Cited by 65Pelvic floor disorders treatmentsUrinary Bladder and Prostate ResearchSexual function and dysfunction studies

Does Urinary Incontinence Affect Middle-Aged and Older Womenʼs Time Use and Activity Patterns?

Fultz, Nancy H., Fisher, Gwenith G., Jenkins, Kristi Rahrig·2004·Obstetrics & Gynecology

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the relationship between urinary incontinence and women's levels and hours of participation in 31 activities. METHODS: A subset of panel members from the Health and Retirement Study completed the self-administered Consumption and Activities Mail Survey questionnaire in 2001. These data were linked with Health and Retirement Study 2000 data. Analyses were limited to 2,190 female Consumption and Activities Mail Survey self-respondents born in 1947 or earlier. Logistic regression was used to predict activity participation. Linear regression was used to predict the number of hours of participation. RESULTS: The hypothesis that urinary incontinence affects women's time use and activity patterns was supported. Compared with the continent women, the incontinent women were less likely to have house cleaned, shopped, physically shown affection, or attended religious services in the recent past; and were more likely to have watched television or made music by singing or playing an instrument. Compared with continent activity participants, incontinent participants reported significantly fewer hours spent walking, communicating with friends and family by telephone or e-mail, working for pay, using a computer, and engaging in personal grooming and hygiene. CONCLUSION: These findings substantiate prior work on the relationship between urinary incontinence and quality of life, and suggest a useful route for educating patients about the impact of urinary incontinence. Clinicians must be alert to opportunities for encouraging incontinent women to be active. It is also important to consider the implications for time use and activity patterns when advising patients about treatment and management options. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: II-2.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/01.aog.0000143829.21758.3c

Cites

25 of 25 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Fultz, N. H., Fisher, G. G., & Jenkins, K. R.
Affiliations
University of Michigan (US)
Venue
Obstetrics & Gynecology
Published
2004-12
Volume
104
Issue
6
Pages
1327-1334
ISSN
0029-7844 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2079794617
Cited by
65
References
25
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 3
FWCI
2.51
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institute on Aging (U01 AG 09740, U01AG009740)
  • Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (K12HD001438, K12 HD01438)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Rheumatology › Pelvic floor disorders treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Urology › Urinary Bladder and Prostate Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Sexual function and dysfunction studies
Keywords
urinary incontinence, time use, activities and participation, middle-aged and older women, quality of life, physical activity, housework, leisure, Health and Retirement Study
MeSH terms
Aged, Female, Humans, Interpersonal Relations, Leisure Activities, Middle Aged, Quality of Life, Urinary Incontinence, Logistic Models

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review