The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Preeclampsia and Risk of Cardiovascular Disease and Cancer in Later Life: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To quantify the risk of future cardiovascular diseases, cancer, and mortality after pre-eclampsia. DESIGN: Systematic review and meta-analysis. DATA SOURCES: Embase and Medline without language restrictions, including papers published between 1960 and December 2006, and hand searching of reference lists of relevant articles and reviews for additional reports. REVIEW METHODS: Prospective and retrospective cohort studies were included, providing a dataset of 3,488,160 women, with 198,252 affected by pre-eclampsia (exposure group) and 29,495 episodes of cardiovascular disease and cancer (study outcomes). RESULTS: After pre-eclampsia women have an increased risk of vascular disease. The relative risks (95% confidence intervals) for hypertension were 3.70 (2.70 to 5.05) after 14.1 years weighted mean follow-up, for ischaemic heart disease 2.16 (1.86 to 2.52) after 11.7 years, for stroke 1.81 (1.45 to 2.27) after 10.4 years, and for venous thromboembolism 1.79 (1.37 to 2.33) after 4.7 years. No increase in risk of any cancer was found (0.96, 0.73 to 1.27), including breast cancer (1.04, 0.78 to 1.39) 17 years after pre-eclampsia. Overall mortality after pre-eclampsia was increased: 1.49 (1.05 to 2.14) after 14.5 years. CONCLUSIONS: A history of pre-eclampsia should be considered when evaluating risk of cardiovascular disease in women. This association might reflect a common cause for pre-eclampsia and cardiovascular disease, or an effect of pre-eclampsia on disease development, or both. No association was found between pre-eclampsia and future cancer.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Mancia, G., Fagard, R., Narkiewicz, K., Redón, J., Zanchetti, A., Böhm, M., Christiaens, T., Cifkova, R., De Backer, G., Dominiczak, A., et al. (2013) · Journal of Hypertension · doi:10.1097/01.hjh.0000431740.32696.cc · Cited by 5,655
Diretrizes Brasileiras de Hipertensão Arterial – 2020
Barroso, W. K. S., Rodrigues, C. I. S., Bortolotto, L. A., Mota-Gomes, M. A., Brandão, A. A., Feitosa, A. D. D. M., Machado, C. A., Poli-de-Figueiredo, C. E., Amodeo, C., Mion, D., et al. (2021) · Arquivos Brasileiros de Cardiologia · doi:10.36660/abc.20201238 · Cited by 1,068
Nutrition in adolescents: physiology, metabolism, and nutritional needs
Das, J. K., Salam, R. A., Thornburg, K. L., Prentice, A. M., Campisi, S., Lassi, Z. S., Koletzko, B., & Bhutta, Z. A. (2017) · Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1111/nyas.13330 · Cited by 597
Hypertensive Disorders in Pregnancy and Subsequently Measured Cardiovascular Risk Factors
Magnussen, E. B., Vatten, L. J., Smith, G. D., & Romundstad, P. R. (2009) · Obstetrics & Gynecology · doi:10.1097/aog.0b013e3181bb0dfc · Cited by 262
Metadata
- Authors
- Bellamy, L., Casas, J. P., Hingorani, A. D., & Williams, D. J.
- Venue
- Obstetric Anesthesia Digest
- Published
- 2008-06
- Volume
- 28
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 80
- ISSN
- 0275-665X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1981364861
- Cited by
- 245
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 8.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Preeclampsia and Risk of Cardiovascular Disease and Cancer in Later Life: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1097/01.aoa.0000319790.23890.2c
- The paper
- Bellamy, L., Casas, J. P., Hingorani, A. D., & Williams, D. J. (2008). Preeclampsia and Risk of Cardiovascular Disease and Cancer in Later Life: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Obstetric Anesthesia Digest. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.aoa.0000319790.23890.2c
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.