The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Optimal Gestational Weight Gain for Body Mass Index Categories
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To establish optimal gestational weight gain for each maternal body mass index (BMI) category based on significant risk estimates of adverse maternal and fetal outcome. METHODS: The study population consisted of 298,648 singleton pregnancies delivered in Sweden between January 1, 1994, and December 31, 2004. The number of individuals in each weight gain class was compared with the number of individuals in all other weight gain classes in the same BMI group with regard to adverse maternal and fetal outcome. Odds ratios were calculated after suitable adjustments. RESULTS: The optimal gestational weight gain in women by prepregnancy BMI was 9-22 lb (4-10 kg) for BMI less than 20; 5-22 lb (2-10 kg) for BMI 20-24.9; less than 20 lb (less than 9 kg) for BMI 25-29.9; and less than 13 lb (less than 6 kg) for BMI of 30 or more. CONCLUSION: The gestational weight gain limits for BMI categories determined in this large population-based cohort study from Swedish Medical Registers showed that a decreased risk of adverse obstetric and neonatal outcomes was associated with lower gestational weight gain limits than was earlier recommended, especially among obese women.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Statistical Aspects of the Analysis of Data From Retrospective Studies of Disease
(1959) · JNCI: Journal of the National Cancer Institute · doi:10.1093/jnci/22.4.719 · Cited by 14,689
A quality study of a medical birth registry
Cnattingius, S., Ericson, A., Gunnarskog, J., & Källén, B. (1990) · Scandinavian Journal of Social Medicine · doi:10.1177/140349489001800209 · Cited by 972
Perinatal outcome and later implications of intrauterine growth restriction
Pallotto, E. K., & Kilbride, H. W. (2006) · Clinical Obstetrics and Gynecology · doi:10.1097/00003081-200606000-00008 · Cited by 427
Cited by
Teede, H., Deeks, A., & Moran, L. (2010) · BMC Medicine · doi:10.1186/1741-7015-8-41 · Cited by 1,565
Diet or exercise, or both, for preventing excessive weight gain in pregnancy
Muktabhant, B., Lawrie, T. A., Lumbiganon, P., & Laopaiboon, M. (2015) · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1002/14651858.cd007145.pub3 · Cited by 601
Antenatal lifestyle advice for women who are overweight or obese: LIMIT randomised trial
Dodd, J. M., Turnbull, D., McPhee, A. J., Deussen, A. R., Grivell, R. M., Yelland, L. N., Crowther, C. A., Wittert, G., Owens, J. A., Robinson, J. S., et al. (2014) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.g1285 · Cited by 482
The effect of gestational weight gain by body mass index on maternal and neonatal outcomes
Crane, J. M. G., White, J., Murphy, P., Burrage, L., & Hutchens, D. (2009) · Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Canada · doi:10.1016/s1701-2163(16)34050-6 · Cited by 363
Teede, H. J., Bailey, C., Moran, L. J., Bahri Khomami, M., Enticott, J., Ranasinha, S., Rogozińska, E., Skouteris, H., Boyle, J. A., Thangaratinam, S., et al. (2022) · JAMA Internal Medicine · doi:10.1001/jamainternmed.2021.6373 · Cited by 329
Metadata
- Authors
- Cedergren, M. I.
- Venue
- Obstetrics & Gynecology
- Published
- 2007-10
- Volume
- 110
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 759-764
- ISSN
- 0029-7844 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1993650198
- Cited by
- 249
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 19.94
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Optimal Gestational Weight Gain for Body Mass Index Categories. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1097/01.aog.0000279450.85198.b2
- The paper
- Cedergren, M. I. (2007). Optimal Gestational Weight Gain for Body Mass Index Categories. Obstetrics & Gynecology. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.aog.0000279450.85198.b2
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
