The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Effectiveness of the Derived Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test (AUDIT-C) in Screening for Alcohol Use Disorders and Risk Drinking in the US General Population
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The three consumption questions from the Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test (AUDIT-C) are increasingly used as a screener for alcohol use disorders (AUDs) and risk drinking. METHODS: In a representative sample of US adults 18 years of age and older, AUDIT-C scores (derived from consumption questions embedded in a large national survey) were used to estimate sensitivity, specificity, and areas under receiver operator characteristic curves (AUROCs) for alcohol dependence, any AUD, and risk drinking. AUDs were defined according to DSM-IV criteria. For men, risk drinking was defined as consuming >14 drinks per week or >4 drinks in a single day at least once a month; for women, the weekly and daily limits were >7 drinks and >3 drinks, respectively. The derived AUDIT-C was evaluated among past-year drinkers (n = 26,946), within the total population (n = 43,093), in groups defined by age, sex, and race/ethnicity, and among pregnant women, persons attending an emergency room, and college students. RESULTS: For past-year drinkers, the AUROCs for the derived AUDIT-C were 0.887 for alcohol dependence, 0.860 for any AUD, and 0.966 for risk drinking. Scores were higher in the total population, 0.931, 0.917, and 0.981, respectively. The derived AUDIT-C performed slightly better in screening for dependence among women than men. Screening for risk drinking was better among men, probably because the third AUDIT-C question directly mirrors one of the definitions of risk drinking for men but not for women. Performance in pregnant women, past-year emergency room patients, and college students was on a par with performance in the general population. CONCLUSIONS: The derived AUDIT-C performs well in screening for AUDs and risk drinking. The use of variable cut points for men and women improves its sensitivity and specificity. Validation in a realistic screening situation, in which the AUDIT-C questions are asked as stand-alone and not embedded items, is a critical future step.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
SAUNDERS, J. B., AASLAND, O. G., BABOR, T. F., DE LA FUENTE, J. R., & GRANT, M. (1993) · Addiction · doi:10.1111/j.1360-0443.1993.tb02093.x · Cited by 13,597
Cited by
AUDIT‐C as a Brief Screen for Alcohol Misuse in Primary Care
Bradley, K. A., DeBenedetti, A. F., Volk, R. J., Williams, E. C., Frank, D., & Kivlahan, D. R. (2007) · Alcoholism: Clinical and Experimental Research · doi:10.1111/j.1530-0277.2007.00403.x · Cited by 1,632
The alcohol use disorders identification test: an update of research findings
Reinert, D. F., & Allen, J. P. (2007) · Alcoholism: Clinical and Experimental Research · doi:10.1111/j.1530-0277.2006.00295.x · Cited by 1,397
Alcohol and intimate partner violence: A meta-analytic review
Foran, H. M., & O'Leary, K. D. (2008) · Clinical Psychology Review · doi:10.1016/j.cpr.2008.05.001 · Cited by 766
Alcohol: Effects on Neurobehavioral Functions and the Brain
Oscar-Berman, M., & Marinković, K. (2007) · Neuropsychology Review · doi:10.1007/s11065-007-9038-6 · Cited by 619
de Meneses-Gaya, C., Zuardi, A. W., Loureiro, S. R., & Crippa, J. A. S. (2009) · Psychology & Neuroscience · doi:10.3922/j.psns.2009.1.12 · Cited by 596
“C Dependence 5 .85 .80 - - .89 Any AUD 5 .75 .84 - - .87 AUD or risk drinking 4 .86 .88 - - .95 Dawson et al., 2005b Dependence 6 .82 .80 - - -”
BackgroundMethodInfluential
Metadata
- Authors
- Dawson, D. A., Grant, B. F., Stinson, F. S., & Zhou, Y.
- Venue
- Alcoholism: Clinical & Experimental Research
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2005-05
- Volume
- 29
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 844-854
- ISSN
- 0145-6008 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2019541198
- Cited by
- 702
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 9.82
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Effectiveness of the Derived Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test (AUDIT-C) in Screening for Alcohol Use Disorders and Risk Drinking in the US General Population. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1097/01.alc.0000164374.32229.a2
- The paper
- Dawson, D. A., Grant, B. F., Stinson, F. S., & Zhou, Y. (2005). Effectiveness of the Derived Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test (AUDIT-C) in Screening for Alcohol Use Disorders and Risk Drinking in the US General Population. Alcoholism: Clinical & Experimental Research. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.alc.0000164374.32229.a2
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.