Cited by 129Pressure Ulcer Prevention and ManagementNeonatal skin health careWound Healing and Treatments

The 2003 National Pediatric Pressure Ulcer and Skin Breakdown Prevalence Survey: A Multisite Study

McLane, Kathleen M., Bookout, Kimberly, McCord, Shannon, McCain, Jean, Jefferson, Larry S.·2004·Journal of Wound, Ostomy and Continence Nursing

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to document the prevalence of pressure ulcers and other types of skin breakdown in hospitalized children. DESIGN: This descriptive study included documentation of findings from chart reviews and physical assessments of children. SETTING AND SUBJECTS: Nine children's hospitals from throughout the United States participated for a total sample of 1064 children. Subjects were inpatients in the children's hospitals between the ages of neonate to 17 years. INSTRUMENTS: The data collection tools included the interrater reliability quiz, the patient data collection form, FAST data collection software, the Braden Q Risk Assessment Scale, and the Neonatal/Infant Braden Q Risk Assessment Scale. METHODS: Prevalence of pressure ulcers and skin breakdown was measured on a predetermined day during an 8-hour period at each institution. Eight hospitals required a signed informed consent before study participation; 1 hospital's institutional review board waived consent. A physical skin assessment was done on each inpatient, and all pressure ulcers found were staged according to the National Pressure Ulcer Advisory Panel staging system. A chart review was done on all subjects to collect information on patient demographics and potential risk factors. The Neonatal/Infant Braden Q Risk Assessment was scored for infants younger than 1 year old, and the Braden Q Risk Assessment for children 1 year and older. Patient data collection forms were completed, and all data were entered into the FAST data collection software at the end of the study day. Analyses of data and reports were generated from a central site. RESULTS: There were 1,064 children surveyed, with a pressure ulcer prevalence of 4.0% and other skin breakdown prevalence of 14.8%. Ninety-two percent of the pressure ulcers were partial thickness, Stages I and II. Sixty-six percent of the pressure ulcers were facility associated. Locations of pressure ulcers were predominately in the head area 31%, seat area 20%, and foot area 19%. The 3 most common types of skin breakdown were excoriation/diaper dermatitis, skin tear, and IV extravasation. Predominant locations for skin breakdown were seat area 35%, foot area 20%, and upper extremities 18%. CONCLUSIONS: The prevalence of pressure ulcers was low in the pediatric population studied, but skin breakdown prevalence (excluding pressure ulcers) was higher, with 74% of all wound types consisting of excoriation/diaper dermatitis, skin tears, and IV extravasation sites. Future studies are needed to evaluate prevention and treatment options for pressure ulcers and skin breakdown in this population. Repeating this multisite study at intervals may be beneficial to continue to build and modify the benchmark data.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/00152192-200407000-00004

Cites

20 of 20 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The global incidence of skin breakdown in hospitalized neonates ranges between 31 and 45%, with medical devices and associated adhesives being a major iatrogenic cause.

    “The global incidence of skin breakdown in hospitalized neonates ranges between 31 and 45%, with medical devices and associated adhesives being a major iatrogenic cause (3 , 7).”
  • Pressure-related skin injuries occur in 26% of hospitalized infants less than 3 months of age, with 80% directly related to medical devices, where PPG modules are the most common culprit.

    “Additionally, pressure-related skin injuries occur in 26% of hospitalized infants less than 3 months of age (7) with 80% directly related to medical devices, where PPG modules are the most common culprit (18).”
  • Textile-based sensors retain wired connections across the body, and their inability to support an intimate connection to the skin precludes reliable operation at clinical-grade levels of accuracy, particularly with motion.

    “Although textile-based sensors are of interest, these technologies retain wired connections across the body, and their inability to support an intimate connection to the skin precludes reliable operation at clinical-grade levels of accuracy, particularly with motion (5–7).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
McLane, K. M., Bookout, K., McCord, S., McCain, J., & Jefferson, L. S.
Affiliations
Baylor College of Medicine (US)
Venue
Journal of Wound, Ostomy and Continence Nursing
Published
2004-07
Volume
31
Issue
4
Pages
168-178
ISSN
1071-5754 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1999460790
Cited by
129
References
20
Citations by year
2025: 5 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 12 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 5
FWCI
6.13
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Wound Ostomy and Continence Nursing (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Occupational Therapy › Pressure Ulcer Prevention and Management
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Speech and Hearing › Neonatal skin health care
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Rehabilitation › Wound Healing and Treatments
Keywords
skin breakdown, prevalence, hospitalized children, risk factors, excoriation, diaper dermatitis, skin tears, pressure ulcer staging, children's hospitals, inter-rater reliability, neonates
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Child, Child, Preschool, Data Collection, Pressure Ulcer, Female, Humans, Infant, Infant, Newborn, Male, Nursing Assessment, Software, United States, Reproducibility of Results, Prevalence, Risk Assessment

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review