Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 183

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Broadening the Spectrum of Diseases Related to Podocin Mutations

Caridi, Gianluca, Bertelli, Roberta, Di Duca, Marco, Dagnino, Monica, Emma, Francesco, Onetti Muda, Andrea, Scolari, Francesco, Miglietti, Nunzia, Mazzucco, Gianna, Murer, Luisa, Carrea, Alba, Massella, Laura, Rizzoni, Gianfranco, Perfumo, Francesco, Ghiggeri, Gian Marco·2003·Journal of the American Society of Nephrology

Abstract

A total of 179 children with sporadic nephrotic syndrome were screened for podocin mutations: 120 with steroid resistance, and 59 with steroid dependence/frequent relapses. Fourteen steroid-resistant patients presented homozygous mutations that were associated with early onset of proteinuria and variable renal lesions, including one case with mesangial C3 deposition. Single mutations of podocin were found in four steroid-resistant and in four steroid-dependent; five patients had the same mutation (P20L). Among these, two had steroid/cyclosporin resistance, two had steroid dependence, and one responded to cyclosporin. The common variant R229Q of podocin, recently associated with late-onset focal segmental glomerulosclerosis, had an overall allelic frequency of 4.2% versus 2.5% in controls. To further define the implication of R229Q, a familial case was characterized with two nephrotic siblings presenting the association of the R229Q with A297V mutation that were inherited from healthy mother and father, respectively. Immunohistochemistry with anti-podocin antibodies revealed markedly decreased expression of the protein in their kidneys. All carriers of heterozygous coding podocin mutation or R229Q were screened for nephrin mutation that was found in heterozygosity associated with R229Q in one patient. Finally, podocin loss of heterozygosity was excluded in one heterozygous child by characterizing cDNA from dissected glomeruli. These data outline the clinical features of sporadic nephrotic syndrome due to podocin mutations (homozygous and heterozygous) in a representative population with broad phenotype, including patients with good response to drugs. The pathogenetic implication of single podocin defects per se in proteinuria must be further investigated in view of the possibility that detection of a second mutation could have been missed. A suggested alternative is the involvement of other gene(s) or factor(s).

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/01.asn.0000060578.79050.e0

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Cited by

See all 183

Metadata

Authors
Caridi, G., Bertelli, R., Di Duca, M., Dagnino, M., Emma, F., Onetti Muda, A., Scolari, F., Miglietti, N., Mazzucco, G., Murer, L., Carrea, A., Massella, L., Rizzoni, G., Perfumo, F., & Ghiggeri, G. M.
Venue
Journal of the American Society of Nephrology
Published
2003-05
Volume
14
Issue
5
Pages
1278-1286
ISSN
1046-6673 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2157895568
Cited by
183
References
1
FWCI
10.28
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Broadening the Spectrum of Diseases Related to Podocin Mutations. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1097/01.asn.0000060578.79050.e0
The paper
Caridi, G., Bertelli, R., Di Duca, M., Dagnino, M., Emma, F., Onetti Muda, A., Scolari, F., Miglietti, N., Mazzucco, G., Murer, L., Carrea, A., Massella, L., Rizzoni, G., Perfumo, F., & Ghiggeri, G. M. (2003). Broadening the Spectrum of Diseases Related to Podocin Mutations. Journal of the American Society of Nephrology. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.asn.0000060578.79050.e0

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.