The DOI matches its Crossref record; 8 of the 8 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Using Lewin’s Force Field Analysis in Implementing a Nursing Information System
Abstract
Change is a regular occurrence in the healthcare environment. The computerization of nursing systems is one aspect of the changes taking place in the information revolution. As a result, nurses have widely varying attitudes toward computers and change in the workplace. To transition the nursing team effectively from one system to another, the nurse informaticist must be aware of the factors that encourage and those that impede the change. Strategies must be developed to assist nurses in moving forward with the transition. This article presents a theoretical discussion of how Lewin's Force Field Analysis Model could be applied in the practice setting to implement a nursing information system successfully.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Nurses who have positive views and attitudes toward AI are more likely to feel comfortable using AI applications and they view AI and other technology applications as useful and easy to use.28,29”
From Exploring nurses’ awareness and attitudes toward artificial intelligence: implications for nursing practice (2024) · cites this paper as [29]
In the citing paper
“Younger nurses tend to hold more positive attitudes toward technology in general compared to elder nurses. 29”
From Exploring nurses’ awareness and attitudes toward artificial intelligence: implications for nursing practice (2024) · cites this paper as [29]
Citations
Cites
Attitudes of Australian nurses toward the implementation of a clinical information system.
Marasovic, C., Kenney, C., Elliott, D., & Sindhusake, D. P. (1997) · PubMed · Cited by 81
Nurses' attitudes toward computerization in clinical practice in a British general hospital.
Simpson, G., & Kenrick, M. (1997) · PubMed · Cited by 63
Nurses' attitudes towards computerization in clinical practice
Sultana, N. (1990) · Journal of Advanced Nursing · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2648.1990.tb01893.x · Cited by 47
Pediatric nurses' pain management practice: barriers to change.
Ely, B. (2002) · PubMed · Cited by 46
Understanding Staff Nurse Responses to Change
Schoolfield, M., & Orduña, A. (1994) · Clinical Nurse Specialist · doi:10.1097/00002800-199401000-00018 · Cited by 36
Employee response to major organizational redesign
Ingersoll, G. L., Fisher, M. L., Ross, B., et al. (2001) · Applied Nursing Research · doi:10.1053/apnr.2001.21075 · Cited by 28
Health Information Systems: Challenges for the 21st Century
Ball, M. J., & Lillis, J. (2000) · AACN Clinical Issues Advanced Practice in Acute & Critical Care · doi:10.1097/00044067-200008000-00006 · Cited by 19
Hospital information systems. Nursing's integral role.
Glancey, T. S., Brooks, G. M., & Vaughan, V. S. (1990) · PubMed · Cited by 2
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 6
- Ely, 2001, Pediatr Nurs, 27, 473
- Brodt, 1986, Comput Nurs, 4, 18
- Simpson, 1997, Comput Nurs, 15, 37
- Marasovic, 1997, Comput Nurs, 15, 91
- McBride, 1996, Comp Nurs, 14, 164
- Glancy, 1990, Comput Nurs, 8, 55
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Alruwaili, M. M., Abuadas, F. H., Alsadi, M., Alruwaili, A. N., Elsayed Ramadan, O. M., Shaban, M., Al Thobaity, A., Alkahtani, S. M., & El Arab, R. A. (2024) · DIGITAL HEALTH · doi:10.1177/20552076241271803 · Cited by 114
“28,29 The fi ndings of this study indicate that a considerable proportion of nurses hold conservative attitudes toward AI, which encompasses a spectrum of hesitancy from mild caution to signi fi cant resistance against the integration of AI technologies in nursing practices.”
Background
Metadata
- Authors
- BOZAK, M. G.
- Affiliations
- University of South Florida (US)
- Corresponding author
- BOZAK, MARILYNN G.
- Venue
- CIN: Computers, Informatics, Nursing
- Published
- 2003-03
- Volume
- 21
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 80-85
- ISSN
- 1538-2931 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2092369593
- Cited by
- 89
- References
- 8
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 2
- FWCI
- 12.80
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- CIN Computers Informatics Nursing (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Nursing › Research and Theory › Nursing Diagnosis and Documentation
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Electronic Health Records Systems
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Organizational Change and Leadership
- Keywords
- nursing information systems, organizational change, change implementation
- MeSH terms
- Attitude of Health Personnel, Attitude to Computers, Computer Systems, Education, Nursing, Continuing, Humans, Nursing Staff, Models, Nursing
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
