Cited by 113

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Cell-surface heparan sulfate proteoglycans: dynamic molecules mediating ligand catabolism

Jon Williams, Kevin, Fuki, Ilia V.·1997·Current Opinion in Lipidology

Abstract

Though sometimes regarded as merely passive, space-filling components, proteoglycans are in fact metabolically active molecules with carbohydrate and protein domains that are highly conserved throughout evolution, indicating specific, crucial functions. Here we review recent evidence that heparan sulfate proteoglycans, particularly syndecans and perlecan, are able to mediate directly the internalization of lipoproteins and other ligands, without requiring the participation of LDL receptor family members. Thus, heparan sulfate proteoglycans can function as receptors. In the case of syndecan heparan sulfate proteoglycans, efficient internalization is triggered by clustering of the transmembrane and cytoplasmic domains and then proceeds through a noncoated pit pathway, possibly caveolae. The physiologic and pathophysiologic importance of these direct heparan sulfate proteoglycan-mediated catabolic pathways in the liver and in the arterial wall in vivo remains to be settled.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/00041433-199710000-00003

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Jon Williams, K., & Fuki, I. V.
Venue
Current Opinion in Lipidology
Published
1997-10
Volume
8
Issue
5
Pages
253-262
ISSN
0957-9672
Cited by
113
References
0
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review