Cited by 67Blood Pressure and Hypertension StudiesCardiovascular Health and Disease PreventionNon-Invasive Vital Sign Monitoring

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

The International Database of Self-Recorded Blood Pressures in normotensive and untreated hypertensive subjects

Thijs, Lutgarde, Staessen, Jan A., Celis, Hilde, Fagard, Robert, Cort, Paul De, de Gaudemaris, Régis, Enström, Inger, lmai, Yutaka, Julius, Stevo, Ménard, Joël, Mion, Décio, Palatini, Paolo, Shapiro, David, Spence, David, Stergiou, George·1999·Blood Pressure Monitoring

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To pool data from individual subjects in an attempt to determine an operational threshold for making clinical decisions based on the self-recorded blood pressure (SRBP) and to examine how many hypertensive subjects, diagnosed by conventional blood pressure (CBP) measurement, would have a self-recorded blood pressure within the normotensive range if the proposed thresholds were applied. DATA SOURCES: Thirteen research groups studied 4668 untreated subjects. RESULTS: In total 2401 subjects were normotensive, 494 were borderline hypertensive and 1773 were definitely hypertensive. Hypertension had been diagnosed from the mean of 1-6 (median 3) CBP measurements obtained during 1-3 (median 1) visits. The reference values for SRBP measurements determined from the 95th percentiles of the distributions for normotensive subjects were 137 mmHg systolic and 85 mmHg diastolic. Of the subjects with systolic hypertension, 16% had systolic SRBP </= 137 mmHg. Similarly, 25% of those with diastolic hypertension had diastolic SRBP </= 85 mmHg. The probability that hypertensive subjects had SRBP below these thresholds was 34% (diastolic) to 62% (systolic) greater for women than it was for men, was 2-3 times greater if fewer than three CBP measurements had been averaged for establishing the diagnosis of hypertension, and increased by 50% (diastolic) to 126% (systolic) when SRBP had been measured on more than 3 days. In contrast, for each 10 mmHg increment in systolic CBP, this probability decreased by 35% for systolic SRBP and by 11% for diastolic SRBP; for each 5 mmHg increment in diastolic CBP it decreased by 36% for diastolic SRBP. In addition, for systolic blood pressure, the probability decreased by 31% for each 10-year increment in age. CONCLUSIONS: Until the relationship between SRBP and the incidence of cardiovascular morbidity and mortality has been clarified further by prospective studies, a mean self-recorded blood pressure above 137 mmHg systolic or 85 mmHg diastolic may be considered hypertensive. Among the hypertensive patients 16-31% had SRBP below these thresholds, but this proportion decreased if the hypertensive subjects had higher CBP.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/00126097-199902000-00004

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Thijs, L., Staessen, J. A., Celis, H., Fagard, R., Cort, P. D., de Gaudemaris, R., Enström, I., lmai, Y., Julius, S., Ménard, J., Mion, D., Palatini, P., Shapiro, D., Spence, D., & Stergiou, G.
Affiliations
  • KU Leuven (BE)
  • Lund University (SE)
  • University of Michigan (US)
  • Universidade de São Paulo (BR)
  • Assistance Publique – Hôpitaux de Paris (FR)
  • University of Padua (IT)
  • Tel Aviv University (IL)
  • University of California, Los Angeles (US)
  • Cornell University (US)
Venue
Blood Pressure Monitoring
Published
1999-02
Volume
4
Issue
2
Pages
77-86
ISSN
1359-5237 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2080122166
Cited by
67
References
0
Citations by year
2023: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 8
FWCI
1.91
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Blood Pressure Monitoring (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Blood Pressure and Hypertension Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiovascular Health and Disease Prevention
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Non-Invasive Vital Sign Monitoring
Keywords
untreated hypertension, normotension, hypertension diagnosis, reference values, blood pressure thresholds, borderline hypertension, sex differences, age effects, measurement frequency, cardiovascular risk stratification, pooled analysis, systolic and diastolic blood pressure
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Blood Pressure, Blood Pressure Determination, Female, Humans, Hypertension, Male, Middle Aged, Databases, Factual

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review