The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Pregnancy Intention and Its Relationship to Birth and Maternal Outcomes
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To examine whether there are associations between pregnancy intention (intended, unwanted, mistimed, or ambivalent) and negative birth and maternal outcomes: low birth weight (less than 2,500 g), preterm delivery (fewer than 37 weeks), small for gestational age, premature labor, hypertension, and other maternal outcomes. METHODS: We analyzed data from the population-based Pregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring System, including 87,087 women who gave birth between 1996 and 1999 in 18 states. Information on pregnancy outcomes was derived from birth certificate data and a self-administered questionnaire completed postpartum. We employed SUDAAN (RTI International, Research Triangle Park, NC) for univariable and logistical regression analyses. RESULTS: In analyses controlling for demographic and behavioral factors, women with unwanted pregnancies had an increased likelihood of preterm delivery (adjusted odds ratio [OR] 1.16, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.01-1.33) and premature rupture of membranes (adjusted OR 1.37, 95% CI 1.01-1.85) compared with women with intended pregnancies. Women who were ambivalent toward their pregnancies had increased odds of delivering a low birth weight infant (adjusted OR 1.15, 95% CI 1.02-1.29); in contrast, women with mistimed pregnancies had a lower likelihood (adjusted OR 0.92, 95% CI 0.86-0.97). CONCLUSION: Pregnancy intention, specifically unwanted and ambivalent, may be an indicator of increased risk for some poor birth and maternal outcomes and should be considered in interventions aimed at improving the health of the mother and child. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Wellings, K., Jones, K. G., Mercer, C. H., Tanton, C., Clifton, S., Datta, J., Copas, A. J., Erens, B., Gibson, L. J., Macdowall, W., et al. (2013) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(13)62071-1 · Cited by 477
Intention to Become Pregnant and Low Birth Weight and Preterm Birth: A Systematic Review
Shah, P. S., Balkhair, T., Ohlsson, A., Beyene, J., Scott, F., & Frick, C. (2011) · Maternal and Child Health Journal · doi:10.1007/s10995-009-0546-2 · Cited by 342
What Causes Racial Disparities in Very Preterm Birth? A Biosocial Perspective
Kramer, M. R., & Hogue, C. R. (2009) · Epidemiologic Reviews · doi:10.1093/ajerev/mxp003 · Cited by 255
A blessing I can't afford: Factors underlying the paradox of happiness about unintended pregnancy
Aiken, A. R. A., Dillaway, C., & Mevs-Korff, N. (2015) · Social Science & Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2015.03.038 · Cited by 138
Pre-pregnancy caffeine and caffeinated beverage intake and risk of spontaneous abortion
Gaskins, A. J., Rich-Edwards, J. W., Williams, P. L., Toth, T. L., Missmer, S. A., & Chavarro, J. E. (2018) · European Journal of Nutrition · doi:10.1007/s00394-016-1301-2 · Cited by 55
Metadata
- Authors
- Mohllajee, A. P., Curtis, K. M., Morrow, B., & Marchbanks, P. A.
- Venue
- Obstetrics & Gynecology
- Published
- 2007-03
- Volume
- 109
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 678-686
- ISSN
- 0029-7844 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2000197450
- Cited by
- 295
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 10.88
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Pregnancy Intention and Its Relationship to Birth and Maternal Outcomes. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1097/01.aog.0000255666.78427.c5
- The paper
- Mohllajee, A. P., Curtis, K. M., Morrow, B., & Marchbanks, P. A. (2007). Pregnancy Intention and Its Relationship to Birth and Maternal Outcomes. Obstetrics & Gynecology. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.aog.0000255666.78427.c5
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.