Cited by 155Pregnancy and preeclampsia studiesMaternal and fetal healthcareReproductive System and Pregnancy

Evidence of placental abruption as a chronic process: associations with vaginal bleeding early in pregnancy and placental lesions

Ananth, Cande V., Oyelese, Yinka, Prasad, Vinay, Getahun, Darios, Smulian, John C.·2006·European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology

Abstract

Background Clinicians widely regard placental abruption as an acute event, though accumulating data point towards abruption being the end-result of chronic processes early in pregnancy, and perhaps even extending to conception. The Collaborative Perinatal Project was a prospective cohort study performed from 1959 to 1966 in the United States. Since enrolled pregnancies were managed without the biases created by modern perinatal surveillance and interventions, the natural history of disease in these data is ideal to study obstetrical complications such as placental abruption.Objective We assessed the associations versus contributions of the clinical feature of early gestational vaginal bleeding and histologic lesions (chronic and acute) with placental abruption.Study design Women enrolled in the Collaborative Perinatal Project (1959-1966) were used, restricting the analysis to those that delivered singleton births (n=46,364). Risks of placental abruption were compared between women with and without vaginal bleeding at <20 weeks gestation. We also examined the relationships between placental abruption and chronic and acute histologic lesions, including infarcts, decidual necrosis, presence of macrophages in the decidua, amnion or chorion, and neutrophil infiltration in the amnion, chorion, placental surface, and umbilical vein.Results Any episode of vaginal bleeding at <20 weeks in pregnancy conferred an increased risk of placental abruption (adjusted relative risk (RR) 1.6, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.3, 1.8). The greatest risk occurred with bleeding in both the first two trimesters (RR 3.1, 95% CI 2.3, 4.1). The presence of histologic lesions in the placenta, cord and membranes similarly carried an increased risk of placental abruption, even in the absence of vaginal bleeding. The risk of abruption was, however, highest in the presence of both histologic lesions and vaginal bleeding early in pregnancy.Conclusion Vaginal bleeding early in pregnancy and histologic lesions of the placenta, umbilical cord, and membranes are associated with increased risk of placental abruption in later pregnancy. However, the increased risk associated with placental lesions, especially chronic inflammatory lesions, even in the absence of early vaginal bleeding, suggests that prolonged inflammation may be implicated in placental abruption.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2006.01.016

Cites

21 of 21 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The pathophysiology of abruption includes both long-standing chronic processes and acute triggers as well as the interaction between the two processes.

    “The pathophysiology of abruption includes both long-standing chronic processes and acute “triggers” as well as the interaction between the two processes (FIGURE 1) (8, 9).”
  • Chronic changes predispose to abruption as well as other placentally mediated pathologies, including fetal growth restriction and preeclampsia.

    “These chronic changes predispose to abruption as well as other placentally mediated pathologies, including fetal growth restriction (FGR) and preeclampsia (12), often occurring weeks or months before the manifestations of these complications become clinically evident (8).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ananth, C. V., Oyelese, Y., Prasad, V., Getahun, D., & Smulian, J. C.
Affiliations
  • Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey (US)
  • Robert Wood Johnson University Hospital (US)
Corresponding author
Ananth, Cande V.
Venue
European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2006-09
Volume
128
Issue
1-2
Pages
15-21
ISSN
  • 0028-2243 (ISSN-L)
  • 0301-2115
OpenAlex
W2081190346
Cited by
155
References
21
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 13 · 2012: 9
FWCI
11.07
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (R01HD038902)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Obstetrics and Gynecology › Pregnancy and preeclampsia studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Maternal and fetal healthcare
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Immunology › Reproductive System and Pregnancy
Keywords
placental abruption, chronic inflammation, amniotic membrane, chorion, umbilical cord, neutrophil infiltration, Collaborative Perinatal Project, risk factors, first-trimester bleeding
MeSH terms
Abruptio Placentae, Adolescent, Adult, Chronic Disease, Decidua, Female, Humans, Inflammation, Placenta, Pregnancy, Retrospective Studies, Risk Factors, Umbilical Cord, United States, Uterine Hemorrhage, Cohort Studies

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review