The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Osteoporosis: A Review
Abstract
Osteoporosis is the most common metabolic bone disorder and remains an increasingly significant problem, affecting 200 million individuals worldwide. Osteoporosis often is undertreated and underrecognized, in part because it is a clinically silent disease until it manifests in the form of fracture. Sufficient recognition of the disease and its appropriate medical and nonmedical treatment are essential. Treatments including calcium and vitamin D, the bisphosphonates, estrogen, selective estrogen receptor modulators, calcitonin, parathyroid hormone, balance and exercise training programs, and the minimally invasive spine procedures vertebroplasty and kyphoplasty comprise a comprehensive multidisciplinary approach in the treatment of osteoporosis. The data suggest that medical treatment of osteoporosis is increasing each year as physician awareness is heightened. Nonmedical treatment of osteoporosis complements the appropriate pharmacologic treatment, and these treatments should be used together to maximize outcomes for patients with osteoporosis. Fracture data for the intravenous biphosphonates and the long-term effects of the minimally-invasive spine procedures vertebroplasty and kyphoplasty have yet to be reported in the literature, but the effects on bone mineral density, and short-term results of these procedures, respectively, have been promising.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Writing Group for the Women's Health Initiative Investigators (2002) · JAMA: The Journal of the American Medical Association · doi:10.1001/jama.288.3.321 · Cited by 15,889
Neer, R. M., Arnaud, C. D., Zanchetta, J. R., Prince, R., Gaich, G. A., Reginster, J.-Y., Hodsman, A. B., Eriksen, E. F., Ish-Shalom, S., Genant, H. K., et al. (2001) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm200105103441904 · Cited by 4,602
Bone density at various sites for prediction of hip fractures
Cummings, S. R., Browner, W., Cummings, S. R., Black, D. M., Nevitt, M. C., Browner, W., Genant, H. K., Cauley, J., Ensrud, K., Scott, J., et al. (1993) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/0140-6736(93)92555-8 · Cited by 2,446
Wolf, S. L., Barnhart, H. X., Kutner, N. G., McNeely, E., Coogler, C., Xu, T., & Atlanta FICSIT Group (1996) · Journal of the American Geriatrics Society · doi:10.1111/j.1532-5415.1996.tb01432.x · Cited by 1,142
Chesnut, C. H., Silverman, S., Andriano, K., Genant, H., Gimona, A., Harris, S., Kiel, D., LeBoff, M., Maricic, M., Miller, P., et al. (2000) · The American Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1016/s0002-9343(00)00490-3 · Cited by 1,122
Cited by
DeWald, C. J., & Stanley, T. (2006) · Spine · doi:10.1097/01.brs.0000236893.65878.39 · Cited by 406
Predicting Proximal Femoral Strength Using Structural Engineering Models
Keyak, J. H., Kaneko, T. S., Tehranzadeh, J., & Skinner, H. B. (2005) · Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research · doi:10.1097/01.blo.0000164400.37905.22 · Cited by 278
Quality of life in osteoporotic patients
Rizzo, M., Tammaro, G., Guarino, A., Basso, M., Cozzolino, A., & Mariconda, M. (2022) · Orthopedic Reviews · doi:10.52965/001c.38562 · Cited by 18
Metadata
- Authors
- Lin, J. T., & Lane, J. M.
- Venue
- Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research
- Published
- 2004-08
- Volume
- 425
- Pages
- 126-134
- ISSN
- 0009-921X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4296974701
- Cited by
- 218
- References
- 6
- FWCI
- 8.98
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Osteoporosis: A Review. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1097/01.blo.0000132404.30139.f2
- The paper
- Lin, J. T., & Lane, J. M. (2004). Osteoporosis: A Review. Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.blo.0000132404.30139.f2
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.