The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Quality of Life Results After 52 Weeks of Treatment With Linzagolix for Endometriosis-Associated Pain [30B]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Linzagolix is a new investigational, non-peptide, oral GnRH receptor antagonist being developed to treat endometriosis-associated pain (EAP). The EDELWEISS trial was a Phase 2b, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled, multicenter, dose-ranging trial in USA and Europe evaluating once daily oral doses of 50, 75, 100 and 200 mg taken for up to 52 weeks. Subjects randomized to placebo were crossed over to 100 mg after 12 weeks and those randomized to 200 mg were crossed over to 100 mg after 24 weeks. METHODS: IRB approval was obtained. Participants were women with surgically confirmed endometriosis and moderate to severe EAP. Assessment of EAP included dyspareunia, non-menstrual pelvic pain, dyspareunia and dyschezia symptoms. Quality of life endpoints included the difficulty of doing daily activities, Patient Global Impression of Change/Severity (PGIC/S) and Endometriosis Health Profile-30 (EHP-30). RESULTS: 327 patients were randomized and treated. Mean age was 32 years and mean BMI was 26. In the treatment groups receiving linzagolix 75 mg and above there were significant improvements compared to placebo in EAP symptoms as well as the EHP-30 domain scores, PGIC and difficulty of doing daily activities at 12 weeks. These improvements were maintained or increased after 52 weeks of treatment. CONCLUSION: Linzagolix doses of 75 to 200 mg taken once daily for 52 weeks significantly decreased EAP and improved quality of life in women with moderate to severe endometriosis-associated pain.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Response rates for overall pelvic pain, dysmenorrhea and non-menstrual pelvic pain were maintained or increased after 52 weeks of linzagolix treatment.
“Response rates for overall pelvic pain, dysmenorrhea and non-menstrual pelvic pain were maintained or increased after 52 weeks of treatment.”
From Endometriosis and Medical Therapy: From Progestogens to Progesterone Resistance to GnRH Antagonists: A Review (2021) · cites this paper as [114]
Percentages of women experiencing a reduction of ≥30% in both dysmenorrhea and non-menstrual pelvic pain at week 52 were 69.2% and 69.2% in the linzagolix 75 mg group, 69.2% and 53.8% in the 100 mg group, and 64.7% and 76.5% in the 200/100 mg group.
“Percentages of women experiencing a reduction of ≥30% in both dysmenorrhea and non-menstrual pelvic pain at week 52 were respectively 69.2% and 69.2% in the 75 mg group, 69.2% and 53.8% in the 100 mg group and 64.7 % and 76.5% in the 200/100 mg group.”
From Endometriosis and Medical Therapy: From Progestogens to Progesterone Resistance to GnRH Antagonists: A Review (2021) · cites this paper as [114]
Mean percentage (95% CI) BMD changes in the lumbar spine were −1.14 (−2.21 −0.07) at linzagolix 75 mg, −1.40 (−3.35 +0.55) at 100 mg and −2.19 (−3.59 −0.78) at 200/100 mg.
“Mean percentage (95% CI) BMD changes in the lumbar spine were −1.14 (−2.21 −0.07) at a dose of 75 mg, −1.40 (−3.35 +0.55) at a dose of 100 mg and −2.19 (−3.59 −0.78) at a dose of 200/100 mg.”
From Endometriosis and Medical Therapy: From Progestogens to Progesterone Resistance to GnRH Antagonists: A Review (2021) · cites this paper as [114]
Percentages of women with a ≥30% reduction in overall pelvic pain at week 52 were 69.2%, 53.8% and 82.4% in the linzagolix 75 mg, 100 mg and 200/100 mg groups.
“Percentages of women with a ≥30% reduction in overall pelvic pain (OPP) (primary efficacy endpoint) at week 52 were 69.2%, 53.8% and 82.4% in the 75 mg, 100 mg and 200/100 mg groups, respectively.”
From Endometriosis and Medical Therapy: From Progestogens to Progesterone Resistance to GnRH Antagonists: A Review (2021) · cites this paper as [114]
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Donnez, J., & Dolmans, M.-M. (2021) · Journal of Clinical Medicine · doi:10.3390/jcm10051085 · Cited by 182
Self-citationDababou, S., Garzon, S., Laganà, A. S., Ferrero, S., Evangelisti, G., Noventa, M., D’Alterio, M. N., Palomba, S., Uccella, S., Franchi, M. P., et al. (2021) · Expert Opinion on Investigational Drugs · doi:10.1080/13543784.2021.1957830 · Cited by 65
Donnez, J., & Dolmans, M. (2021) · International Journal of Molecular Sciences · doi:10.3390/ijms222111342 · Cited by 54
Self-citationKeam, S. J. (2022) · Drugs · doi:10.1007/s40265-022-01753-9 · Cited by 22
“The proportion of responders for overall pelvic pain, dysmenorrhoea and non-menstrual pelvic pain and the improvements in HR-QOL seen with linzagolix doses ≥ 75 mg once daily at 12 weeks were maintained at 52 weeks [28, 36].”
BackgroundMethod
Metadata
- Authors
- Bestel, E., Gotteland, J.-P., Donnez, J., Taylor, R. N., & Garner, E. I.
- Affiliations
- ObsEva (Switzerland) (CH)
- Venue
- Obstetrics & Gynecology
- Published
- 2020-05
- Volume
- 135
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 26S-27S
- ISSN
- 0029-7844 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3019197074
- Cited by
- 4
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2022: 1 · 2021: 3
- FWCI
- 0.88
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Obstetrics and Gynecology (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Reproductive Medicine › Endometriosis Research and Treatment
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Menstrual Health and Disorders
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Obstetrics and Gynecology › Ectopic Pregnancy Diagnosis and Management
- Keywords
- linzagolix, endometriosis-associated pain, GnRH antagonist, quality of life, dyspareunia, non-menstrual pelvic pain, dyschezia, dose-ranging, long-term treatment
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review