The DOI matches its Crossref record; 34 of the 34 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Placental Abruption in Term and Preterm Gestations: Evidence for Heterogeneity in Clinical Pathways
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To estimate the magnitude of associations of acute and chronic processes with abruption in preterm and term gestations. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was performed using data on women that delivered singleton live births and stillbirths at 20 or more weeks of gestation in the United States, 1995-2002 (n = 30,378,902). Rates of 1) acute-inflammation-associated clinical conditions (premature rupture of membranes and intrauterine infection); 2) chronic processes associated with vascular dysfunction or chronic inflammation (chronic and pregnancy-induced hypertension, preexisting or gestational diabetes, small for gestational age, and maternal smoking); and 3) both acute and chronic processes, were examined among women with and without abruption. Rates were examined separately among preterm (< 37 weeks) and term births, with adjustment for confounders. Relative risk (RR) for aforementioned groups in relation to abruption was derived from multivariate logistic regression models after adjusting for potential confounders. RESULTS: At preterm gestation, the rates of acute-inflammation-associated conditions were higher among women with than without abruption (12.0% compared with 10.2%; RR 1.38, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.34-1.42). At term, acute-inflammation-associated conditions were present in 4.2% and 3.3% of births with and without abruption, respectively (RR 1.39, 95% CI 1.33-1.45). At preterm gestation, the rates of chronic processes were 43.9% and 30.0% among women with and without abruption, respectively (RR 1.87, 95% CI 1.85-1.90). At term, the corresponding rates of chronic processes were 41.0% and 22.7%, respectively (RR 2.37, 95% CI 2.34-2.41). Association between both acute and chronic processes and abruption are similar to those of acute-inflammation-associated conditions. CONCLUSION: Among women with placental abruption, conditions associated with acute inflammation are more prevalent at preterm than term gestations, whereas chronic processes are present throughout gestation. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: II-2.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“The pathophysiology of abruption includes both long-standing chronic processes and acute “triggers” as well as the interaction between the two processes (FIGURE 1) (8, 9).”
From Placental abruption at near-term and term gestations: Pathophysiology, epidemiology, diagnosis, and management (2023) · cites this paper as [9]
In the citing paper
“Risk factor assessments for term versus preterm abruption reveals significant overlap (9).”
From Placental abruption at near-term and term gestations: Pathophysiology, epidemiology, diagnosis, and management (2023) · cites this paper as [9]
In the citing paper
“In a large retrospective cohort study of over 30 million births in the US from 1995–2002 that sought to distinguish causal pathways of abruption at term versus preterm gestations, the authors found that chronic clinical processes associated with oxidative stress, vascular reactivity, and platelet activation, such as FGR and preeclampsia, were associated with increased risk for abruption across all”
From Placental abruption at near-term and term gestations: Pathophysiology, epidemiology, diagnosis, and management (2023) · cites this paper as [9]
Citations
Cites
Use and misuse of population attributable fractions
Rockhill, B., Newman, B., & Weinberg, C. (1998) · American Journal of Public Health · doi:10.2105/ajph.88.1.15 · Cited by 1,683
Kramer, M. S. (1988) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.1988.03410220090034 · Cited by 430
Placental abruption and adverse perinatal outcomes
Ananth, C. V. (1999) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.282.17.1646 · Cited by 412
Lydon‐Rochelle, M. T., Holt, V. L., Cárdenas, V., Nelson, J. C., Easterling, T. R., Gardella, C. M., & Callaghan, W. M. (2005) · American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology · doi:10.1016/j.ajog.2005.02.096 · Cited by 332
Placental abruption and perinatal mortality in the United States
Ananth, C. V., & Wilcox, A. J. (2001) · American Journal of Epidemiology · doi:10.1093/aje/153.4.332 · Cited by 311
Self-citationUnintended effects of epidural analgesia during labor: A systematic review
Lieberman, E., & O'Donoghue, C. (2002) · American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology · doi:10.1016/s0002-9378(02)70181-6 · Cited by 278
Reliability of Birth Certificate Data: A Multi-Hospital Comparison to Medical Records Information
DiGiuseppe, D. L., Aron, D. C., Ranbom, L., Harper, D. L., & Rosenthal, G. E. (2002) · Maternal and Child Health Journal · doi:10.1023/a:1019726112597 · Cited by 277
Xu, P., Alfaidy, N., & Challis, J. R. G. (2002) · The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism · doi:10.1210/jcem.87.3.8320 · Cited by 245
Immunology of term and preterm labor
Peltier, M. R. (2003) · Reproductive Biology and Endocrinology · doi:10.1186/1477-7827-1-122 · Cited by 225
Etiologic determinants of abruptio placentae
KRAMER, M., USHER, R., POLLACK, R., BOYD, M., & USHER, S. (1997) · Obstetrics & Gynecology · doi:10.1016/s0029-7844(96)00478-4 · Cited by 212
Research works printed but not linked: 3
- Voigt, 1990, Obstet Gynecol, 75, 771
- Taffel, 1982, Vital Health Stat 2, 93, 1
- Lockwood, 2002, Obstet Gynecol, 99, 333
Cited by
Sorted by citations
van den Boogaard, E., Vissenberg, R., Land, J. A., van Wely, M., van der Post, J. A. M., Goddijn, M., & Bisschop, P. H. (2011) · Human Reproduction Update · doi:10.1093/humupd/dmr024 · Cited by 528
Epidemiology of prenatal smoking and perinatal outcomes
Salihu, H. M., & Wilson, R. E. (2007) · Early Human Development · doi:10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2007.08.002 · Cited by 343
Thachil, J., & Toh, C.-H. (2009) · Blood Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.blre.2009.04.002 · Cited by 177
Recurrence of ischemic placental disease
Ananth, C. V., Peltier, M. R., Chavez, M. R., Kirby, R. S., Getahun, D., & Vintzileos, A. M. (2007) · Obstetrics & Gynecology · doi:10.1097/01.aog.0000266983.77458.71 · Cited by 177
Grantz, K. L., Shenassa, E. D., & Downes, K. L. (2017) · American Journal of Perinatology · doi:10.1055/s-0037-1599149 · Cited by 168
Metadata
- Authors
- Ananth, C. V., Getahun, D., Peltier, M. R., & Smulian, J. C.
- Affiliations
- Robert Wood Johnson University Hospital (US)
- Venue
- Obstetrics & Gynecology
- Published
- 2006-04
- Volume
- 107
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 785-792
- ISSN
- 0029-7844 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2056196232
- Cited by
- 148
- References
- 33
- Citations by year
- 2026: 6 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 13
- FWCI
- 12.30
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Obstetrics and Gynecology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (HD038902, R01HD038902)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Obstetrics and Gynecology › Pregnancy and preeclampsia studies
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Maternal and fetal healthcare
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Obstetrics and Gynecology › Preterm Birth and Chorioamnionitis
- Keywords
- placental abruption, preterm birth, term birth, acute inflammation, chronic inflammation, vascular dysfunction, premature rupture of membranes, intrauterine infection, gestational hypertension, gestational diabetes mellitus, small for gestational age, maternal smoking, risk factors
- MeSH terms
- Abruptio Placentae, Adolescent, Adult, Age Factors, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Gestational Age, Humans, Infant, Newborn, Infant, Premature, Parity, Pregnancy, Pregnancy Outcome, Retrospective Studies, United States, Cohort Studies, Prevalence, Logistic Models, Risk Assessment, Term Birth, Stillbirth, Live Birth
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review