The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Perinatal Outcome Among Singleton Infants Conceived Through Assisted Reproductive Technology in the United States
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To examine perinatal outcome among singleton infants conceived with assisted reproductive technology (ART) in the United States. METHODS: Subjects were 62,551 infants born after ART treatments performed in 1996-2000. Secular trends in low birth weight (LBW), very low birth weight (VLBW), preterm delivery, preterm LBW, and term LBW were examined. Detailed analyses were performed for 6,377 infants conceived in 2000. Observed numbers were compared with expected using a reference population from the 2000 U.S. natality file. Adjusted risk ratios were calculated. RESULTS: The proportion of ART singletons born LBW, VLBW, and term LBW decreased from 1996 to 2000. The proportion delivered preterm and preterm LBW remained stable. After adjustment for maternal age, parity, and race/ethnicity, singleton infants born after ART in 2000 had elevated risks for all outcomes in comparison with the general population of U.S. singletons: LBW standardized risk ratio 1.62 (95% confidence interval 1.49, 1.75), VLBW 1.79 (1.45, 2.12), preterm delivery 1.41 (1.32, 1.51), preterm LBW 1.74 (1.57, 1.90), and term LBW 1.39 (1.19, 1.59). Risk ratios for each outcome remained elevated after restriction to pregnancies with only 1 fetal heart or any of 7 other categories: parental infertility diagnosis of male factor, infertility diagnosis of tubal factor, conception using in vitro fertilization without intracytoplasmic sperm injection or assisted hatching, conception with intracytoplasmic sperm injection, conception in a treatment with extra embryos available, embryo culture for 3 days, and embryo culture for 5 days. CONCLUSION: Singletons born after ART remain at increased risk for adverse perinatal outcomes; however, risk for term LBW declined from 1996 to 2000, whereas preterm LBW was stable. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
COMMITTEE ON FETUS AND NEWBORN, Barfield, W. D., Papile, L.-A., Baley, J. E., Benitz, W., Cummings, J., Carlo, W. A., Kumar, P., Polin, R. A., Tan, R. C., et al. (2012) · Pediatrics · doi:10.1542/peds.2012-1999 · Cited by 959
Pinborg, A., Wennerholm, U. B., Romundstad, L. B., Loft, A., Aittomaki, K., Soderstrom-Anttila, V., Nygren, K. G., Hazekamp, J., & Bergh, C. (2013) · Human Reproduction Update · doi:10.1093/humupd/dms044 · Cited by 698
Elevated risks of pregnancy complications and adverse outcomes with increasing maternal age
Luke, B., & Brown, M. B. (2007) · Human Reproduction · doi:10.1093/humrep/del522 · Cited by 375
Leone Roberti Maggiore, U., Ferrero, S., Mangili, G., Bergamini, A., Inversetti, A., Giorgione, V., Viganò, P., & Candiani, M. (2016) · Human Reproduction Update · doi:10.1093/humupd/dmv045 · Cited by 321
Female Obesity and Infertility
Talmor, A., & Dunphy, B. (2015) · Best Practice & Research Clinical Obstetrics & Gynaecology · doi:10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2014.10.014 · Cited by 320
Metadata
- Authors
- Schieve, L. A., Ferre, C., Peterson, H. B., Macaluso, M., Reynolds, M. A., & Wright, V. C.
- Venue
- Obstetrics & Gynecology
- Published
- 2004-06
- Volume
- 103
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 1144-1153
- ISSN
- 0029-7844 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2077820765
- Cited by
- 269
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 14.82
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Perinatal Outcome Among Singleton Infants Conceived Through Assisted Reproductive Technology in the United States. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1097/01.aog.0000127037.12652.76
- The paper
- Schieve, L. A., Ferre, C., Peterson, H. B., Macaluso, M., Reynolds, M. A., & Wright, V. C. (2004). Perinatal Outcome Among Singleton Infants Conceived Through Assisted Reproductive Technology in the United States. Obstetrics & Gynecology. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.aog.0000127037.12652.76
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.