The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Diagnosis, Prevention, and Management of Eclampsia
Abstract
The pathogenesis of eclamptic convulsions remains unknown. Cerebral imaging suggests that cerebral abnormalities in eclampsia (mostly vasogenic edema) are similar to those found in hypertensive encephalopathy. However, cerebral imaging is not necessary for the diagnosis or management of most women with eclampsia. The onset of eclamptic convulsions can be antepartum (38-53%), intrapartum (18-36%), or postpartum (11-44%). Recent data reveal an increase in the proportion of women who develop eclampsia beyond 48 hours after delivery. Other than early detection of preeclampsia, there are no reliable tests or symptoms for predicting the development of eclampsia. In developed countries, the majority of cases reported in recent series are considered unpreventable. Magnesium sulfate is the drug of choice for reducing the rate of eclampsia developing intrapartum and immediately postpartum. There are 4 large randomized trials comparing magnesium sulfate with no treatment or placebo in patients with severe preeclampsia. The rate of eclampsia was significantly lower in those assigned to magnesium sulfate (0.6% versus 2.0%, relative risk 0.39, 95% confidence interval 0.28-0.55). Thus, the number of women needed to treat to prevent one case of eclampsia is 71. Magnesium sulfate is the drug of choice to prevent recurrent convulsions in eclampsia. The development of eclampsia is associated with increased risk of adverse outcome for both mother and fetus, particularly in the developing nations. Pregnancies complicated by eclampsia require a well-formulated management plan. Women with a history of eclampsia are at increased risk of eclampsia (1-2%) and preeclampsia (22-35%) in subsequent pregnancies. Recommendations for diagnosis, prevention, management, and counseling of these women are provided based on results of recent studies and my own clinical experience.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Gestational Hypertension and Preeclampsia
(2020) · Obstetrics & Gynecology · doi:10.1097/aog.0000000000003891 · Cited by 2,949
European Resuscitation Council Guidelines for Resuscitation 2005
Soar, J., Deakin, C. D., Nolan, J. P., Abbas, G., Alfonzo, A., Handley, A. J., Lockey, D., Perkins, G. D., & Thies, K. (2005) · Resuscitation · doi:10.1016/j.resuscitation.2005.10.004 · Cited by 832
European Resuscitation Council Guidelines for Resuscitation 2015
Truhlář, A., Deakin, C. D., Soar, J., Khalifa, G. E. A., Alfonzo, A., Bierens, J. J. L. M., Brattebø, G., Brugger, H., Dunning, J., Hunyadi-Antičević, S., et al. (2015) · Resuscitation · doi:10.1016/j.resuscitation.2015.07.017 · Cited by 819
Young, B. C., Levine, R. J., & Karumanchi, S. A. (2010) · Annual Review of Pathology: Mechanisms of Disease · doi:10.1146/annurev-pathol-121808-102149 · Cited by 719
Preeclampsia: The Role of Angiogenic Factors in Its Pathogenesis
Wang, A., Rana, S., & Karumanchi, S. A. (2009) · Physiology · doi:10.1152/physiol.00043.2008 · Cited by 549
Metadata
- Authors
- Sibai, B. M.
- Venue
- Obstetrics & Gynecology
- Published
- 2005-02
- Volume
- 105
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 402-410
- ISSN
- 0029-7844 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1966439717
- Cited by
- 544
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 33.69
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Diagnosis, Prevention, and Management of Eclampsia. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1097/01.aog.0000152351.13671.99
- The paper
- Sibai, B. M. (2005). Diagnosis, Prevention, and Management of Eclampsia. Obstetrics & Gynecology. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.aog.0000152351.13671.99
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.