Cited by 59Trauma, Hemostasis, Coagulopathy, ResuscitationSepsis Diagnosis and TreatmentInflammation biomarkers and pathways

Distinct effects of systemic infusion of G-CSF vs. IL-6 on lung and liver inflammation and injury in hemorrhagic shock

Meng, Zhi Hong, Dyer, Kevin, Billiar, Timothy R., Tweardy, David J.·2000·Shock

Abstract

Production of pro-inflammatory cytokines, such as granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) and interleukin-6 (IL-6) occurs at multiple tissue sites in hemorrhagic shock (HS), resulting in elevated circulating plasma levels. The current study was designed to test the hypothesis that circulating G-CSF and IL-6 contribute to polymorphonuclear neutrophilic granulocyte (PMN)-mediated inflammation and organ injury in HS. Sprague-Dawley rats were subjected to decompensated HS (mean arterial blood pressure = 40 mm Hg for 2.5 h), followed by resuscitation with lactated Ringer's solution with or without G-CSF (3 microg/kg) or IL-6 (3 microg/kg). Animals were killed 4 h after resuscitation, and their lungs and livers were assessed quantitatively for PMN infiltration, organ injury, and activation of NF-kappaB and signal transducer and activator or transcription (STAT) 3. Infusion of G-CSF during resuscitation increased PMN infiltration into the lungs by 2.4-fold (P < 0.01) compared with animals resuscitated with lactated Ringer's solution alone. Increased PMN infiltration was accompanied by interstitial edema and pneumocyte swelling, resulting in a 42% increase in lung alveolar wall cross-sectional surface area (P < 0.01) and a 3.7-fold increase in Stat3 activity (P < 0.01). G-CSF infusion did not affect PMN infiltration into the liver and was accompanied by a 68% decrease in focal hepatocellular necrosis (P < 0.01). Infusion of IL-6, in contrast, dramatically decreased inflammation…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/00024382-200014010-00008

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Meng, Z. H., Dyer, K., Billiar, T. R., & Tweardy, D. J.
Affiliations
  • Baylor College of Medicine (US)
  • University of Pittsburgh (US)
Corresponding author
Tweardy, David J.
Venue
Shock
Published
2000-07
Volume
14
Issue
1
Pages
41-48
ISSN
1073-2322 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2003462212
Cited by
59
References
0
Citations by year
2020: 4 · 2018: 2 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 3
FWCI
3.74
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Shock (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Cancer Institute (CA72261, R01CA072261)
  • National Institute of General Medical Sciences (GM-53789, P50GM053789)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine › Trauma, Hemostasis, Coagulopathy, Resuscitation
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Sepsis Diagnosis and Treatment
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Immunology › Inflammation biomarkers and pathways
Keywords
hemorrhagic shock, granulocyte colony-stimulating factor, interleukin-6, lung injury, liver injury, liver necrosis, NF-κB, STAT3, inflammatory cytokines, fluid resuscitation, interstitial edema
MeSH terms
Animals, DNA-Binding Proteins, Hepatitis, Animal, Ischemia, Liver, Lung, Male, Necrosis, Nitric Oxide, Pneumonia, Recombinant Proteins, Resuscitation, Shock, Hemorrhagic, Reperfusion Injury, Trans-Activators, Interleukin-6, Granulocyte Colony-Stimulating Factor, Cytokines, NF-kappa B, Rats, Sprague-Dawley, Neutrophil Infiltration, STAT3 Transcription Factor, Rats

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review