Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 539

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Factors Associated with Development of Speech Perception Skills in Children Implanted by Age Five

Geers, Ann, Brenner, Chris, Davidson, Lisa·2003·Ear and Hearing

Abstract

In Brief Objective This study investigated factors contributing to speech perception outcomes in children with prelingual deafness after 4 to 7 yr of multichannel cochlear implant use. The analysis controlled for the effects of child, family and implant characteristics so that educational factors most conducive to maximum implant benefit could be identified. Design One hundred eighty-one 8- and 9-yr-old children from across the US and Canada who received a cochlear implant by age 5 were administered a battery of speech perception tests. Type and amount of educational intervention since implantation constituted the independent variables. Characteristics of the child, the family, and the implant itself constituted intervening variables. A series of multiple regression analyses determined the amount of variance in speech perception ability accounted for by the intervening variables and the amount of additional variance attributable to independent variables. Results The children achieved an average level of about 50% open-set speech perception through listening alone and almost 80% through lipreading and listening together, but with scores for individual children ranging from 0 to 100% correct. Over half of the variance in speech perception scores was predicted by characteristics of the child, family, implant and educational program. Significant predictors of good speech perception included greater nonverbal intelligence, smaller family size, longer use of the updated SPEAK/CIS processing strategy, a fully active electrode array, greater electrical dynamic range between threshold and maximum comfort level, and greater growth of loudness with increasing stimulus intensity. After the variance due to these variables was controlled, the primary rehabilitative factor associated with good speech perception skill development was educational emphasis on oral-aural communication. Conclusions Children with profound hearing loss achieved unprecedented levels of speech perception skill 4 to 7 yr after cochlear implantation. Use of an updated speech processor, such as SPEAK, contributed significantly to improved speech perception skills, even in children who were initially fitted with an earlier strategy, such as M-PEAK. In addition, the audiologist who programs the cochlear implant makes an important contribution to the child’s successful outcome with the device. A well-fitted map, as evidenced by a wide dynamic range and optimal growth of loudness characteristics, contributed substantially to the child’s ability to hear speech. Finally, the classroom communication mode used in the child’s school affects speech perception outcome. Children whose educational program emphasized dependence on speech and audition for communication were better able to use the information provided by the implant to understand speech. A variety of speech perception skills were assessed in this study of prelingually deaf 8 to 9 year olds after 4 to 7 years of using a cochlear implant: perception of specific features of vowels, consonants and suprasegmentals, perception of words in a closed set of choices, perception of words and sentences in an open set format, and the amount of enhancement provided to lipreading when audition is added. A wide range of speech perception ability was observed, with better skills seen in children with a wellprogrammed, up-to-date speech processor. Children who had used the SPEAK (as opposed to the MSP) processor the longest and had a greater number of active electrodes in their map with a wide dynamic range and those who could reliably order increases in loudness with increased stimulus intensity achieved the highest speech perception scores. After controlling for these implant characteristics, as well as other contributing factors, most of the remaining variance in speech perception outcome was due to oral classroom communication mode, with the best perceivers having received more auditory and speech emphasis in their educational program since receiving a cochlear implant.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/01.aud.0000051687.99218.0f

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 539

Metadata

Authors
Geers, A., Brenner, C., & Davidson, L.
Venue
Ear and Hearing
Published
2003-02
Volume
24
Issue
Supplement
Pages
24S-35S
ISSN
0196-0202 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1971788022
Cited by
539
References
0
FWCI
10.19
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Factors Associated with Development of Speech Perception Skills in Children Implanted by Age Five. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1097/01.aud.0000051687.99218.0f
The paper
Geers, A., Brenner, C., & Davidson, L. (2003). Factors Associated with Development of Speech Perception Skills in Children Implanted by Age Five. Ear and Hearing. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.aud.0000051687.99218.0f

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.