The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Gestational Weight Gain, Macrosomia, and Risk of Cesarean Birth in Nondiabetic Nulliparas
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To examine how the association between excessive weight gain and cesarean birth is modified by infant birth weight in nondiabetic women. METHODS: We designed a retrospective cohort study of singleton, term, nulliparous women with cephalic presentations delivering at a single university hospital. Subjects with diabetes were excluded. Bivariate and multivariate analyses were performed. Regression models controlled for maternal age, maternal prepregnancy body mass index, gestational age, ethnicity, smoking, birth weight, and date of delivery. RESULTS: Women gaining above Institute of Medicine guidelines were more likely to have a cesarean birth, even if birth weight was less than 4,000 g. In the multivariate analysis, women with excessive weight gain had an odds ratio of 1.40 (95% confidence interval 1.22-1.59) for cesarean birth. When absolute weight gain (total pregnancy weight gain minus birth weight and placental weight) was used in the multivariate analysis, excessive weight gain was still an independent predictor of cesarean delivery. Although macrosomia was a stronger predictor of cesarean than weight gain alone, excessive weight gain was much more common than macrosomia in our cohort. CONCLUSION: Excessive weight gain during pregnancy is an independent risk factor for cesarean birth, even when birth weight is not excessive. Other mechanisms besides macrosomia may be involved in the association between high weight gain and cesarean birth. We estimate that of the approximately 288,000 primary cesarean deliveries performed in nulliparas annually in the United States, 64,000 would be prevented if no women gained above Institute of Medicine recommendations. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: II-2
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Marques, A. H., Bjørke-Monsen, A.-L., Teixeira, A. L., & Silverman, M. N. (2015) · Brain Research · doi:10.1016/j.brainres.2014.10.051 · Cited by 166
Liu, Y., Dai, W., Dai, X., & Li, Z. (2012) · Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics · doi:10.1007/s00404-012-2403-6 · Cited by 148
Nohr, E. A., Vaeth, M., Baker, J. L., Sørensen, T. I., Olsen, J., & Rasmussen, K. M. (2009) · The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition · doi:10.3945/ajcn.2009.27919 · Cited by 128
The interrelationship between ethnicity and obesity on obstetric outcomes
Ramos, G. A., & Caughey, A. B. (2005) · American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology · doi:10.1016/j.ajog.2005.06.040 · Cited by 119
Self-citationLangford, A., Joshu, C., Chang, J. J., Myles, T., & Leet, T. (2011) · Maternal and Child Health Journal · doi:10.1007/s10995-008-0318-4 · Cited by 90
Metadata
- Authors
- Stotland, N. E., Hopkins, L. M., & Caughey, A. B.
- Venue
- Obstetrics & Gynecology
- Published
- 2004-10
- Volume
- 104
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 671-677
- ISSN
- 0029-7844 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2026043285
- Cited by
- 201
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 6.34
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Gestational Weight Gain, Macrosomia, and Risk of Cesarean Birth in Nondiabetic Nulliparas. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1097/01.aog.0000139515.97799.f6
- The paper
- Stotland, N. E., Hopkins, L. M., & Caughey, A. B. (2004). Gestational Weight Gain, Macrosomia, and Risk of Cesarean Birth in Nondiabetic Nulliparas. Obstetrics & Gynecology. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.aog.0000139515.97799.f6
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.