Cited by 314Cytokine Signaling Pathways and InteractionsNF-κB Signaling PathwaysProtein Tyrosine Phosphatases

Targeting Janus Kinases and Signal Transducer and Activator of Transcription 3 To Treat Inflammation, Fibrosis, and Cancer: Rationale, Progress, and Caution

Open access
Bharadwaj, Uddalak, Kasembeli, Moses M., Robinson, Prema, Tweardy, David J.·2020·Pharmacological Reviews

Abstract

Before it was molecularly cloned in 1994, acute-phase response factor or signal transducer and activator of transcription (STAT)3 was the focus of intense research into understanding the mammalian response to injury, particularly the acute-phase response. Although known to be essential for liver production of acute-phase reactant proteins, many of which augment innate immune responses, molecular cloning of acute-phase response factor or STAT3 and the research this enabled helped establish the central function of Janus kinase (JAK) family members in cytokine signaling and identified a multitude of cytokines and peptide hormones, beyond interleukin-6 and its family members, that activate JAKs and STAT3, as well as numerous new programs that their activation drives. Many, like the acute-phase response, are adaptive, whereas several are maladaptive and lead to chronic inflammation and adverse consequences, such as cachexia, fibrosis, organ dysfunction, and cancer. Molecular cloning of STAT3 also enabled the identification of other noncanonical roles for STAT3 in normal physiology, including its contribution to the function of the electron transport chain and oxidative phosphorylation, its basal and stress-related adaptive functions in mitochondria, its function as a scaffold in inflammation-enhanced platelet activation, and its contributions to endothelial permeability and calcium efflux from endoplasmic reticulum. In this review, we will summarize the molecular and cellular biology of JAK/STAT3 signaling and its functions under basal and stress conditions, which are adaptive, and then review maladaptive JAK/STAT3 signaling in animals and humans that lead to disease, as well as recent attempts to modulate them to treat these diseases. In addition, we will discuss how consideration of the noncanonical and stress-related functions of STAT3 cannot be ignored in efforts to target the canonical functions of STAT3, if the goal is to develop drugs that are not only effective but safe. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT: Key biological functions of Janus kinase (JAK)/signal transducer and activator of transcription (STAT)3 signaling can be delineated into two broad categories: those essential for normal cell and organ development and those activated in response to stress that are adaptive. Persistent or dysregulated JAK/STAT3 signaling, however, is maladaptive and contributes to many diseases, including diseases characterized by chronic inflammation and fibrosis, and cancer. A comprehensive understanding of JAK/STAT3 signaling in normal development, and in adaptive and maladaptive responses to stress, is essential for the continued development of safe and effective therapies that target this signaling pathway.

AI snapshot

Written from the paper’s full text.

TL;DR

This review summarizes canonical and noncanonical JAK/STAT3 biology and argues that persistent or dysregulated JAK/STAT3 signaling drives inflammation, fibrosis, metabolic disease, cachexia, and cancer. It also cautions that STAT3-targeting therapies must avoid noncanonical/mitochondrial STAT3 functions to reduce toxicity.

Key findings

  • JAK/STAT3 signaling is essential in development and stress responses: global STAT3 deletion is embryonic lethal at day 6.5, and JAK1/JAK2 deficiency is embryonically lethal due to neurologic defects and deficient erythropoiesis, respectively.
  • Persistent JAK/STAT3 activation is maladaptive in many diseases; JAK2 V617F is present in ∼95% of polycythemia vera, 50%–60% of essential thrombocythemia, and ∼50% of primary myelofibrosis patients.
  • STAT3 inhibitors in clinical testing show mixed results: in a Phase IB danvatirsen trial, 30 patients were enrolled, with 2 of 27 diffuse large B cell lymphoma patients achieving complete responses and 2 partial responses; in a Phase I OPB-111077 trial of 145 patients, objective responses occurred in only two patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma.
  • TTI-101 (C188-9) inhibited STAT3 with Ki = 12.4 nM; in a Phase I study, 5 of 10 patients had clinical benefit, with one partial response (40% tumor reduction) lasting 12 months, and TTI-101 did not affect mitochondrial ATP generation or oxygen consumption in tested cells.

Methods

  • Design: narrative review of molecular, cellular, preclinical, and clinical literature on JAK/STAT3 signaling and its therapeutic targeting.
  • Data/sample: published studies, animal models, patient syndromes such as autosomal-dominant hyper-IgE syndrome (AD-HIES/Job’s syndrome), and clinical trials of Jakinibs and STAT3 inhibitors.
  • Main analysis: synthesis of canonical and noncanonical STAT3 functions, disease associations, and drug-development progress, with a cautionary framework for targeting STAT3 safely.

Limitations

  • The paper states that STAT3 inhibitors must achieve sufficient target engagement, especially in cancer, while avoiding toxicity in noncancer indications; it specifically warns that targeting mitochondrial STAT3 caused toxicities in OPB-31121/OPB-51602 trials.
  • The paper advises monitoring patients for AD-HIES-like symptoms (e.g., eczema, bacterial pneumonia, skin abscesses, mucocutaneous candidiasis) and avoiding STAT3 inhibitors around surgery or traumatic injury until wound healing is complete.
  • Evident from the text: this is a narrative review without a described systematic search or meta-analysis, and many cited therapeutic findings are preclinical or from early-phase, small, and sometimes unselected clinical trials.

Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1124/pr.119.018440

Cites

609 of 609 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Nothing to recompute.

Claims the paper makes

200 of 405 cited sources checked · 72 supported · 3 flagged · accuracy not yet measured

  • Premisecitation

    Ghrelin acts in opposition to leptin to downregulate feeding behavior via vagal afferent pathways by inducing cAMP-mediated increase in SOCS3 expression, which negatively affects leptin-induced pY-STAT3 and blocks neuronal firing in nodose ganglia neurons.

    “The orexigenic hormone ghrelin acts in opposition to leptin to downregulate feeding behavior via the vagal afferent pathways by inducing exchange protein activated by cAMP–mediated increase in SOCS3 expression, which negatively affects leptin-induced pY-STAT3 and blocks neuronal firing in nodose ganglia neurons”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Heldsinger et al., 2014 source

      Split into 2 atoms — 1 confirmed, 0 partially supported, 1 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.

      Checked by a reasoning model — may be wrong.

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Premisecitation

    STAT3 inhibitors-SF-1-066, BP-1-102, and MM206-may, in addition to binding to the SH2 domain, affect the function of the SH2 domain by binding to and perturbing the structure of domains of STAT3 at a distance from the SH2 domain, suggesting an allosteric destabilizing effect on the SH2 domain.

    “For example, hydrogen–deuterium exchange experiments and other studies show that STAT3 inhibitors—SF-1-066, BP-1-102, and MM206—may, in addition to binding to the SH2 domain, affect the function of the SH2 domain by binding to and perturbing the structure of domains of STAT3 at a distance from the SH2 domain, suggesting an allosteric destabilizing effect on the SH2 domain (Resetca et al., 2014;”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim2 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Resetca et al., 2014 source

      Split into 2 atoms — 0 confirmed, 1 partially supported, 1 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.

      Checked by a reasoning model — may be wrong.

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites Minus et al., 2015 source

      Split into 2 atoms — 0 confirmed, 2 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Premisecitation

    The human genome encodes four JAKs: JAK1, JAK2, JAK3, and TYK2.

    “The human genome encodes four JAKs—JAK1, JAK2, JAK3, and tyrosine kinase 2 (TYK2)—that associate selectively (Fig. 1) with different receptors (Wilks, 1989; Firmbach-Kraft et al., 1990; Wilks et al., 1991; Harpur et al., 1992).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Wilks, 1989 source
    • cites Firmbach-Kraft et al., 1990
    • cites Wilks et al., 1991 source

      The abstract (p. 2057) identifies JAK1 and says JAK2 is a second member of the family. The indexed passages do not identify JAK3 or TYK2 or state that the human genome encodes exactly four JAKs, so this paper supports only part of the attributed list. (LLM, conf=0.87)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Premisecitation

    Respiratory epithelium-specific STAT3 knockout impairs injury tolerance.

    “Impaired injury tolerance”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Hokuto et al., 2004 source
  • Premisecitation

    Intestinal epithelium-specific STAT3 knockout impairs epithelial wound healing.

    “Impaired epithelial wound healing”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Pickert et al., 2009 source
  • May combine two claims. 106
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 19
  • The quote only partly states this claim. 2
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Studies in mut-Stat3 mice bearing two copies of the V463del STAT3 mutation demonstrated defective mast cell degranulation and reduced endothelial cell permeability.

    “Studies in the mut-Stat3 bearing two copies of the V463del STAT3 mutation frequently found in Job’s syndrome patients demonstrated both defective mast cell degranulation and reduced endothelial cell permeability”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim2 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Siegel et al., 2013 source

      The Methods (mut-Stat3 mice; page unavailable) describe mice carrying two copies of a transgene encoding the V463 deletion. The Results (page unavailable) report a reduced anaphylactic response and infer impaired in vivo mast cell degranulation. The paper does not report reduced endothelial cell permeability; its mouse anaphylaxis assay measured body temperature, not permeability. (LLM, conf=0.88)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites Hox et al., 2016 source

      The Results section reports reduced anaphylaxis in Stat3-mutant mice, and the Conclusions attribute reduced vascular permeability to impaired STAT3 signaling. But the Results explicitly say the mutant mice showed no significant difference in histamine release after challenge, contrary to the claim that their mast cell degranulation was defective. The cited passages do not specify the V463del genotype (page numbers unavailable). (LLM, conf=0.90)

      Checked by a reasoning model — may be wrong.

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    The JAK/STAT pathway is activated by many protein ligands, including cytokines, growth factors, interferons, and peptide hormones, and regulates cell growth, proliferation, differentiation, and apoptosis.

    “This pathway is activated in response to many protein ligands, including cytokines, growth factors, interferons (IFNs), and peptide hormones, where it regulates a wide range of cellular processes, including cell growth, proliferation, differentiation, and apoptosis (Rawlings et al., 2004; O’Shea et al., 2013).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Rawlings et al., 2004 source
    • cites O’Shea et al., 2013 source

      The CYTOKINES AND JAK–STAT SIGNALING section identifies interferons, colony-stimulating factors, growth hormone, and other peptide hormones as ligands whose receptors use JAK–STAT signaling, and links these signals to growth and differentiation. The CANCER section links STAT activation to proliferation and cell survival. The source does not support the implication that growth factors generally activate this pathway, and it does not explicitly describe apoptosis as a process the pathway regulates. (LLM, conf=0.86)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    JAK1 and JAK2 deficiency is embryonically lethal due to neurologic defects and deficiencies in erythropoiesis, respectively; JAK3 and TYK2 deficiencies are associated with severe immunodeficiency syndromes in animal models and humans.

    “Their essential role in developmental biology is underscored by the fact that deficiency in JAK1 and JAK2 is embryonically lethal due to neurologic defects and deficiencies in erythropoiesis, respectively, whereas deficiencies in JAK3 and TYK2 are associated with a variety of severe immunodeficiency syndromes in animal models and humans (Ghoreschi et al., 2009).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Ghoreschi et al., 2009 source

      The Jak1 deficiency section describes Jak1-knockout mice as perinatally lethal, probably due to neurological deficits—not embryonically lethal. The Jak2 deficiency section reports embryonic lethality from defective erythropoiesis, while the sections on Jak3 and Tyk2 describe immunodeficiency in humans and mouse models. (LLM, conf=0.90)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    JAKs have four structural domains: N-terminal FERM, SH2, catalytically active JH1 kinase, and pseudo-kinase JH2; JH2 is enzymatically inactive but represses kinase activity.

    “Recent X-ray crystal structural studies have provided a clearer delineation of JAK structural architecture, with four distinct domains: 1) N-terminal band 4.1, ezrin, radixin, moesin (FERM) domain; 2) SH2 domain; 3) the catalytically active JH1 kinase domain located at the C-terminal end; and 4) the pseudo-kinase domain (JH2), located adjacent to it, which is enzymatically inactive but has a cruc”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Lupardus et al., 2014 source

      The introductory passage describes four JAK domains in the stated order, and the Results show that the TYK2 pseudokinase inhibits kinase activity. But the introduction also reports weak catalytic activity in the JAK2 pseudokinase, so the categorical claim that JH2 is enzymatically inactive is not supported. Our copy provides no page number for these passages. (LLM, conf=0.90)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Many cytokines bind receptors composed of heterologous polypeptide chains, several of which are shared; a single or combination of two to three JAKs selectively associates with each receptor, and a combination of different STATs can be activated by a single cytokine.

    “Many cytokines bind to receptors composed of heterologous polypeptide chains, and several of the polypeptide chains are common or shared. In addition, a single or combination of two to three JAKs selectively associates with each receptor (Lin et al., 1995; Baker et al., 2007; Kiu and Nicholson, 2012) (Fig. 2). The consequence is that a combination of different STATs can be activated by a single cy”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Lin et al., 1995 source
    • cites Baker et al., 2007 source
    • cites Kiu and Nicholson, 2012 source

      Split into 2 atoms — 1 confirmed, 1 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    SHP-2 is recruited to the pYSTV motif of gp130 and phosphorylated on tyrosine residues by JAKs, which increases its tyrosine phosphatase activity for STAT3 and reduces pY-STAT3 levels.

    “The phosphatase tyrosine–protein phosphatase nonreceptor type 11, also known as protein–tyrosine phosphatase 1D or Src homology protein tyrosine phosphatase (SHP)-2, is recruited to the pYSTV motif of gp130 and phosphorylated on tyrosine residues by JAKs, which increases its tyrosine phosphatase activity for STAT3, which reduces pY-STAT3 levels (Schmitz et al., 2000).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Schmitz et al., 2000 source

      The Discussion (page unavailable) says SHP2 binds gp130 Tyr759, is phosphorylated after IL-6 stimulation, and negatively regulates STAT activation. It does not establish that JAKs directly phosphorylate SHP2 or that phosphorylation increases SHP2’s phosphatase activity toward STAT3. Instead, it discusses MAPK pathway activation as a possible route to reduced STAT phosphorylation. (LLM, conf=0.87)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    SOCS3 mRNA is rapidly induced by activated STAT3 and STAT1; SOCS3 protein interacts with the pYSTV motif of gp130 through its SH2 domain and inhibits JAK activity through its kinase-inhibitory region, restricting further STAT3 activation.

    “Another inhibitory loop is mediated by suppressor of cytokine signaling (SOCS)3 (Yoshimura et al., 2007). SOCS3 mRNA is rapidly induced by activated STAT3 and STAT1, and SOCS3 protein interacts with pYSTV motif of gp130 through its SH2 domain and inhibits JAK activity through its kinase-inhibitory region, thereby restricting further STAT3 activation (Babon et al., 2012; Kershaw et al., 2013).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim2 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Yoshimura et al., 2007 source
    • cites Babon et al., 2012 source

      The Results describe an SH2-domain ligand containing the gp130 pYSTV sequence, show that the kinase-inhibitory region is required for JAK inhibition, and demonstrate that SOCS3 inhibits JAK2 substrate phosphorylation (page not available in our copy). The Introduction describes SOCS expression as induced by JAK–STAT activation, but does not establish rapid SOCS3 mRNA induction specifically by activated STAT3 and STAT1. (LLM, conf=0.87)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites Kershaw et al., 2013 source

      The Results section identifies the gp130 pYSTV-containing binding site and shows the gp130 fragment in SOCS3’s SH2-domain binding groove. The Introduction describes direct JAK inhibition by SOCS3’s kinase-inhibitory region, supporting the proposed restraint on JAK/STAT signaling. Our copy does not establish that activated STAT3 and STAT1 rapidly induce SOCS3 mRNA, or specifically demonstrate reduced further STAT3 activation. (LLM, conf=0.88)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    PTEN acts as a negative regulator of STAT3 through its protein phosphatase activity, but this modulation is context dependent and PTEN can also positively regulate STAT3 in certain tumors such as gliomas.

    “Other phosphatases have been implicated in the modulation of STAT3 signaling, for example, phosphatase and tensin homologue deleted on chromosome 10 (PTEN), which has both lipid and protein phosphatase activity, has been shown to act as a negative regulator of STAT3 (Sun and Steinberg, 2002; Mukhopadhyay et al., 2010), where its protein phosphatase activity negatively affects phosphorylation of”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Sun and Steinberg, 2002 source
    • cites Mukhopadhyay et al., 2010 source
    • cites de la Iglesia et al., 2008 source

      The Discussion (page unavailable) supports positive regulation in this context: PTEN loss reduces LIFRβ expression and STAT3 Tyr705 phosphorylation in astrocytes, and correlates with STAT3 inactivation in human glioblastomas. It does not support the attributed negative regulation through PTEN’s protein phosphatase activity; the mechanism it describes runs through Akt–FOXO and LIFRβ. (LLM, conf=0.88)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    pS727 in the nucleus is required for recruitment of histone lysine methyltransferase SET9, which dimethylates STAT3 at Lys140, leading to pY705 inhibition.

    “Mechanistically, pS727 in the nucleus is required for the recruitment of histone lysine methyltransferase SET9, which dimethylates STAT3 at Lys140, leading to pY705 inhibition (Yang et al., 2010).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Yang et al., 2010 source

      The Results show that nuclear, DNA-bound STAT3 requires S727 phosphorylation for K140 dimethylation, and that SET9 is required for that modification. They also report greater and more sustained Y705 phosphorylation when K140 cannot be methylated. But the Discussion presents recruitment of SET9 by phosphorylated S727 only as a possibility, and the Results say the mechanistic link between K140 methylation and Y705 phosphorylation is unclear. (LLM, conf=0.90)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    In some instances, S727 phosphorylation counteracts Y705 function; for example, cdk5-mediated pS727 represses FoxP3 upregulation and limits T regulatory cell development, and reduction in pS727 by CK2-protein phosphatase 2A enhances pY-STAT3-induced tumorigenic potential of glioma cells.

    “However, there are instances when pS727 appears to counteract pY705 function. e.g., cdk5-mediated pS727 repressed FoxP3 upregulation, thereby limiting T regulatory cell (Treg) development (Lam et al., 2015), and reduction in pS727 by CK2–protein phosphatase 2A enhanced pY-STAT3–induced tumorigenic potential of glioma cells (Mandal et al., 2014).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Lam et al., 2015 source

      Split into 2 atoms — 1 confirmed, 1 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites Mandal et al., 2014 source
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    STAT3 can be activated independent of pY705 phosphorylation by simultaneous phosphorylation of Thr-714 and Ser727 and upon engagement of CD44 through Lys-685 acetylation.

    “STAT3 can also be activated independent of pY705 phosphorylation by simultaneous phosphorylation of Thr-714 and Ser727 (Waitkus et al., 2014) and upon engagement of CD44 through Lys-685 acetylation (Lee et al., 2009b).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Waitkus et al., 2014 source
    • cites Lee et al., 2009b

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    STAT3 activation mediates neutrophil mobilization in the bone marrow, neutrophil release into the circulation, and neutrophil chemotaxis by upregulating CXCR2/Il8rb and MIP-2/Cxcl2.

    “STAT3 activation mediates neutrophil mobilization in the bone marrow”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Panopoulos et al., 2006 source

      The Results and Discussion support a role for STAT3 in acute G-CSF–induced neutrophil mobilization from bone marrow into circulation and in chemotaxis toward MIP-2. They do not support the quoted mechanism of upregulating CXCR2/Il8rb and MIP-2/Cxcl2: the Results explicitly state that CXCR2 expression is independent of STAT3 and describe MIP-2 as a chemoattractant used to test the response. The Discussion also cautions that STAT3 is not necessary for all neutrophil mobilization. (LLM, conf=0.88)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites Nguyen-Jackson et al., 2010 source
    • cites Nguyen-Jackson et al., 2010, 2012

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Hepatocyte-specific STAT3 knockout causes insulin resistance and impaired liver regeneration.

    “Insulin resistance; impaired liver regeneration”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Inoue et al., 2004 source
    • cites Moh et al., 2007 source

      The Abstract and the section on liver-mass restoration report higher early mortality and a slight, temporary decrease in hepatocyte DNA synthesis after liver-specific STAT3 deletion. They also report complete liver-mass recovery, so they do not support a general claim of impaired regeneration. Our copy does not report insulin resistance (searched: “insulin resistance”). Page numbers were unavailable. (LLM, conf=0.87)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Hematopoietic progenitor-specific STAT3 knockout leaves basal hematopoiesis unaltered but impairs stem cell regeneration after 5-FU.

    “Unaltered basal hematopoiesis; impaired stem cell regeneration after 5-FU”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Lee et al., 2002 source

      The Introduction describes STAT3 deletion in hematopoietic progenitors, and the granulopoiesis results report similar total white-cell counts and numbers of general precursors in controls and knockout mice. But basal hematopoiesis was not wholly unaltered: the mutants had increased neutrophils. The paper describes treating mice with 5-fluorouracil, but the located passage does not report impaired stem-cell regeneration afterward (page unavailable in our copy). (LLM, conf=0.85)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites Chung et al., 2006 source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    The AD-HIES STAT3 mutation leads to STAT3 protein instability and reduced half-life.

    “leads to STAT3 protein instability and reduced half-life”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Bocchini et al., 2016 source

      The Results report that most AD-HIES STAT3 mutations are predicted to destabilize the protein, and the STAT3 protein half-life section reports a 79% reduction in patient cells with structural or structural-functional mutations. The claim is unqualified: that same section reports a normal half-life for cells with the functional mutation R382W. (LLM, conf=0.87)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    T cell-specific STAT3 knockout increases apoptosis and impairs Th17 development.

    “Increased apoptosis and impaired Th17 development”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Takeda et al., 1998b source

      The section ‘IL-6 does not prevent apoptosis of Stat3-deficient T cells’ (page not specified) reports that IL-6 failed to reduce apoptosis in T cell-specific Stat3-deficient cells, supporting the apoptosis portion under that condition. Our copy does not report impaired Th17 development; the Discussion instead reports no apparent abnormality in general T cell development, which does not settle the Th17-specific claim. (LLM, conf=0.89)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites Yang et al., 2007b

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    AD-HIES primary immune defects include decreased generation of Th17 cells and production of IL-17 and IL-22, which reduces epithelial production of chemokines and defensins.

    “decreased generation of Th17 cells and production of IL-17 and IL-22, which reduces epithelial production of chemokines and defensins”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim2 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Yong et al., 2012 source
    • cites Zhang et al., 2018 source

      The Job’s syndrome section (page unavailable) reports low Th17-cell levels and defective Th17 differentiation in patients with AD STAT3 deficiency, and links IL-17 activity to neutrophil recruitment. It does not state that these patients produce less IL-22 or that reduced IL-17 and IL-22 decrease epithelial chemokine and defensin production. (LLM, conf=0.86)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    AD-HIES is a rare multisystem disorder classified as a primary immunodeficiency disease, usually of children.

    “AD-HIES is a rare multisystem disorder classified as a primary immunodeficiency disease, usually of children”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim2 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Yong et al., 2012 source

      The Introduction classifies HIES, including its autosomal dominant form, as a primary immunodeficiency and describes the condition as rare. The AD-HIES Clinical features section calls it a multisystem disease and says its rash usually appears within weeks of birth, but it does not establish that AD-HIES is usually a disease of children rather than adults. (LLM, conf=0.86)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites Zhang et al., 2018 source

      The Abstract identifies HIES as a primary immunodeficiency, and the Job’s syndrome section describes its immune, skeletal, dental, joint, and vascular manifestations and reports more than 200 patients worldwide. That section describes neonatal and other early signs, but it does not characterize AD-HIES as usually a disorder of children; it also reports that around 80% of patients live to at least age 50. (LLM, conf=0.83)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Cardiomyocyte-specific STAT3 knockout increases presbycardia and myocardial infarction susceptibility.

    “Increased presbycardia and MI susceptibility”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Jacoby et al., 2003 source

      The Results (page not provided) show greater age-related cardiac fibrosis and declining systolic function in mice with cardiomyocyte-specific STAT3 knockout, supporting the presbycardia portion. The paper reports greater susceptibility to doxorubicin-induced injury, not myocardial infarction. Its introductory mention of STAT3 activation during acute myocardial infarction does not establish increased infarction susceptibility after knockout. (LLM, conf=0.89)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites Hilfiker-Kleiner et al., 2004 source
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Thrombopoietin activates the JAK/STAT3 pathway in megakaryocytes, leading to upregulated expression of multiple genes required for platelet production.

    “Thrombopoietin activates the JAK/STAT3 pathway in megakaryocytes”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Broudy and Kaushansky, 1995 source
    • cites Kaushansky, 1995 source

      The In Vitro Activities of ML section says thrombopoietin supports megakaryocyte maturation and fragmentation into platelets, and The Successful Search Begins describes signaling through its receptor. Neither passage establishes activation of JAK/STAT3 in megakaryocytes; searches for “JAK” and “STAT3” found no such passage. The supplied claim’s additional assertion about upregulated platelet-production genes is also not established by these passages. (LLM, conf=0.82)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites Drachman and Kaushansky, 1997 source
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    IL-6- and IL-10-stimulated STAT3 suppresses dendritic cell maturation and activation and promotes immune tolerance.

    “IL-6– and IL-10–stimulated STAT3 is also known to suppress DC maturation and activation and promote immune tolerance”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Cheng et al., 2003 source
    • cites Nefedova et al., 2004 source

      The sections on STAT3 activity in DCs and decreased DC differentiation report that tumor-derived factors maintain STAT3 activity, impair DC maturation and reduce their ability to stimulate T cells. The paper identifies IL-10 as a STAT3 activator and finds that blocking it has a modest effect on tumor-conditioned STAT3 activity, but it does not establish the claimed IL-6– and IL-10–stimulated mechanism or show that it promotes immune tolerance. Page numbers are unavailable in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.86)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites Wang et al., 2004b

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Inhibition of JAK/STAT3 signaling improves mature dendritic cell function and augments antitumor immunity.

    “inhibition of JAK/STAT3 signaling improves mature DC function and augments antitumor immunity”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Nefedova et al., 2004 source

      In “Increased STAT3 activity is directly involved in accumulation of ImCs and decreased DC differentiation,” blocking STAT3 in progenitor cells restored their differentiation into mature DCs. The “Discussion” proposes that STAT3 inhibition may improve immune responses in cancer, but does not demonstrate augmented antitumor immunity. It also reports that reducing STAT3 activity in activated DCs did not improve their function, so the claim about improved mature DC function is not supported. (LLM, conf=0.90)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites Nefedova et al., 2005a

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

    • cites Nefedova et al., 2005b

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Thrombopoietin synthesis in the liver is regulated by Jak2/STAT3.

    “Thrombopoietin synthesis in the liver is regulated by Jak2/STAT3”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim2 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Grozovsky et al., 2015 source
    • cites Hoffmeister and Falet, 2016 source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Tcf4/E2-2 is transcriptionally upregulated by STAT3.

    “Tcf4/E2-2, another transcriptional regulator of plasmacytoid DC development, is also transcriptionally upregulated by STAT3”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim3 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Panopoulos et al., 2002 source

      The Discussion describes STAT3-dependent induction of PU.1 and the myeloid integrin αMβ2, not Tcf4/E2-2. Searches for Tcf4/E2-2 and plasmacytoid dendritic cells found no passage addressing whether STAT3 transcriptionally upregulates Tcf4/E2-2. Page numbers were unavailable in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.76)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites D’Amico and Wu, 2003 source

      The Results and Discussion passages (page unavailable) examine Flt3 expression in bone-marrow progenitors and their capacity to produce dendritic cells. A search for Tcf4/E2-2 and STAT3 found no passage addressing whether STAT3 transcriptionally upregulates Tcf4/E2-2. (LLM, conf=0.76)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites Onai et al., 2006 source

      The Results section reports that enforced STAT3 expression increased Flt3 mRNA in MEPs, not Tcf4/E2-2. Searches for Tcf4 and E2-2 found no passage in our copy addressing whether STAT3 upregulates that gene. Page numbers were not available in the indexed passages. (LLM, conf=0.78)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    IL-9 through a JAK2/STAT3 signaling pathway facilitates platelet function and promotes development of deep venous thrombosis.

    “IL-9 through a JAK2/STAT3 signaling pathway facilitated platelet function and promoted development of deep venous thrombosis”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Feng et al., 2018 source
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    STAT3 controls development of CXCR5-expressing T follicular helper cells, their localization to the B cell follicle within germinal centers, and their IL-21 secretion, which mediates B cell help by stimulating proliferation and antibody affinity maturation.

    “STAT3 also controls development of CXC chemokine receptor 5–expressing T follicular helper cells, their localization to the B cell follicle within germinal centers of secondary lymphoid organs, and their IL-21 secretion, which mediates B cell help in germinal centers by stimulating proliferation and antibody affinity maturation”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Leonard et al., 2008 source
    • cites Ding et al., 2013 source

      Split into 2 atoms — 0 confirmed, 2 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationcitation

    STAT3 is indispensable for physiologic leptin actions, and STAT3 dysfunction in any direction could cause pathophysiological alterations in mice and humans.

    “Overall, STAT3 is indispensable for physiologic leptin actions, and STAT3 dysfunction in any direction could cause pathophysiological alterations in mice and humans”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Akira et al., 1994 source
    • cites Wang et al., 2012 source
    • cites You et al., 2015 source

      The Introduction reports that constitutive STAT3 activation is associated with malignant tumors and that disruption of the mouse Stat3 gene causes embryonic lethality. These examples support a narrower claim that altered STAT3 function can have pathological consequences, but the paper does not address whether STAT3 is indispensable for physiological leptin actions or establish the claimed effects of dysfunction in any direction across mice and humans (searched: leptin actions, leptin receptor, pathophysiological alterations). (LLM, conf=0.78)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • Rests on an assumption: Findings from mouse models of STAT3 deletion or mutation can be extrapolated to human STAT3 biology and disease.
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    In graft-versus-host disease, STAT3 deficiency promotes inducible Treg generation, restrains GVHD, and improves mouse survival.

    “In the setting of graft-versus-host disease (GVHD), STAT3 deficiency promotes inducible Treg generation, restrains GVHD, and improves mouse survival”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Laurence et al., 2012 source
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    STAT3 deletion in neurons decreases POMC and increases AgRP and neuropeptide Y levels, leading to hyperphagia, obesity, infertility, and thermal dysregulation.

    “STAT3 deletion in neurons decreases POMC and increases AgRP and neuropeptide Y levels, leading to hyperphagia, obesity, infertility, and thermal dysregulation”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Gao et al., 2004 source
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    STAT3 and Foxp3 coregulate IL-10 in Tregs through histone acetyl transferase-1/FoxP3-mediated epigenetic modification of the IL-10 promoter, maintaining the ability of Foxp3+ Tregs to inhibit inflammatory Th17 cells.

    “STAT3 and Foxp3 appear to coregulate IL10 in T-regs”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim3 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Chaudhry et al., 2009 source

      The supplied passage labeled Abstract reports that Foxp3 associates with active Stat3 in Tregs and that Il10 is among the genes dependent on both, supporting the hedged coregulation statement in the verbatim citing sentence. The copy does not establish histone acetyltransferase-1–mediated modification of the Il10 promoter or show that this particular mechanism maintains Th17 suppression; its promoter-binding experiments concern Il6 and Tgfb1 instead. (LLM, conf=0.88)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites Chaudhry et al., 2011 source

      The Results section (“IL-10R signaling facilitates IL-10 production by Treg cells”; page unavailable) shows that STAT3 binds the Il10 locus and links IL-10R signaling to IL-10 expression in Tregs. The Introduction says STAT3 and Foxp3 cooperatively regulate a subset of genes, but our copy does not establish that IL10 is one of those jointly regulated genes. (LLM, conf=0.84)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites Chaudhry and Rudensky, 2013 source

      In “Treg-mediated control of inflammatory responses” (page unavailable), the paper says STAT3 binds Foxp3 and modulates gene expression, and that STAT3 is needed to control Th17 responses. It does not identify IL-10 as a gene they coregulate. The “Overriding inhibitions” section instead describes IL-10-mediated STAT3 activation in Tregs; neither passage supports the claimed acetyltransferase-mediated modification of the IL-10 promoter. (LLM, conf=0.87)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    AD-HIES patients demonstrate reduced numbers of memory CD8+ T cells and fewer memory CD4+ T cells relative to healthy controls.

    “AD-HIES patients demonstrate reduced numbers of memory CD8+ T cells, as well as fewer memory CD4+ T cells, relative to healthy controls”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Siegel et al., 2013 source

      The Results discuss reduced memory B-cell frequency and impaired T follicular helper-cell generation in AD-HIES, but do not report numbers of memory CD8+ or memory CD4+ T cells. Searches for those subsets and for reduced T-cell memory populations yielded no supporting passage in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.75)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    STAT3 transcriptionally upregulates anti-inflammatory TGF-β1 and IL-10 in CD4+ T cells and helps IL-10-dependent induction of Th3 cells.

    “STAT3 also transcriptionally upregulates anti-inflammatory transforming growth factor (TGF)-β1 and IL-10 in CD4+ T cells”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Kinjyo et al., 2006 source

      The Results section reports that active STAT3 increased both TGF-β1 and IL-10 production in CD4+ T cells, and shows STAT3 binding to the TGF-β1 promoter. The Discussion says STAT3 may promote Th3 induction and that IL-10 is usually necessary for Th3 induction in vitro. The copy does not establish direct transcriptional upregulation of IL-10 by STAT3 in these cells or demonstrate that STAT3's effect on Th3 induction depends on IL-10. Page numbers were not available in the supplied copy. (LLM, conf=0.83)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Leptin binds to its specific receptor LepRb on cells in the central nervous system and peripheral tissues, including skeletal muscle, placenta, ovary, pituitary gland, and lymphoid tissue.

    “Leptin binds to its specific receptor, LepRb, on cells in the central nervous system (CNS) and peripheral tissues, including skeletal muscle, placenta, ovary, pituitary gland, and lymphoid tissue”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Park and Ahima, 2014 source

      The Physiology of leptin section says leptin binds to LepRs in the brain and peripheral tissues, and that LepRb is the isoform primarily responsible for signaling. It lists skeletal muscle, placenta, ovary, pituitary gland, and lymphoid tissue as sites of leptin expression—not specifically as sites of LepRb expression. No page number is provided in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.90)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    STAT3 facilitates adipogenesis from preadipocytes through epigenetic activation of PPARγ and transcriptional upregulation of C/EBPβ.

    “STAT3 facilitates adipogenesis from preadipocytes”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim2 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Wang et al., 2009 source
    • cites Kang et al., 2013 source

      The Introduction (page not available) says that STAT3 regulates adipogenesis in 3T3-L1 preadipocytes through PPARγ and C/EBPβ, and reports regulation of C/EBPβ transcription. It does not describe epigenetic activation of PPARγ, so that mechanism in the quoted claim is unsupported; the shorter citing sentence is supported. (LLM, conf=0.86)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites Cristancho and Lazar, 2011 source

      The ‘C/EBP activation by adipogenic stimuli’ section says that a JAK2–STAT3 cascade directly promotes C/EBPβ expression in committed preadipocytes, supporting the printed sentence. The ‘Epigenomics provides insights into early PPARγ activation’ section discusses epigenetic regulation of PPARγ but does not attribute that regulation to STAT3, so the fuller quoted mechanism is not fully supported. No page numbers are available in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.86)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    IL-10 protects against high-fat diet-induced inflammation and improves glucose tolerance through activation of STAT3.

    “IL-10 protects against high-fat diet–induced inflammation and improves glucose tolerance through the activation of STAT3 (Grant et al., 2014).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Grant et al., 2014 source

      The glucose-homeostasis Results report improved glucose tolerance and reduced adipose inflammation in high-fat-fed mice lacking myeloid PTP1B. The Discussion proposes a STAT3-dependent expansion of IL-10-secreting cells as the mechanism, but presents that mechanism as postulated; it does not establish that IL-10 itself caused the improved glucose tolerance through STAT3 activation. Page numbers are unavailable in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.86)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationcitation

    The importance of the leptin/STAT3 pathway in immune aging, tumor progression, and T cell dysfunction in cancer is suggested by findings that obese cancer patients respond better than nonobese patients to checkpoint therapy, especially PD1/PD-L1 therapy, perhaps due to increased leptin signaling.

    “The importance of the leptin/STAT3 pathway in immune aging, tumor progression, and T cell dysfunction in cancer is suggested by recent findings that obese cancer patients respond better than nonobese patients to checkpoint therapy, especially therapy directed against the programmed cell death protein 1 (PD1)/programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) axis perhaps due to increased leptin signaling”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Wang et al., 2019 source
    • Rests on an assumption: Findings from mouse models of STAT3 deletion or mutation can be extrapolated to human STAT3 biology and disease.
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Insulin increases IL-6 expression in Kupffer cells and activates STAT3 in hepatocytes.

    “Insulin increases IL-6 expression in Kupffer cells and activates STAT3 in hepatocytes (Inoue, 2016)”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Inoue, 2016 source

      The section “Central insulin action regulates HGP” (page not provided) says central insulin action increases IL-6 secretion by Kupffer cells, which activates STAT3 in hepatocytes. It supports the pathway, but the body passage does not establish the claim’s more specific point that IL-6 expression increases. (LLM, conf=0.82)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Adipocyte-specific Stat3-KO mice have increased body weight and more adipose tissue mass due to adipocyte hypertrophy, without evidence of adipocyte hyperplasia, hyperphagia, or reduced energy expenditure.

    “Adipocyte-specific Stat3-KO mice have increased body weight and more adipose tissue mass due to adipocyte hypertrophy, but do not show evidence of adipocyte hyperplasia, hyperphagia, or reduced energy expenditure (Cernkovich et al., 2008), suggesting a role of STAT3 in lipolysis.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Cernkovich et al., 2008 source

      The Discussion reports increased body weight and adiposity associated with adipocyte hypertrophy, not hyperplasia, hyperphagia, or reduced energy expenditure, in male ASKO mice fed standard chow. The claim omits that restriction: the Results report normal growth curves in female ASKO mice. (LLM, conf=0.88)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Oxidative modifications affect the transcriptional activity of STAT3 through inhibiting Y705 phosphorylation and/or DNA binding, inducing formation of higher order complexes, and interfering with the function of the TAD.

    “These modifications affect the transcriptional activity of STAT3 through inhibiting Y705 phosphorylation and/or DNA binding, as well as inducing formation of higher order complexes and interfering with the function of the TAD (Li and Shaw, 2004; Xie et al., 2009; Li et al., 2010a; Kurdi et al., 2012; Butturini et al., 2014; Sobotta et al., 2015).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Li and Shaw, 2004 source
    • cites Xie et al., 2009 source

      The Discussion reports that STAT3 S-glutathionylation reduces IL-6-induced tyrosine phosphorylation and transcriptional activation, and that S-thiolation reduces DNA binding. Our copy does not support attributing higher-order complex formation or interference with the transactivation domain (TAD) to this paper. (LLM, conf=0.87)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites Li et al., 2010a

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Peroxide treatment leads to phosphorylation of STAT3 (pY-STAT3) and its nuclear translocation in human lymphocytes.

    “Peroxide treatment leads to phosphorylation of STAT3 (pY-STAT3) and its nuclear translocation in human lymphocytes (Carballo et al., 1999)”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Carballo et al., 1999 source
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Antibody against IL-6, gp130 siRNA, or dominant-negative STAT3 enhance chemo-induced death in lymphoma and colon cancer.

    “Antibody against IL-6, gp130 siRNA, or dominant-negative STAT3 enhanced chemo-induced death in lymphoma (Gilbert and Hemann, 2010), as well as colon cancer (Yun et al., 2012)”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Gilbert and Hemann, 2010 source

      The Results section on Jak2 signaling (page unavailable) reports that Jak2/Jak3 inhibition removed protection against doxorubicin in lymphoma cells and improved outcomes in lymphoma-bearing mice. The cited paper does not report testing an anti-IL-6 antibody, gp130 siRNA, or dominant-negative STAT3 for this effect. The colon-cancer portion is attached to a different citation and is not attributed to Gilbert and Hemann. (LLM, conf=0.88)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites Yun et al., 2012 source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Both normal and tumor cells undergo senescence in response to various insults that cause persistent DNA damage.

    “Both normal and tumor cells undergo senescence in response to various insults that cause persistent DNA damage (Kuilman et al., 2010; Rodier and Campisi, 2011; Sikora et al., 2011; Ohtani and Hara, 2013)”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim2 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Kuilman et al., 2010 source
    • cites Rodier and Campisi, 2011 source
    • cites Sikora et al., 2011 source
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Respiratory epithelial cell-specific STAT3-KO mice progress more rapidly than STAT3 wild-type mice to lung injury after exposure to 95% oxygen, indicating a hyperoxia-protective role for STAT3.

    “Respiratory epithelial cell–specific STAT3-KO mice progressed more rapidly than STAT3 wild-type mice to lung injury after exposure to 95% oxygen (Hokuto et al., 2004), indicating a hyperoxia-protective role for STAT3.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Hokuto et al., 2004 source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Population-based GWAS followed by meta-analysis and immunochip data have identified more than 160 loci linked to IBD susceptibility.

    “Population-based, genome-wide–association studies followed by subsequent meta-analysis of population-based, genome-wide–association studies and immunochip data have identified more than 160 loci linked to IBD susceptibility (Jostins et al., 2012).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Jostins et al., 2012 source
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    In mammalian cells, sorbitol-induced hyperosmolarity results in phosphorylation of JAK1, JAK2, and TYK2 and leads to activation of STAT1 and STAT3, independent of gp130, leading to formation of STAT1/STAT3 heterodimer complexes and increased DNA binding.

    “In mammalian cells, sorbitol-induced hyperosmolarity resulted in phosphorylation of JAK1, JAK2, and TYK2 and led to activation of STAT1 and STAT3, independent of gp130, leading to formation of STAT1/STAT3 heterodimer complexes and increased DNA binding (Gatsios et al., 1998).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Gatsios et al., 1998 source

      Split into 2 atoms — 1 confirmed, 1 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    InS3-54 and HO-3867 specifically target the DNA-binding domain of STAT3, inhibit its binding to DNA, and block STAT3-mediated gene activation.

    “Other small-molecule inhibitors besides platinum-based compounds also have been identified, including InS3-54 and HO-3867, which specifically target the DNA-binding domain of STAT3, inhibit its binding to DNA, and block STAT3-mediated gene activation (Rath et al., 2014).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Rath et al., 2014 source

      In Results (‘DAPs target STAT3’; page not provided), the paper reports that HO-3867 is predicted to interact with STAT3’s DNA-binding domain, inhibits STAT3 DNA binding, and reduces a transcriptional reporter signal. The cited paper does not establish these claims for InS3-54; its experiments here concern HO-3867 and H-4073. (LLM, conf=0.90)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Both UC and CD are idiopathic chronic inflammatory diseases of the GI tract that cause substantial morbidity, occasional mortality, and a 20- to 30-fold increased risk of developing colorectal cancer.

    “Both are idiopathic chronic inflammatory diseases of the gastrointestinal (GI) tract that cause substantial morbidity, occasional mortality, and a 20- to 30-fold increased risk of developing colorectal cancer (CRC) (Kasembeli et al., 2018).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Kasembeli et al., 2018 source

      Section 3.1 (Overview; page unavailable) identifies UC and CD as forms of idiopathic gastrointestinal inflammatory bowel disease, lists symptoms consistent with substantial morbidity, and reports a 20- to 30-fold higher colorectal-cancer risk than in the general population. It does not state that UC and CD cause occasional mortality in patients; the mortality discussed in section 3.2 concerns mice with experimentally induced colitis. (LLM, conf=0.87)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Platinum IV compounds-CPA-1, CPA-7, IS3 295, and platinum (IV) tetrachloride-can inhibit STAT3 DNA-binding activity and inhibit cancer cell line growth.

    “Platinum IV compounds—CPA-1, CPA-7, IS3 295, and platinum (IV) tetrachloride—also can inhibit STAT3 DNA-binding activity and inhibit cancer cell line growth (Turkson et al., 2004).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Turkson et al., 2004 source

      The Introduction and the section on inhibition of in vitro Stat3 DNA-binding activity report that CPA-1, CPA-7, and platinum(IV) tetrachloride inhibit Stat3 DNA binding; the Introduction also reports growth inhibition in malignant cell lines. Our copy does not identify IS3 295 among the compounds tested (searched: “IS3 295” and “IS3-295”), so the claim is unsupported for that compound. Page numbers were not provided. (LLM, conf=0.88)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Nucleic acid-based drugs, including decoy oligonucleotides and, perhaps, G-quartet oligonucleotides, inhibit STAT3-mediated gene expression and inhibit growth of different cancer cell lines.

    “Nucleic acid–based drugs, including decoy oligonucleotides and, perhaps, G-quartet oligonucleotides, have been identified that inhibit STAT3-mediated gene expression and inhibit growth of different cancer cell lines (Leong et al., 2003; Lewis et al., 2008; Sun et al., 2008; Shen et al., 2009; Zhang et al., 2013b; Liu et al., 2014; Sen et al., 2014).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Leong et al., 2003 source
    • cites Lewis et al., 2008 source

      The Abstract reports that STAT3-binding-sequence oligonucleotides induced apoptosis in prostate and pancreatic cancer cell lines. The section ‘Anti-STAT3 Oligonucleotides Inhibited Expression of a STAT3-Regulated Gene, CD46’ reports reduced CD46 expression, supporting the gene-expression part of the claim. This paper does not establish the claim about G-quartet oligonucleotides. (LLM, conf=0.86)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites Sun et al., 2008 source
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    pS-STAT3 optimizes mitochondrial respiration and limits ROS formation from complex I following cardiac ischemia.

    “Of note, pS-STAT3 optimizes mitochondrial respiration and limits ROS formation from complex I following cardiac ischemia (Szczepanek et al., 2012).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Szczepanek et al., 2012 source

      Section 3.4 reports that mitochondria-targeted STAT3 modulates respiration and prevents the ischemia-induced rise in complex I–associated ROS; section 4 describes reduced ROS during ischemia. The passages do not establish that the STAT3 responsible is specifically serine-phosphorylated (pS-STAT3), and the reported ROS effect is during ischemia rather than specifically following it. (LLM, conf=0.84)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    STAT3 regulates both Th2 cell recruitment during allergic inflammation and the production of Th17 cells and the expansion and recruitment of neutrophils.

    “STAT3 is known to regulate both Th2 cell recruitment during allergic inflammation and the production of Th17 cells and the expansion and recruitment of neutrophils (Chen et al., 2007; Ma et al., 2008; Milner et al., 2008).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim2 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Chen et al., 2007 source

      The Introduction identifies STAT3 as a critical regulator of Th17 differentiation. It also links enhanced STAT3 activity after SOCS3 deletion to inflammatory disease with neutrophil infiltration, but does not establish that STAT3 regulates neutrophil expansion or recruitment. Its discussion of Th2 cells does not address STAT3-dependent recruitment during allergic inflammation. (LLM, conf=0.88)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites Ma et al., 2008

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

    • cites Milner et al., 2008 source

      The Abstract supports a crucial role for STAT3 signalling in TH17-cell generation and links loss of TH17 cells to impaired neutrophil recruitment, mobilization and influx. It does not establish that STAT3 regulates Th2-cell recruitment during allergic inflammation or neutrophil expansion. (LLM, conf=0.87)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Genetic and pharmacological inhibition of STAT3 signaling suppresses fibrosis in many animal models, including lung fibrosis where STAT3 haploinsufficiency eliminated increased lung collagen in bleomycin-treated mice.

    “Genetic and pharmacological inhibition of STAT3 signaling has been shown to suppress fibrosis in many animal models, including models of lung fibrosis, in which haploinsufficiency of STAT3 eliminated the increase in lung collagen (hydroxproline) content in bleomycin-treated mice”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites O’Donoghue et al., 2012 source

      The Results section, ‘Genetic restriction of Stat3 signalling ameliorates the fibrotic response in bleomycin-challenged mice’ (page unavailable), reports that Stat3+/− mice were completely protected from bleomycin-induced lung collagen deposition; Figure 6 identifies the collagen measure as lung hydroxyproline content. The paper supports this genetic lung-fibrosis example, but the cited passages do not establish that pharmacological STAT3 inhibition suppresses fibrosis across many animal models. (LLM, conf=0.86)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Ruxolitinib has promising activity in PMF patients, showing reduction in splenomegaly, improvement in disease-related symptoms, and increased overall survival compared with placebo or best available therapy.

    “Ruxolitinib, a JAK1/JAK2 inhibitor, has demonstrated promising activity in PMF patients, showing increased benefit across several end points, e.g., reduction in splenomegaly, improvement in disease-related symptoms, and increased overall survival, when compared with placebo or best available therapy”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim3 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Harrison et al., 2012 source

      The Conclusions report reduced splenomegaly and disease-related symptoms versus best available therapy, but state that an effect on overall survival had not been shown. The Discussion likewise says no overall-survival benefit was observed. This study included patients with primary and other forms of myelofibrosis; it did not compare ruxolitinib with placebo. (LLM, conf=0.90)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites Verstovsek et al., 2012 source

      The Results (Efficacy, page unavailable) report reduced spleen volume and improved symptoms in the PMF subgroup versus placebo. The Abstract (Results, page unavailable) reports better overall survival for the combined myelofibrosis population, not specifically for PMF. This trial compared ruxolitinib with placebo, not best available therapy. (LLM, conf=0.88)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites Vannucchi et al., 2015 source

      The Abstract (p. 1) reports reduced splenomegaly, improved disease-related symptoms, and prolonged survival with ruxolitinib compared with placebo or best available therapy. The Methods (p. 2) show that the trials included patients with primary myelofibrosis, but also patients with secondary myelofibrosis; the cited results are not reported specifically for the PMF subgroup. (LLM, conf=0.82)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    The JAK2 V617F gain-of-function mutation is present in about 95% of PV, 50-60% of ET, and about 50% of PMF patients and is associated with increased risk of mortality and splenomegaly.

    “the JAK2 gain-of-function mutation (V617F) has been suggested to play a prominent role in MPNs (Baxter et al., 2005; Levine et al., 2005), being present in in ∼95% of PV, 50% to 60% of ET, and ∼50% of all PMF patients and associated with increased risk of mortality and splenomegaly”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Baxter et al., 2005 source
    • cites Levine et al., 2005 source
    • cites Verstovsek, 2010 source
  • May combine two claims. The quote only partly states this claim.

    Premisecitation

    TTI-101 and S3I-201 block development of organ fibrosis in mouse models by reducing expression of fibrosis-mediating proteins and impairing myofibroblast differentiation.

    “Both TTI-101 and S3I-201 have been tested in several mouse models of fibrosis, including bleomycin-induced lung and skin fibrosis (scleroderma) and genetically-engineered models of scleroderma, as well as a model mouse of interstitial kidney fibrosis induced by unilateral ureteral obstruction, in which inhibition of STAT3 phosphorylation by these compounds blocks the development of organ fibrosis”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Pang et al., 2010 source
    • cites Pedroza et al., 2016 source
    • cites Chakraborty et al., 2017 source

      The Results section (page unavailable) reports that S3I-201 reduces skin fibrosis in two mouse models, along with myofibroblast differentiation and mRNA levels of fibrosis-related genes. The paper does not report testing TTI-101 or either compound in mouse models of lung or kidney fibrosis, so those parts of the attribution are unsupported. (LLM, conf=0.89)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    IL-6/STAT3 signaling is linked to muscle and adipose tissue wasting in mouse models of cachexia and has preliminary reinforcement in clinical studies.

    “The link between IL-6/STAT3 signaling and muscle and adipose tissue wasting is well established in mouse models of cachexia (White et al., 2011; Silva et al., 2015) and has been reinforced preliminarily in clinical studies.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim2 of 2 sources checked
    • cites White et al., 2011 source

      The Results section reports increased muscle STAT3 activation in cachectic ApcMin/+ mice and reduced activation after IL-6 receptor blockade; the Introduction also links IL-6 to muscle wasting. The paper does not establish a link to adipose tissue wasting. Its human evidence concerns reduced muscle protein synthesis after IL-6 administration, not clinical confirmation of the combined muscle-and-adipose claim. (LLM, conf=0.85)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites Silva et al., 2015 source

      The mouse experiments and Discussion support a link between STAT3 signaling and muscle wasting in cancer cachexia; the Discussion proposes IL-6 as one possible activator. The introductory passage reports mouse studies of IL-6-associated muscle and fat loss, but also calls those results controversial. It does not establish STAT3-mediated adipose wasting, and the cited paper provides no clinical evidence for the separate clause about clinical studies. (LLM, conf=0.85)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationcitation

    Transient IL-6/STAT3 helps maintain glucose homeostasis, while chronic IL-6/STAT3 signaling impairs insulin action, leading to insulin resistance and inflammation-associated glucose intolerance, probably through increased basal SOCS3 levels.

    “whereas transient IL-6/STAT3 seems to be helping maintain glucose homeostasis, chronic IL-6/STAT3 signaling impairs insulin action, leading to insulin resistance and inflammation-associated glucose intolerance, probably through an increase in basal SOCS3 levels”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim2 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Yang et al., 2012 source

      Split into 2 atoms — 0 confirmed, 1 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 1 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites Wunderlich et al., 2013 source
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    IL-6/JAK/STAT3 signaling is implicated in many solid tumors, promoting tumor growth and progression while hindering antitumor immunity.

    “The IL-6/JAK/STAT3 signaling pathway has also been implicated in many solid tumors, where it has been shown to promote tumor growth and progression while hindering antitumor immunity.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Johnson et al., 2018 source
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    In another Phase I trial of CDDO-Me in patients with advanced solid tumors and lymphomas, a complete tumor response occurred in one mantle cell lymphoma patient and a partial response was observed in an anaplastic thyroid carcinoma patient at a dose of 900 mg/day.

    “In another Phase I trial of CDDO-Me in patients with advanced solid tumors and lymphomas, a complete tumor response occurred in one mantle cell lymphoma patient and a partial response was observed in an anaplastic thyroid carcinoma patient at a dose of 900 mg/day.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Hong et al., 2012 source

      Split into 2 atoms — 1 confirmed, 1 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Elevated levels of STAT3 are observed in many solid and hematologic tumors, where its signaling underpins majority of cardinal features of cancer, including growth, antiapoptosis, transformation, angiogenesis, metastasis, and cancer stem cell maintenance.

    “Elevated levels of STAT3 have been observed in a large number of both solid and hematologic tumors, where its signaling underpins a majority of all known cardinal features of cancer (Yuan et al., 2015b), including growth and proliferation (Banerjee and Resat, 2016), antiapoptosis (Gritsko et al., 2006), cell transformation (Bromberg et al., 1999), angiogenesis (Doucette et al., 2012), metastasis (”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim2 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Yuan et al., 2015b

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

    • cites Banerjee and Resat, 2016 source
    • cites Gritsko et al., 2006 source
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Jakinibs are associated with immunosuppression, common early adverse effects include diarrhea, nasopharyngitis, headache, and urinary tract infection; prolonged treatment is associated with upper respiratory tract infections, nasopharyngitis, and bronchitis.

    “Jakinibs are associated with immunosuppression, and common early adverse effects include diarrhea, nasopharyngitis, headache, and urinary tract infection, whereas prolonged treatment has been associated with upper respiratory tract infections, nasopharyngitis, and bronchitis.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Bose et al., 2017 source
    • cites Kotyla, 2018 source

      Split into 2 atoms — 1 confirmed, 1 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    AZD9150 (danvatirsen) targets STAT3 and demonstrated antitumor activity in a Phase 1 dose-escalation study in patients with highly treatment-refractory lymphoma and NSCLC.

    “The naked, antisense, modified oligonucleotide, AZD9150 (danvatirsen), targets STAT3 and demonstrated antitumor activity in a Phase 1 dose-escalation study in patients with highly treatment-refractory lymphoma and NSCLC”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Hong et al., 2015 source
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    CDDO-Me inhibits constitutive and IL-6-induced JAK1 activity by directly binding to Cys1077 in the JAK1 kinase domain, blocking phosphorylation of STAT3 at Y705.

    “CDDO-Me inhibits constitutive and IL-6–induced JAK1 activity by directly binding to Cys1077 in the JAK1 kinase domain, thereby blocking its ability to phosphorylate STAT3 at Y705.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Ahmad et al., 2008 source

      The Discussion (page unavailable) says CDDO-Me inhibits IL-6-induced and constitutive JAK1 activity and supports a model in which binding at Cys1077 blocks JAK1 as an upstream effector of STAT3 phosphorylation. The ‘CDDO-Me interacts directly with JAK1’ section reports reduced binding after Cys1077 mutation and blocked JAK1-mediated STAT3 phosphorylation. Our copy does not specify Y705 as the phosphorylation site, so that detail is unsupported. (LLM, conf=0.86)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    STAT3 is implicated in chemotherapy resistance; there is a strong correlation between STAT3 activation and chemoresistance, and STAT3 inhibition restores sensitivity of tumors to chemotherapeutic drugs.

    “STAT3 has been implicated in chemotherapy resistance; there is a strong correlation between STAT3 activation and chemoresistance, and STAT3 inhibition has been shown to restore sensitivity of tumors to chemotherapeutic drugs”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Real et al., 2002 source
    • cites Huang et al., 2012 source
    • cites Sims et al., 2013 source

      The Results section (‘Imatinib potentiates doxorubicin-induced apoptosis by inhibiting STAT3-dependent survival pathways’; page unavailable) says STAT3 is implicated in chemoresistance and reports that silencing STAT3 enhanced doxorubicin-induced apoptosis in cancer cells. It does not establish a strong correlation between STAT3 activation and chemoresistance, and its cell-based doxorubicin findings do not demonstrate restored sensitivity of tumors to chemotherapeutic drugs generally. (LLM, conf=0.85)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    OPB-31121 showed a good pharmacokinetic profile but limited antitumor activity in patients with HCC, and long-term dosing resulted in high incidence of peripheral neuropathy.

    “This molecule developed by Otsuka Pharmaceutical (Tokyo, Japan) showed a good pharmacokinetic profile (Hayakawa et al., 2013; Kim et al., 2013b; Bendell et al., 2014; Brambilla et al., 2015), but demonstrated limited antitumor activity in patients with HCC (Bendell et al., 2014). Furthermore, long-term dosing resulted in a high incidence of peripheral neuropathy”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Hayakawa et al., 2013 source

      Hayakawa et al. is cited for the good pharmacokinetic profile; the HCC activity claim is cited to Bendell et al., and the neuropathy statement has no citation attached in the supplied sentence. The Results discuss oral dosing and common toxicities, while the Discussion says the HCC study was ongoing, but neither section reports pharmacokinetic measurements or assesses the drug's pharmacokinetic profile (searched: pharmacokinetics, exposure, bioavailability and half-life). (LLM, conf=0.75)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites Bendell et al., 2014 source
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    5 of 10 patients demonstrated clinical benefit, with one patient experiencing a partial clinical response (40% reduction in tumor sizes according to RECIST) for 12 months.

    “Importantly, 5 of 10 patients demonstrated clinical benefit, with one patient experiencing a partial clinical response (40% reduction in tumor sizes according to response evaluation criteria in solid tumors) for 12 months.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).

    Interpretationnone given

    JAK/STAT3 signaling functions can be delineated into two broad categories: those essential for normal cell and organ development and those activated in response to stress that are adaptive.

    “Key biological functions of Janus kinase (JAK)/signal transducer and activator of transcription (STAT)3 signaling can be delineated into two broad categories: those essential for normal cell and organ development and those activated in response to stress that are adaptive.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    The JAK/STAT pathway is evolutionarily conserved from Drosophila melanogaster through Homo sapiens.

    “The Janus kinase (JAK)/signal transducer and activator of transcription (STAT) signal transduction pathway is an evolutionarily conserved pathway present in Drosophila melanogaster through Homo sapiens (Hou et al., 2002).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Hou et al., 2002 source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Premisenone given

    The majority of disease-causing mutations in JAKs are located in the JH2 domain.

    “Not surprisingly, the majority of disease-causing mutations in JAKs are located in the JH2 domain.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Premisenone given

    Latent STAT3 is predominantly localized in the cytoplasm as homotypic N-terminal domain-to-N-terminal domain dimers.

    “Latent STAT3 is predominantly localized in the cytoplasm as homotypic N-terminal domain (NTD)-to-NTD dimers.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisenone given

    The N-terminal and SH2 domains are essential for dimerization that stabilizes the inactive and active conformations of STAT3, respectively.

    “The N-terminal and SH2 domains are essential for the dimerization that, respectively, stabilizes the inactive and active conformations of STAT3.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisereasoning

    STAT3 activation is achieved when cytokines or peptide hormones bind cell surface receptors, causing phosphorylation primarily at Y705, rearrangement of the dimer from NTD-to-NTD to SH2-to-SH2, nuclear localization, and transcriptional activation of specific genes.

    “STAT3 activation is achieved when cytokines or peptide hormones bind to cell surface receptors, orchestrating a series of events, including phosphorylation at key sites, primarily tyrosine (Y) 705,which leads to activation or rearrangement of the dimer from NTD-to-NTD to SH2-to-SH2, nuclear localization, and transcriptional activation of specific genes by binding to respective DNA elements at the”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    STAT3β lacks the transactivation domain due to alternative mRNA splicing, which confers prolonged nuclear retention compared with STAT3βΔ.

    “This domain is missing in the major alternative isoform of STAT3, STAT3β, due to alternative mRNA splicing that shifts the reading frame and replaces the 55-amino-acid residue TAD with seven distinct residues that confer prolonged nuclear retention to STAT3β compared with STAT3βΔ (Shao et al., 2001).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Shao et al., 2001 source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    More than 30 different cytokines in various tissue and cell systems have been implicated in canonical STAT3 signaling involving nuclear translocation and activation of transcription of its target genes.

    “More than 30 different cytokines in various tissue and cell systems have been implicated in the canonical signaling pathways of STAT3, involving nuclear translocation and activation of transcription of its target genes (Bharadwaj et al., 2016b).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Bharadwaj et al., 2016b

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    pS727 increases STAT3 binding to nuclear tyrosine phosphatase TC45, leading to rapid dephosphorylation of pY705 and shortening the duration of STAT3 activity.

    “Furthermore, pS727 increases STAT3 binding to nuclear tyrosine phosphatase TC45 (Wakahara et al., 2012), leading to rapid dephosphorylation of pY705, thereby shortening the duration of STAT3 activity.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Wakahara et al., 2012 source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    STAT3 is a member of a family of seven proteins known to play critical roles in cytokine and growth factor signaling.

    “STAT3 is a member of a family of seven proteins known to play critical roles in cytokine and growth factor signaling (Darnell, 2002).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Darnell, 2002 source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    STAT3 is structured into seven functional domains: N-terminal, coil-coiled, DNA-binding, linker, SH2, loop, and transactivation domains.

    “STAT3 is structured into seven functional domains (Fig. 3): 1) the globular N-terminal domain, 2) coil-coiled domain, 3) DNA-binding domain, 4) linker domain, 5) SH2 domain, 6) loop domain, and 7) transactivation domain, all of which play a role in STAT3 function (Shao et al., 2004).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Shao et al., 2004 source
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Macrophage- and neutrophil-specific STAT3 knockout causes high susceptibility to endotoxin shock and increased TNF-α, IL-1, and IFN-γ.

    “High susceptibility to endotoxin shock, ↑ TNF-α, IL-1, and IFN-γ”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Takeda et al., 1999 source
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    SOCS3 blocks IL-6 signaling by binding to gp130, limiting IL-6/pY-STAT3 activation, but does not inhibit the IL-10/pY-STAT3 axis, inducing prolonged STAT3 activation and promoting anti-inflammatory functions.

    “SOCS3 blocks IL-6 signaling by binding to gp130, thus limiting the IL-6/pY-STAT3 activation, but it does not inhibit IL-10/pY-STAT3 axis, inducing prolonged STAT3 activation”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Nakata et al., 2016 source
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    STAT3 is required for developmental transition of pre-pro-B cell progenitors to subsequent precursor populations and their survival.

    “STAT3 is required for developmental transition of pre-pro-B cell progenitors to subsequent precursor populations and their survival”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Chou et al., 2006 source
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Both IL-6 and IL-10 activate STAT3 but confer opposite effects because of differential effects of SOCS3.

    “Although both IL-6 and IL-10 activate STAT3, they confer opposite effects because of differential effects of SOCS3, induced by each”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Yasukawa et al., 2003 source
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Pretreatment of human platelets with the JAK3 inhibitor WHI-P131 markedly diminishes pY-STAT1 and pY-STAT3 levels and diminishes all markers of platelet activation, including shape change, pseudopod formation, degranulation, serotonin release, and platelet aggregation.

    “Pretreatment of human platelets with the JAK3 inhibitor, WHI-P131, markedly diminished pY-STAT1 and pY-STAT3 levels and diminished all markers of platelet activation, including shape change, pseudopod formation, degranulation, serotonin release, as well as platelet aggregation”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Tibbles et al., 2001 source
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    In a mouse model of thromboembolism induced by thromboplastin, treatment with WHI-P131 prolonged bleeding time and improved event-free survival.

    “treatment of mice with WHI-P131 prolonged bleeding time and improved event-free survival”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Tibbles et al., 2001 source
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Activation of STAT3 promotes transcription of IL-2 and perforin genes, thereby promoting natural killer cell activation.

    “Activation of STAT3 also promotes transcription of IL-2 and perforin genes, thereby promoting natural killer cell activation”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Zhao et al., 2003 source
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    STAT3 is essential for Th17 differentiation mediated by IL-6/TGF-β/IL-21 and by IL-23/STAT3.

    “STAT3 is also essential for Th17 differentiation mediated by IL-6/transforming growth factor (TGF)-β/IL-21”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Laurence et al., 2007 source
    • cites Nurieva et al., 2007 source
    • cites Yang et al., 2007b

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    IL-6/TGF-β combination helps Th17 differentiation through upregulating ectonucleotidases CD39 and CD73, which cleave extracellular ATP to produce immunosuppressive adenosine, and through TGF-β-mediated downregulation of Gfi-1.

    “IL-6/TGF-β combination, in contrast, helps Th17 differentiation through upregulating the ectonucleotidases, CD39 and CD73 (IL-6/STAT3 action), which cleave extracellular ATP to produce immunosuppressive adenosine production and TGF-β–mediated downregulation of the transcriptional repressor growth factor independent-1”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Rébé et al., 2013

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Mice with homozygous knock-in substitution of LepRb tyrosine residue Tyr1138 had decreased POMC and increased AgRP mRNA levels in the hypothalamus and displayed hyperphagia and decreased energy expenditure, leading to massive early-onset obesity associated with increased serum leptin levels.

    “Mice with homozygous knock-in substitution of LepRb tyrosine residue Tyr1138”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Bates et al., 2003 source
    • cites Bates and Myers, 2004 source
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    CD39-positive Th17 cells promote tumor growth, suggesting an immunosuppressive role in cancer.

    “CD39-pos Th17 cells promotes tumor growth, suggesting their immunosuppressive role in cancer”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Chalmin et al., 2012 source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Leptin regulates energy homeostasis, glucose and lipid metabolism, immune function, and other systems.

    “leptin, secreted by adipose tissue, regulates energy homeostasis, glucose and lipid metabolism, immune function, and other systems”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Hu et al., 2018

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Adipocyte-specific JAK2-KO mice have impaired lipolysis and increased body weight through decreased STAT3 activation, which results in insulin resistance with ageing.

    “adipocyte-specific JAK2-KO mice have impaired lipolysis and increased body weight through decreased STAT3 activation, which results in insulin resistance with ageing (Shi et al., 2014).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Shi et al., 2014 source
  • May combine two claims. The quote only partly states this claim.

    Premisecitation

    Following induction of differentiation, relative levels of pS-mtSTAT3 are markedly reduced in contrast to elevated levels of total cellular pS-STAT3, leading to increased complex I activity and increased ROS, which accelerates mitotic clonal expansion and increases differentiation efficiency of preadipocytes during adipogenesis.

    “following induction of differentiation, relative levels of pS-mtSTAT3 are markedly reduced in contrast to elevated levels of total cellular pS-STAT3”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Kramer et al., 2015 source
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Cigarette smoke extract induces IL-6 expression and increases levels of pY-STAT3 and STAT3-DNA binding in human bronchial epithelial cells, which protects these cells from apoptosis.

    “Cigarette smoke extract (CSE) induced IL-6 expression and increased levels of pY-STAT3 and STAT3-DNA binding in human bronchial epithelial cells (HBECs) (Liu, 2007), which protected these cells from apoptosis.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Liu, 2007 source
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    STAT3 augmentation may be a viable strategy to prevent hemorrhagic shock-mediated pathologies, resulting in decrease in mortality.

    “Thus, STAT3 augmentation may be a viable strategy to prevent hemorrhagic shock–mediated pathologies, resulting in decrease in mortality”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    LIF binding to its receptor and gp130 activates Akt, STAT3, and ERK1/2 and protects cardiomyocytes from oxidative and ischemic stress by acting on mitochondria and inducing gene transcription.

    “Leukemia inhibitory factor binding to its receptor and gp130 activates Akt, STAT3, and ERK1/2 and protects cardiomyocytes from oxidative and ischemic stress by acting on mitochondria and inducing gene transcription (Zouein et al., 2013b).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Zouein et al., 2013b

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Anti-IL-6 neutralizing antibody and STAT3 siRNA render HBECs sensitive to CSE-induced DNA damage, suggesting that STAT3 mediates HBEC survival in response to CSE-induced DNA damage.

    “Anti–IL-6 neutralizing antibody, as well as STAT3 small interfering RNA (siRNA), rendered HBECs sensitive to CSE-induced DNA damage, suggesting that STAT3 mediates HBEC survival in response to CSE-induced DNA damage (Liu, 2007).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Liu, 2007 source
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Overexpressing STAT3C in respiratory epithelial cells improves animal survival following hyperoxia and protects the lung from inflammation and injury through reducing mRNA levels of MMP9 and MMP12, and levels of adhesion molecules.

    “overexpressing of STAT3C (a constitutively active form of STAT3) in respiratory epithelial cells (Lian et al., 2005) improved animal survival following hyperoxia and protected the lung from inflammation and injury through reducing mRNA levels of matrix metalloproteases, e.g., matrix metalloproteinases (MMP)9 and MMP12, and levels of adhesion molecules”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Lian et al., 2005 source
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Increased production of IL-6 and G-CSF and activation of STAT3 occur early in rat lungs following resuscitation from hemorrhagic shock.

    “Increased production of IL-6 and granulocyte cell–stimulating factor and activation of STAT3 was found to occur early in rat lungs following resuscitation from hemorrhagic shock, a whole-body ischemia–reperfusion injury (Hierholzer et al., 1998b,c; Meng et al., 2000, 2001).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Hierholzer et al., 1998b,c

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

    • cites Meng et al., 2000 source
    • cites Meng et al., 2001 source
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Following DNA damage induced by topoisomerase I inhibition, STAT3 is phosphorylated by cdk5 at S727, but not Y705; pS-STAT3 transcriptionally upregulates Eme1, which reduces DNA damage.

    “Following DNA damage induced by topoisomerase I inhibition, STAT3 is phosphorylated by cdk5 at S727, but not Y705; pS-STAT3 transcriptionally upregulates Eme1, the endonuclease involved in DNA repair, which reduces DNA damage (Courapied et al., 2010).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Courapied et al., 2010 source
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisenone given

    Excessive JAK activity has been linked to numerous disorders, including inflammatory diseases such as psoriasis and inflammatory bowel disease; myeloproliferative diseases, e.g., polycythemia vera; and hematologic malignancies, including myeloid leukemia and multiple myeloma.

    “Excessive JAK activity has been linked to numerous disorders, including inflammatory diseases such as psoriasis and inflammatory bowel disease; myeloproliferative diseases, e.g., polycythemia vera (PV); and hematologic malignancies, including myeloid leukemia and multiple myeloma.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Following I/R injury, cardiomyocyte-specific STAT3-KO mice have greater infarct size and cardiomyocyte apoptosis.

    “Following I/R injury (Hilfiker-Kleiner et al., 2004), cardiomyocyte-specific STAT3-KO mice had greater infarct size and cardiomyocyte apoptosis”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Hilfiker-Kleiner et al., 2004 source
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    In cardiomyocyte-targeted STAT3-KO mice, cardiac STAT3 depletion does not affect infarct size, but STAT3 is crucial for cardiac preconditioning.

    “Studies with cardiomyocyte-targeted STAT3-KO mice reveal that although cardiac STAT3 depletion did not affect infarct size, STAT3 is crucial for cardiac preconditioning (Smith et al., 2004).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Smith et al., 2004 source
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Several approaches to reduce STAT3 activity have been proposed and include targeting specific receptors or receptor-associated kinases, especially JAKs, upstream of STAT3, in addition to strategies to directly interfere with STAT3 activity by preventing its recruitment to receptors, dimerization, nuclear localization, and DNA binding.

    “Several approaches to reduce STAT3 activity have been proposed and include targeting of specific receptors or receptor-associated kinases, especially JAKs, upstream of STAT3, in addition to strategies to directly interfere with STAT3 activity by preventing its recruitment to receptors, dimerization, nuclear localization, and DNA binding [see Bharadwaj et al. (2016b)].”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Bharadwaj et al. (2016b)

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Prolonged elevated glucose can signal as a cell stressor through multiple pathways, including hyperosmolarity, PKC activation, and oxidative damage, likely involving pS-STAT3, as well as pY-STAT3.

    “Prolonged elevated glucose could also signal as a cell stressor through multiple pathways, including hyperosmolarity (McGinn et al., 2003), protein kinase C (PKC) activation (Mandarino, 1992), and oxidative damage (Nishikawa et al., 2000), likely involving pS-STAT3, as well as pY-STAT3.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites McGinn et al., 2003 source
    • cites Mandarino, 1992 source
    • cites Nishikawa et al., 2000 source
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Manifestations of dextran sulfate sodium-induced colitis are more severe in STAT3Δβ/Δβ transgenic mice, which express only STAT3α, indicating that a STAT3 activity globally contributes to dextran sulfate sodium-induced colitis.

    “Manifestations of dextran sulfate sodium–induced colitis were more severe in STAT3Δβ/Δβ transgenic mice, which express only STAT3α (Maritano et al., 2004; Marino et al., 2014), indicating that a STAT3 activity globally contributes to dextran sulfate sodium–induced colitis.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Maritano et al., 2004 source
    • cites Marino et al., 2014
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationcitation

    JAK-STAT inhibitor treatment improves constitutional symptoms and reduces splenomegaly but shows only modest benefit in reduction of clonal burden, suggesting clinical benefit may arise from modulation of JAK-STAT signaling not associated with the expanded mutant clone(s).

    “whereas JAK-STAT inhibitor treatment leads to improvement in constitutional symptoms and reduced splenomegaly, they show only modest benefit in reduction of clonal burden (Deininger et al., 2015), suggesting that the bulk of the observed clinical benefit of these inhibitors may arise from modulation of JAK-STAT signaling not associated with the expanded mutant clone(s).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Deininger et al., 2015 source
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Bardoxolone is toxic to mitochondria, inhibiting mitochondrial electron transport via perturbations in inner mitochondrial membrane integrity, with implications for patient toxicity.

    “bardoxolone has been found to be toxic to mitochondria, as it inhibits mitochondrial electron transport via perturbations in inner mitochondrial membrane integrity (Samudio et al., 2006), which, as with the Otsuka compounds described above, has implications for toxicity of this agent in patients.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Samudio et al., 2006 source
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Grade 3 TEAE were GI-related (7.3%) and fatigue (2.4%).

    “Grade 3 TEAE were GI-related (7.3%) and fatigue (2.4%).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Jonker et al., 2014 source
    • cites Laurie et al., 2014 source
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Napabucasin downregulates expression of genes associated with cancer cell stemness and kills cells exhibiting properties of cancer cell stemness in various types of cancers.

    “It has been shown to downregulate expression of genes associated with cancer cell stemness and to kill cells exhibiting properties of cancer cell stemness in various types of cancers.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Li et al., 2015

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Nrf2 is an oxidative stress response transcription factor known to activate a variety of cytoprotective genes.

    “Inhibition of Keap1 leads to activation of the nuclear factor erythroid 2–related factor 2, an oxidative stress response transcription factor known to activate a variety of cytoprotective genes (Wang et al., 2014).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Wang et al., 2014
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Dose escalation of napabucasin was stopped because of pill burden, and no maximum tolerated dose was established.

    “Dose escalation was stopped because of pill burden, and no maximum tolerated dose was established.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Jonker et al., 2014 source
    • cites Laurie et al., 2014 source
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Preclinical studies in mouse models of several cancers show that napabucasin was effective both as monotherapy and in combination with other agents, particularly paclitaxel where synergy was observed.

    “Preclinical studies in mouse models of several cancers show that napabucasin was effective both as monotherapy and in combination with other agents, particularly paclitaxel where synergy was observed.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Garcia et al., 2016 source
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    No new AE or pharmacokinetic interactions were observed when napabucasin was combined with paclitaxel.

    “Notably, no new AE or pharmacokinetic interactions were observed when napabucasin was combined with paclitaxel.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Garcia et al., 2016 source
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    STAT3 inhibitors that reduced levels of pY-STAT3 would be expected to increase U-STAT3 levels, if only slightly, and would be expected to have minimal impact on the activity of U-STAT3.

    “In contrast, STAT3 inhibitors that reduced levels of pY-STAT3 would be expected to increase U-STAT3 levels, if only slightly, and would be expected to have minimal impact on the activity of U-STAT3.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Each hit inhibited STAT3 binding to its pY-peptide ligand, thereby blocking two steps in STAT3 activation-recruitment to activated receptor complexes and homodimerization.

    “TTI-101 (C188-9) emerged from a structure-based, drug-design program that began with computer-based docking of 920,000 compounds into the SH2 domain of STAT3 and identified three hits (C3, C30, and C188) (Xu et al., 2009); each hit inhibited STAT3 binding to its pY-peptide ligand, thereby blocking two steps in STAT3 activation—recruitment to activated receptor complexes and homodimerization.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Xu et al., 2009

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Pyrimethamine currently is marketed for the treatment of parasitic diseases and is under evaluation in Phase I/II clinical trials in Europe for a number of cancer indications, including CLL and triple-negative breast cancer.

    “Pyrimethamine currently is marketed for the treatment of parasitic diseases and is under evaluation in Phase I/II clinical trials in Europe for a number of cancer indications, including CLL and triple-negative breast cancer.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites EU Clinical Trials Register, 2017

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Jakinibs have been successfully introduced into the clinic and will continue to be useful in the treatment of several inflammatory and neoplastic conditions for the foreseeable future.

    “Jakinibs have been successfully introduced into the clinic, as described above, and, for the foreseeable future, they will continue to be useful in the treatment of several inflammatory and neoplastic conditions.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    WP-1066 is a potent inhibitor of JAK2 and downstream STAT3 signaling.

    “WP-1066 is a potent inhibitor of JAK2 and downstream STAT3 signaling.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Bharadwaj et al., 2016b

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Interpretationnone given

    Their toxicities, although for the most part manageable, are the major impediment to their broader use.

    “Their toxicities, although for the most part manageable, are the major impediment to their broader use, however.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    The future of STAT3 inhibitors as therapies for inflammatory and fibrotic disorders and for cancer is promising, but caution is urged especially with regard to achieving sufficient target engagement, especially in the setting of cancer, and the avoidance of toxicity, especially in noncancer indications.

    “The future of STAT3 inhibitors as therapies for inflammatory and fibrotic disorders and for cancer is promising, but caution is urged especially with regard to achieving sufficient target engagement, especially in the setting of cancer, and the avoidance of toxicity, especially in noncancer indications.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
119 of 119
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The adaptive versus maladaptive categorization of JAK/STAT3 signaling is sufficient to guide safe therapeutic targeting.

    “Key biological functions of Janus kinase (JAK)/signal transducer and activator of transcription (STAT)3 signaling can be delineated into two broad categories: those essential for normal cell and organ development and those activated in response to stress that are adaptive.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The cited animal and human studies are predictive of human disease mechanisms and therapeutic outcomes.

    “In this review, we will summarize the molecular and cellular biology of JAK/STAT3 signaling and its functions under basal and stress conditions, which are adaptive, and then review maladaptive JAK/STAT3 signaling in animals and humans that lead to disease, as well as recent attempts to modulate them to treat these diseases.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Findings from mouse models of STAT3 deletion or mutation can be extrapolated to human STAT3 biology and disease.

    “STAT3 dysfunction in any direction could cause pathophysiological alterations in mice and humans”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Findings from mouse models and cell lines about JAK/STAT3 function translate to human disease.

    “The data summarized above suggest that targeting JAK and STAT3 with small-molecule inhibitors may provide a superior anti-asthma treatment approach compared with standard therapies as, they would target both Th2- and Th17-associated asthmas (Choy et al., 2015).”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The therapeutic effects of STAT3 inhibitors are primarily due to on-target inhibition of STAT3 rather than off-target effects.

    “It should, however, be noted that not all the molecules identified as STAT3 inhibitors are competitive inhibitors. Some, such as Stattic and some members of the S3I-201 family of compounds, inhibit STAT3 by covalently reacting with residues (largely cysteines) at key locations within STAT3, as well as other off-target proteins (Heidelberger et al., 2013; Ball et al., 2016).”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Mouse models of cachexia predict human cachexia.

    “The link between IL-6/STAT3 signaling and muscle and adipose tissue wasting is well established in mouse models of cachexia (White et al., 2011; Silva et al., 2015) and has been reinforced preliminarily in clinical studies.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Mouse models of fibrosis predict human fibrosis.

    “Genetic and pharmacological inhibition of STAT3 signaling has been shown to suppress fibrosis in many animal models, including models of lung fibrosis, in which haploinsufficiency of STAT3 eliminated the increase in lung collagen (hydroxproline) content in bleomycin-treated mice”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Findings in preclinical cancer models translate to human cancer.

    “Inhibition of STAT3 activation in many preclinical cancer models results in increased apoptosis and decreased proliferation.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The only curative treatment for PMF is allogenic hematopoietic cell transplantation, and long-term survival is hampered by relapse and/or graft-versus-host disease, leaving an unmet need for targeted therapies.

    “Currently, the only curative treatment option for PMF is allogenic hematopoietic cell transplantation, but long-term survival is usually hampered by disease relapse and/or graft-versus-host disease, leaving the unmet need to develop targeted therapies for PMF, e.g., JAK/STAT pathway inhibition.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Lactic acidosis is a clinical laboratory marker of mitochondrial dysfunction.

    “Of note, lactic acidosis is a clinical laboratory marker of mitochondrial dysfunction.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    In Phase I/II trials of CDDO-Me in patients with moderate to severe chronic kidney disease, data demonstrated a significant increase from baseline in estimated glomerular filtration rate.

    “Data from these studies demonstrated a significant increase from baseline in estimated glomerular filtration rate, a measure of improved kidney function, which suggested that CDDO-Me may be beneficial in these patients.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    No new adverse events or pharmacokinetic interactions occur when napabucasin is combined with paclitaxel.

    “Notably, no new AE or pharmacokinetic interactions were observed when napabucasin was combined with paclitaxel.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Most forms of post-translationally modified STAT3 proteins are modified after their phosphorylation at key tyrosine sites.

    “Most forms of post-translational modified STAT3 proteins, including those that that are phosphorylated on serine, methylated, acetylated, ubiquitinated, ISGylated, and SUMOylated, are modified after their phosphorylation at key tyrosine sites.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The scaffold function of STAT3 in platelet activation is mediated by homodimers of pY-STAT3.

    “Similarly, because the scaffold function of STAT3 in platelet activation is mediated by homodimers of pY-STAT3, STAT3 inhibitors that reduce pY-STAT3 could potentially reduce platelet function in inflamed tissue, such as a ruptured atherosclerotic plaque.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The activity of STAT3 in the ER does not require STAT3 to be phosphorylated at Y705.

    “Similarly, because the activity of STAT3 in the ER does not require STAT3 to be phosphorylated at Y705, the impact of reduced pY-STAT3 on the ER function of STAT3 is expected to be minimal.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    STAT3 has a critical role in wound healing.

    “In addition, based on the critical role of STAT3 in wound healing, it would be advisable to avoid the use of STAT3 inhibitors in the period immediately prior to surgery or following traumatic injury until wound healing is complete.”
16 of 16

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.

  • Ghrelin is said to reduce feeding despite opposing leptin

    Minor

    The paper says ghrelin opposes leptin to downregulate feeding behavior, but elsewhere says leptin activation decreases food intake. Opposing that effect would increase, not decrease, feeding.

  • Chemotherapy-induced senescence is described as both autocrine and paracrine

    Minor

    Table 2 calls the IL-6/STAT3 effect autocrine, whereas the discussion describes the same chemotherapy-induced senescence and residual tumor burden as paracrine.

2 of 2

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

14 of the 623 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Simeone-Penney, 2008, STAT3: A Novel Regulator of Airway Inflammation and Remodeling in Asthma in Sackler School of Graduate Biomedical Sciences, Tuft University (MA), ProQuest Dissertations Publishing, 2008

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bharadwaj, U., Kasembeli, M. M., Robinson, P., & Tweardy, D. J.
Affiliations
The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center (US)
Venue
Pharmacological Reviews
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2020-04
Volume
72
Issue
2
Pages
486-526
ISSN
0031-6997 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3011547660
Cited by
314
References
623
Citations by year
2026: 38 · 2025: 56 · 2024: 56 · 2023: 55 · 2022: 50 · 2021: 46 · 2020: 13
FWCI
13.16
Type
journal article
Language
en
Update notices
erratum (2020-07-01)
Open access
Locations
  • Pharmacological Reviews (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (1p50ca221707-01a1)
  • National Cancer Institute (P50CA221707)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cytokine Signaling Pathways and Interactions
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cancer Research › NF-κB Signaling Pathways
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Tyrosine Phosphatases
Keywords
Janus kinase, STAT3, JAK/STAT signaling, cytokine signaling, acute phase response, chronic inflammation, fibrosis, cancer, mitochondrial function, platelet activation, endothelial permeability, drug safety, therapeutic targeting, cachexia, oxidative phosphorylation, innate immunity
MeSH terms
Animals, Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Antineoplastic Agents, Fibrosis, Humans, Inflammation, Neoplasms, Phosphorylation, Clinical Trials, Phase II as Topic, Protein Kinase Inhibitors, STAT3 Transcription Factor, Janus Kinases, Molecular Targeted Therapy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Claims read by deepseek-v4.1-flash under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-10-23.

Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-10-23.

Cited sources are checked by gpt-6-sol.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review