The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Head Shadow, Squelch, and Summation Effects in Bilateral Users of the MED-EL COMBI 40/40+ Cochlear Implant
Abstract
In Brief Objective: The aim of the study was to investigate the impact of bilateral cochlear implant use on speech perception in noise in bilateral users of the MED-EL COMBI 40/40+ cochlear implants. Design: Speech reception thresholds were measured in 21 subjects using the Oldenburg sentence test. Speech was always presented from the front. Noise was either presented from the front, from the left side, or from the right side. Each condition was measured for unilateral and bilateral implant use. Results: For three subjects, the test was too difficult to be administered. The 18 subjects from whom a complete data set could be obtained showed a significant head shadow effect and summation effect for all test conditions, whereas the squelch effect was significant for noise from the left side only. Average effect sizes were significant for all effects and amounted to 6.8 dB for the head shadow effect, 0.9 dB for the squelch effect, and 2.1 dB for the summation effect. Effect sizes were not correlated with duration of deafness. Conclusions: Bilateral cochlear implant users can at least qualitatively benefit from the effects that are known from normal-hearing subjects, that is, head shadow, summation, and squelch effect. Bilateral cochlear implantation also reduces the performance gap between cochlear implant users and normal-hearing subjects. The impact of bilateral cochlear implant use on speech perception in noise in 21 bilateral users of the MED-EL COMBI 40/40+ cochlear implants. Speech reception thresholds were measured using the Oldenburg sentence test. Speech was presented from the front. Noise was either presented from the front, or from the left side, or from the right side. Each condition was measured for unilateral and bilateral implant use. The 18 subjects from which a complete data set could be obtained showed a significant head shadow effect and summation effect for all test conditions whereas the squelch effect was significant for noise from the left side only. Average effect sizes were significant for all effects and amounted to 6.8 dB for the head shadow effect, 0.9 dB for the squelch effect, and 2.1 dB for the summation effect. Bilateral CI users can at least qualitatively benefit from the effects which are known from ‘normal hearing’ subjects, i.e., head shadow, summation, and squelch effect.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Cochlear Implants: System Design, Integration, and Evaluation
Zeng, F.-G., Rebscher, S., Harrison, W., Sun, X., & Feng, H. (2008) · IEEE Reviews in Biomedical Engineering · doi:10.1109/rbme.2008.2008250 · Cited by 878
Vermeire, K., & Van de Heyning, P. (2009) · Audiology and Neurotology · doi:10.1159/000171478 · Cited by 337
Metadata
- Authors
- Schleich, P., Nopp, P., & D’Haese, P.
- Venue
- Ear and Hearing
- Published
- 2004-06
- Volume
- 25
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 197-204
- ISSN
- 0196-0202 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2003814756
- Cited by
- 268
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 4.64
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Head Shadow, Squelch, and Summation Effects in Bilateral Users of the MED-EL COMBI 40/40+ Cochlear Implant. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1097/01.aud.0000130792.43315.97
- The paper
- Schleich, P., Nopp, P., & D’Haese, P. (2004). Head Shadow, Squelch, and Summation Effects in Bilateral Users of the MED-EL COMBI 40/40+ Cochlear Implant. Ear and Hearing. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.aud.0000130792.43315.97
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.