Optimizing LDL-C Lowering With Statins
Abstract
Clinical studies have demonstrated the efficacy of statins in reducing low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) and lowering coronary heart disease risk. However, many patients receiving statin therapy in clinical practice are not achieving their LDL-C goals. Generally, statins are initiated at starting doses, and doses should be titrated as needed until the goal of therapy is achieved or a second lipid-lowering drug is required; titration is required in the majority of patients who receive less efficacious agents. Most patients receiving statin therapy in clinical practice are maintained on their starting dose, and this frequently results in inadequate control of elevated cholesterol levels. A number of factors may limit dose titration in clinical practice, including the cost of therapy, safety of prescribing statins at high doses and the additional office visits required for evaluations and monitoring. There may be several solutions to this problem. The choice of statin appears to be one of the important factors influencing the success of therapy. Selecting a statin that provides greater LDL-C lowering enables more patients to achieve LDL-C goals, and the majority of patients can be effectively treated with starting doses of the more efficacious statins. Another factor influencing the success of therapy is the willingness to add other drugs to a statin to enhance LDL-C lowering. Choices here include niacin, a bile acid sequestrant, and ezetimibe, a new cholesterol absorp…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Statins are effective, safe, and affordable but fail to meet LDL-C goals or are poorly tolerated by some patients.
“The primary choice of statins works well due to their effectiveness and safety as well as affordability, but they fail to meet LDL-C goals or are poorly tolerated by patients [74–76].”
Cites
Second Joint Task Force of European (1998) · European Heart Journal · doi:10.1053/euhj.1998.1243 · Cited by 1,131 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Satyam, S. M., El-Tanani, M., Patni, M. A., Rehman, A., Irshad, S. M., Raheem, R., Junais, E., John, A. A., Rassal, R. Y., Kumari, R., et al. (2026) · BMC Cardiovascular Disorders · doi:10.1186/s12872-026-05515-3 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
“The primary choice of statins works well due to their effectiveness and safety as well as affordability, but they fail to meet LDL-C goals or are poorly tolerated by patients [74–76].”
- Authors
- McKenney, J. M.
- Affiliations
- Virginia Commonwealth University (US)
- Corresponding author
- McKenney, James M.
- Venue
- American Journal of Therapeutics
- Published
- 2004-01
- Volume
- 11
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 54-59
- ISSN
- 1075-2765 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2044564545
- Cited by
- 27
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 1 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 3
- FWCI
- 0.46
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- American Journal of Therapeutics (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Lipoproteins and Cardiovascular Health
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Cholesterol and Lipid Metabolism
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cancer Research › Cancer, Lipids, and Metabolism
- Keywords
- statins, LDL cholesterol lowering, LDL-C goal attainment, statin dose titration, starting dose, statin selection, combination lipid-lowering therapy, ezetimibe, nicotinic acid, bile acid sequestrants, cholesterol absorption inhibitors, coronary heart disease risk, hypercholesterolemia
- MeSH terms
- Hypolipidemic Agents, Coronary Disease, Dose-Response Relationship, Drug, Drug Therapy, Combination, Humans, Hyperlipidemias, Cholesterol, LDL, Practice Patterns, Physicians', Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic, Treatment Outcome, Hydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase Inhibitors
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review