The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Current Etiologies and Modes of Failure in Total Knee Arthroplasty Revision
Abstract
UNLABELLED: Although total knee arthroplasty is a very effective intervention and increasing in prevalence, failures do occur. We studied patients presenting for total knee arthroplasty revision to determine any modifiable causes of failure, both short and long term, and where future efforts should be directed to reduce the incidence of failure. A multicenter prospective observational cohort study of 318 consecutive patients, with minimum 1 year follow-up, undergoing total knee arthroplasty revision was performed. Associations between modes of failure were also assessed. The mean time from primary procedure to total knee arthroplasty revision was 7.9 years. Many patients (64.4%) had more than one cause of failure. Thirty-one percent of patients were early (< 2 years) failures at a mean of 11 months. These had a higher prevalence of infection, perioperative factors and comorbidities. Late failures occurred at a mean of 119.2 months. Other major causes of failure included instability (28.9%), wear (24.5%) and component loosening suggesting the importance of modifications in technique, implants and other areas. Application of these findings will ultimately reduce revision numbers through continued refinement of total knee arthroplasty practice and through further specific investigation of these modes of failure. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic study, level II-2 (prospective study). See the Guidelines for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
The Epidemiology of Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty in the United States
Bozic, K. J., Kurtz, S. M., Lau, E., Ong, K., Chiu, V., Vail, T. P., Rubash, H. E., & Berry, D. J. (2010) · Clinical Orthopaedics & Related Research · doi:10.1007/s11999-009-0945-0 · Cited by 1,245
Impact of Component Alignment and Soft Tissue Release on 2-Year Outcomes in Total Knee Arthroplasty
Vigdorchik, J. M., Wakelin, E. A., Koenig, J. A., Ponder, C. E., Plaskos, C., DeClaire, J. H., Lawrence, J. M., & Keggi, J. M. (2022) · The Journal of Arthroplasty · doi:10.1016/j.arth.2022.04.042 · Cited by 65
Metadata
- Authors
- Mulhall, K. J., Ghomrawi, H. M., Scully, S., Callaghan, J. J., & Saleh, K. J.
- Venue
- Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research
- Published
- 2006-05
- Volume
- 446
- Pages
- 45-50
- ISSN
- 0009-921X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2027946892
- Cited by
- 232
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 9.04
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Current Etiologies and Modes of Failure in Total Knee Arthroplasty Revision. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1097/01.blo.0000214421.21712.62
- The paper
- Mulhall, K. J., Ghomrawi, H. M., Scully, S., Callaghan, J. J., & Saleh, K. J. (2006). Current Etiologies and Modes of Failure in Total Knee Arthroplasty Revision. Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.blo.0000214421.21712.62
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.