countries the incidence is around 50/100 000/year. In resource-poor countries, the incidence is likely to be higher. Prevalence of active epilepsy is in the range of 5-10/1000 in most locations, although it might be higher in some isolates. Age-specific incidence rates have changed, with a decrease in younger age groups and an increase in persons above 60 years. The overall prognosis for seizure control is good and over 70% will enter remission. Epilepsy carries an increased risk of premature death particularly in patients with chronic epilepsy. Sudden unexpected death has been increasingly recognized as a major culprit for this increased mortality. SUMMARY: There is geographic variation in the incidence of epileptic syndromes likely to be associated with genetic and environmental factors, although as yet causality has not been fully established. The complete range of aetiologies in the general population is not known. Few predictors of outcome are recognized and it is difficult to prognosticate in any individual case. Knowledge is patchy about the epidemiology of sudden unexpected death in epilepsy. Future epidemiological research needs to address these issues if we are to progress.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Early Identification of Refractory Epilepsy
Kwan, P., & Brodie, M. J. (2000) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm200002033420503 · Cited by 5,204
MacDonald, B. K. (2000) · Brain · doi:10.1093/brain/123.4.665 · Cited by 858
Lhatoo, S. D., Johnson, A. L., Goodridge, D. M., MacDonald, B. K., Sander, J. W. A. S., & Shorvon, S. D. (2001) · Annals of Neurology · doi:10.1002/ana.70 · Cited by 342
Self-citationChildren versus adults: pharmacokinetic and adverse-effect differences
Anderson, G. D. (2002) · Epilepsia · doi:10.1046/j.1528-1157.43.s.3.5.x · Cited by 187
Cited by
GANZEBOOM, K. S., MAIRUHU, G., REITSMA, J. B., LINZER, M., WIELING, W., & VAN DIJK, N. (2006) · Journal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology · doi:10.1111/j.1540-8167.2006.00595.x · Cited by 375
The natural history and prognosis of epilepsy
Beghi, E., Giussani, G., & Sander, J. W. (2015) · Epileptic Disorders · doi:10.1684/epd.2015.0751 · Cited by 268
Self-citationAutomated seizure detection systems and their effectiveness for each type of seizure
Ulate-Campos, A., Coughlin, F., Gaínza-Lein, M., Fernández, I. S., Pearl, P. L., & Loddenkemper, T. (2016) · Seizure · doi:10.1016/j.seizure.2016.06.008 · Cited by 233
Ramasubbu, R., Taylor, V. H., Samaan, Z., Sockalingham, S., Li, M., Patten, S., Rodin, G., Schaffer, A., Beaulieu, S., & McIntyre, R. S. (2012) · Annals of Clinical Psychiatry · doi:10.1177/104012371202400110 · Cited by 206
The sodium leak channel, NALCN, in health and disease
Cochet-Bissuel, M., Lory, P., & Monteil, A. (2014) · Frontiers in Cellular Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fncel.2014.00132 · Cited by 172
Metadata
- Authors
- Sander, J. W.
- Venue
- Current Opinion in Neurology
- Published
- 2003-04
- Volume
- 16
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 165-170
- ISSN
- 1350-7540 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1979315780
- Cited by
- 867
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 9.93
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.