The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Pregnancy and Neonatal Outcomes in Women With Eating Disorders
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: This study was initiated to examine pregnancy and neonatal outcomes in women with past or current eating disorders as compared with a control group. METHODS: Forty-nine nulliparous nonsmoking women previously diagnosed with eating disorders (24 anorexia nervosa, 20 bulimia nervosa, 5 eating disorders not otherwise specified) and 68 controls were recruited in early pregnancy. Data on antenatal complications, mode of delivery, and neonatal outcome variables were collected. For comparisons between groups 1-way analysis of variance or chi(2) test was used. RESULTS: Twenty-two percent of the patients had a verified relapse in eating disorders during pregnancy. Women with past or current eating disorders were at increased risk of hyperemesis (P < .01) and delivered infants with significantly lower birth weight (P < .01) and smaller head circumference (P < .001) as compared with controls. They were also at greater risk of delivering infants with microcephaly (P < .05) and small for gestational age infants (P < .05). CONCLUSION: Pregnant women with past or active eating disorders seem to be at greater risk for delivering infants with lower birth weight, smaller head circumference, microcephaly, and small for gestational age. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: II-2.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Experimental Design: Procedures for the Behavioral Sciences
Kirk, R. (2013) · doi:10.4135/9781483384733 · Cited by 8,539
Cited by
Functional Hypothalamic Amenorrhea: An Endocrine Society Clinical Practice Guideline
Gordon, C. M., Ackerman, K. E., Berga, S. L., Kaplan, J. R., Mastorakos, G., Misra, M., Murad, M. H., Santoro, N. F., & Warren, M. P. (2017) · The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism · doi:10.1210/jc.2017-00131 · Cited by 600
Silverman, J. G., Decker, M. R., Reed, E., & Raj, A. (2006) · American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology · doi:10.1016/j.ajog.2005.12.052 · Cited by 388
Current application of chemometrics in traditional Chinese herbal medicine research
Huang, Y., Wu, Z., Su, R., Ruan, G., Du, F., & Li, G. (2016) · Journal of Chromatography B · doi:10.1016/j.jchromb.2015.12.050 · Cited by 63
Metadata
- Authors
- Kouba, S., Hällström, T., Lindholm, C., & Hirschberg, A. L.
- Venue
- Obstetrics & Gynecology
- Published
- 2005-02
- Volume
- 105
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 255-260
- ISSN
- 0029-7844 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1972138248
- Cited by
- 234
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 15.79
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Pregnancy and Neonatal Outcomes in Women With Eating Disorders. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1097/01.aog.0000148265.90984.c3
- The paper
- Kouba, S., Hällström, T., Lindholm, C., & Hirschberg, A. L. (2005). Pregnancy and Neonatal Outcomes in Women With Eating Disorders. Obstetrics & Gynecology. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.aog.0000148265.90984.c3
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.