Cited by 307Chronic Disease Management StrategiesNursing Roles and PracticesDiabetes Management and Education

Patient navigators for people with chronic disease: A systematic review

Open access
McBrien, Kerry A., Ivers, Noah, Barnieh, Lianne, Bailey, Jacob J., Lorenzetti, Diane L., Nicholas, David, Tonelli, Marcello, Hemmelgarn, Brenda +4 more·2018·PLOS ONE

Abstract

BACKGROUND: People with chronic diseases experience barriers to managing their diseases and accessing available health services. Patient navigator programs are increasingly being used to help people with chronic diseases navigate and access health services. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this review was to summarize the evidence for patient navigator programs in people with a broad range of chronic diseases, compared to usual care. METHODS: We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, CENTRAL, CINAHL, PsycINFO, and Social Work Abstracts from inception to August 23, 2017. We also searched the reference lists of included articles. We included original reports of randomized controlled trials of patient navigator programs compared to usual care for adult and pediatric patients with any one of a defined set of chronic diseases. RESULTS: From a total of 14,672 abstracts, 67 unique studies fit our inclusion criteria. Of these, 44 were in cancer, 8 in diabetes, 7 in HIV/AIDS, 4 in cardiovascular disease, 2 in chronic kidney disease, 1 in dementia and 1 in patients with more than one condition. Program characteristics varied considerably. Primary outcomes were most commonly process measures, and 45 of 67 studies reported a statistically significant improvement in the primary outcome. CONCLUSION: Our findings indicate that patient navigator programs improve processes of care, although few studies assessed patient experience, clinical outcomes or costs. The inability to definitively outline successful components remains a key uncertainty in the use of patient navigator programs across chronic diseases. Given the increasing popularity of patient navigators, future studies should use a consistent definition for patient navigation and determine which elements of this intervention are most likely to lead to improved outcomes. TRIAL REGISTRATION: PROSPERO #CRD42013005857.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1371/journal.pone.0191980

Cites

104 of 104 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Qualifications, training and time dedicated to the care navigator role vary based on the care team structure and the health system.

    “Qualifications, training and time dedicated to the care navigator role vary based on the care team structure and the health system.”

    From 2024 Alzheimer's disease facts and figures (2024) · cites this paper as [987]

    The Introduction and Results > Description of studies show that navigators have different professional backgrounds, while Results > Intervention characteristics reports wide variation in contact frequency and navigation duration. The paper does not establish that training or time dedicated to the role varies according to care-team structure or health system; navigation duration is not necessarily time dedicated to the role. The indexed passages provide no page numbers. (LLM, conf=0.83)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Care navigators, including dementia care navigators, frequently share the racial, ethnic or cultural background of those they assist, enhancing the delivery of culturally competent care and building stronger patient-navigator relationships.

    “Care navigators, including dementia care navigators, frequently share the racial, ethnic or cultural background of those they assist, enhancing the delivery of culturally competent care and building stronger patient‐navigator relationships. 983 , 987”

    From 2024 Alzheimer's disease facts and figures (2024) · cites this paper as [987]

    The Results (Intervention characteristics; page unavailable) report that 26 studies used culturally aligned navigation, which could mean a navigator shared patients’ ethnicity or other cultural factors, but could also mean tailored materials or communication. The review includes a dementia study (Results, Description of studies), but does not establish that its navigators shared patients’ backgrounds or that matching improved culturally competent care or patient–navigator relationships. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 16

  1. [32]PRESS Peer Review of Electronic Search Strategies: 2015 Guideline Explanation and Elaboration (PRESS E&E). Ottawa: 2016 January 2016. Report No.
  2. [89]Carrasquillo O, Alonzo Y, Lebron C, Ferras N, Reyes-Arrechea E, Kenya S. A randomized trial of a community health worker led intervention to improve diabetes intermediate outcomes among latino patients with poorly controlled diabetes. Journal of General Internal Medicine. 2014; 29: S13.
  3. [107]Svoren BM, Butler D, Levine BS, Anderson BJ, Laffel LMB. Reducing acute adverse outcomes in youths with type 1 diabetes: A randomized, controlled trial. Pediatrics. 2003; 112(4): 914– 22.. 14523186
  4. [108]White VM, Macvean ML, Grogan S, Este CD, Akkerman D, Ieropoli S, et al Can a tailored telephone intervention delivered by volunteers reduce the supportive care needs, anxiety and depression of people with colorectal cancer? A randomised controlled trial. Psychooncology. 2011; 21(10): 1053– 62. Epub 07/20. doi: 10.1002/pon.2019. 21769989 · DOI
  5. [109]Shaw JM, Young JM, Butow PN, Badgery-Parker T, Durcinoska I, Harrison J, et al Improving psychosocial outcomes for caregivers of people with poor prognosis gastrointestinal cancers: a randomized controlled trial (Family Connect). Supportive Care in Cancer. 2016; 24(2): 585– 95. doi: 10.1007/s00520-015-2817-3. Language: English. Entry Date: 20160804. Revision Date: 20170601. Publication Type: journal article. Journal Subset: Biomedical. 26111955 · DOI · Paper page
  6. [110]Kneipp SM, Kairalla JA, Lutz BJ, Pereira D, Hall AG, Flocks J, et al Public health nursing case management for women receiving Temporary Assistance for Needy Families: A randomized controlled trial using community-based participatory research. [References]. American Journal of Public Health. 2011;(9): 1759– 68. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2011.300210 21778474 PMC3154225 · DOI
  7. [111]Thom D, Ghorob A, Hessler D, De Vore D, Chen E, Bodenheimer T. Impact of peer health coaching on glycemic control in low-income patients with diabetes: a randomized controlled trial. Ann Fam Med. 2013; 11(2): 137– 44. doi: 10.1370/afm.1443. Language: English. Entry Date: 20130920. Revision Date: 20130920. Publication Type: journal article. 23508600 PMC3601392 · DOI
  8. [112]Carrasquillo O, Alonzo Y, Lebron C, Ferras N, Reyes-Arrechea E, Li H, et al A randomized trial of a community health worker led intervention to improve diabetes intermediate outcomes among latinos patients with poorly controlled diabetes. Journal of general internal medicine. 2014; 29(23). PubMed PMID: CN-01063665 NEW.
  9. [113]Wohl AR, Garland WH, Valencia R, Squires K, Witt MD, Kovacs A, et al A randomized trial of directly administered antiretroviral therapy and adherence case management intervention. Clinical Infectious Diseases. 2006; 42(11): 1619– 27. doi: 10.1086/503906. 16652320 · DOI
  10. [114]Lasser KE, Murillo J, Lisboa S, Casimir AN, Shah LV, Emmons KM, et al Colorectal cancer screening among ethnically diverse, low-income patients: A randomized controlled trial. Archives of Internal Medicine. 2011; 171(10): 906– 12. doi: 10.1001/archinternmed.2011.201. 21606094 · DOI
  11. [115]Percac-Lima S, Grant RW, Green AR, Ashburner JM, Gamba G, Oo S, et al A culturally tailored navigator program for colorectal cancer screening in a community health center: a randomized, controlled trial. Journal of General Internal Medicine. 2009; 24(2): 211– 7. doi: 10.1007/s11606-008-0864-x. 19067085 PMC2628981 · DOI
  12. [116]Weber BE, Reilly BM. Enhancing mammography use in the inner city. A randomized trial of intensive case management. Archives of Internal Medicine. 1997; 157(20): 2345– 9.. 9361575
  13. [117]Wohl DA, Scheyett A, Golin CE, White B, Matuszewski J, Bowling M, et al Intensive Case Management Before and After Prison Release is No More Effective Than Comprehensive Pre-Release Discharge Planning in Linking HIV-Infected Prisoners to Care: A Randomized Trial. AIDS and behavior. 2011; 15(2): 356– 64. doi: 10.1007/s10461-010-9843-4 21042930 PMC3532052 · DOI
  14. [118]Paskett E, Tatum C, Rushing J, Michielutte R, Bell R, Foley KL, et al Randomized trial of an intervention to improve mammography utilization among a triracial rural population of women. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2006; 98(17): 1226– 37. Epub 09/07. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djj333. 16954475 PMC4450352 · DOI
  15. [119]Rahm AK, Sukhanova A, Ellis J, Mouchawar J. Increasing utilization of cancer genetic counseling services using a patient navigator model. Journal of Genetic Counseling. 2007; 16(2): 171– 7. doi: 10.1007/s10897-006-9051-6 17277995 · DOI
  16. [120]Gardner LI, Metsch LR, Anderson-Mahoney P, Loughlin AM, Rio CD, Strathdee S, et al Efficacy of a brief case management intervention to link recently diagnosed HIV-infected persons to care. Aids. 2005; 19(4): 423– 31.. 15750396

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
McBrien, K. A., Ivers, N., Barnieh, L., Bailey, J. J., Lorenzetti, D. L., Nicholas, D., Tonelli, M., Hemmelgarn, B., Lewanczuk, R., Edwards, A., Braun, T., & Manns, B.
Affiliations
  • University of Calgary (CA)
  • University of Toronto (CA)
  • Alberta Health Services (CA)
Corresponding author
McBrien, Kerry A.
Venue
PLOS ONE
Published
2018-02-20
Volume
13
Issue
2
Pages
e0191980
ISSN
1932-6203 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2789835003
Cited by
307
References
104
Citations by year
2026: 24 · 2025: 45 · 2024: 39 · 2023: 45 · 2022: 47 · 2021: 48 · 2020: 36 · 2019: 20 · 2018: 3
FWCI
3.82
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • PLoS ONE (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
  • Alberta Innovates - Health Solutions
  • Canadian Diabetes Association (CA)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Chronic Disease Management Strategies
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Nursing Roles and Practices
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Education
Keywords
patient navigators, chronic disease, health care access, barriers to care, cancer, diabetes mellitus, HIV/AIDS, cardiovascular disease, chronic kidney disease, dementia, process of care, usual care comparison, intervention components
MeSH terms
Chronic Disease, Humans, Patient Navigation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review