Cited by 180Schizophrenia research and treatmentTreatment of Major DepressionPharmacogenetics and Drug Metabolism

A Visual Guide to Expected Blood Levels of Long-Acting Injectable Risperidone in Clinical Practice

WILSON, WILLIAM H.·2004·Journal of Psychiatric Practice

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Risperidone is the only second-generation (atypical) antipsychotic medication available in a long-acting injectable formulation. The mechanism of drug delivery and the pharmacokinetics of this medication are distinctively different from the first-generation injectable depot medications. Antipsychotic blood levels have been reported in carefully managed single-dose and multiple-dose studies of long-acting risperidone. However, there have been no studies of blood levels produced by the variability in doses and schedules that may occur in clinical practice. Mathematical modeling allows for estimation of blood levels in a variety of clinical scenarios that have yet to be studied empirically. This paper presents mathematically modeled representations of antipsychotic blood levels in clinical situations with long-acting risperidone, with the goal of helping professionals, patients, and family members make informed decisions regarding treatment. METHODS: A model of single-dose pharmacokinetics was derived from a published, empirical single-dose study. The model was used to prepare graphs of expected multiple-dose schedules consistent with clinical situations, using empirically validated assumptions. RESULTS: The model was validated by comparison of the results of multiple-dose modeling with published empirical multi-dose data. Graphs of expected blood levels in several clinical situations are presented. Future empirical studies are required to fully validate these results. CONCLUSIONS: Mathematical models of antipsychotic blood levels in various common situations allow a better appreciation of the novel pharmacokinetics of long-acting injectable risperidone, which may lead to more informed decision-making.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/00131746-200411000-00009

Cites

11 of 11 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
WILSON, W. H.
Affiliations
Oregon Health & Science University (US)
Corresponding author
WILSON, WILLIAM H.
Venue
Journal of Psychiatric Practice
Published
2004-11
Volume
10
Issue
6
Pages
393-401
ISSN
  • 1527-4160 (ISSN-L)
  • 1538-1145
OpenAlex
W2093439082
Cited by
180
References
11
Citations by year
2025: 4 · 2023: 1 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 158 · 2019: 1 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 3
FWCI
0.41
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Psychiatric Practice (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Schizophrenia research and treatment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Treatment of Major Depression
  • Life Sciences › Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics › Pharmacology › Pharmacogenetics and Drug Metabolism
Keywords
long-acting injectable risperidone, atypical antipsychotics, pharmacokinetics, blood concentration, mathematical modeling, dose variation, clinical decision-making, antipsychotic dosing
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Decision Making, Dose-Response Relationship, Drug, Female, Humans, Male, Models, Theoretical, Schizophrenia, Antipsychotic Agents, Guidelines as Topic, Risperidone

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review