Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 467

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Efficacy of a brief case management intervention to link recently diagnosed HIV-infected persons to care

Gardner, Lytt I, Metsch, Lisa R, Anderson-Mahoney, Pamela, Loughlin, Anita M, Rio, Carlos del, Strathdee, Steffanie, Sansom, Stephanie L, Siegal, Harvey A, Greenberg, Alan E, Holmberg, Scott D·2005·AIDS

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The Antiretroviral Treatment Access Study (ARTAS) assessed a case management intervention to improve linkage to care for persons recently receiving an HIV diagnosis. METHODS: Participants were recently diagnosed HIV-infected persons in Atlanta, Baltimore, Los Angeles and Miami. They were randomized to either standard of care (SOC) passive referral or case management (CM) for linkage to nearby HIV clinics. The SOC arm received information about HIV and local care resources; the CM intervention arm included up to five contacts with a case manager over a 90-day period. The outcome measure was self-reported attendance at an HIV care clinic at least twice over a 12-month period. RESULTS: A higher proportion of the 136 case-managed participants than the 137 SOC participants visited an HIV clinician at least once within 6 months [78 versus 60%; adjusted relative risk (RR(adj)), 1.36; P = 0.0005) and at least twice within 12 months (64 versus 49%; RR(adj), 1.41; P = 0.006). Individuals older than 40 years, Hispanic participants, individuals enrolled within 6 months of an HIV-seropositive test result and participants without recent crack cocaine use were all significantly more likely to have made two visits to an HIV care provider. We estimate the cost of such case management to be 600-1200 US dollars per client. CONCLUSION: A brief intervention by a case manager was associated with a significantly higher rate of successful linkage to HIV care. Brief case management is an affordable and effective resource that can be offered to HIV-infected clients soon after their HIV diagnosis.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/01.aids.0000161772.51900.eb

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Cited by

See all 467

Metadata

Authors
Gardner, L. I., Metsch, L. R., Anderson-Mahoney, P., Loughlin, A. M., Rio, C. D., Strathdee, S., Sansom, S. L., Siegal, H. A., Greenberg, A. E., & Holmberg, S. D.
Venue
AIDS
Published
2005-03-04
Volume
19
Issue
4
Pages
423-431
ISSN
0269-9370 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2035445723
Cited by
467
References
1
FWCI
9.60
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Efficacy of a brief case management intervention to link recently diagnosed HIV-infected persons to care. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1097/01.aids.0000161772.51900.eb
The paper
Gardner, L. I., Metsch, L. R., Anderson-Mahoney, P., Loughlin, A. M., Rio, C. D., Strathdee, S., Sansom, S. L., Siegal, H. A., Greenberg, A. E., & Holmberg, S. D. (2005). Efficacy of a brief case management intervention to link recently diagnosed HIV-infected persons to care. AIDS. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.aids.0000161772.51900.eb

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.