Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 277

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

A Prospective, Randomized, Controlled Cervical Fusion Study Using Recombinant Human Bone Morphogenetic Protein-2 With the CORNERSTONE-SR™ Allograft Ring and the ATLANTIS™ Anterior Cervical Plate

Baskin, David S., Ryan, Patrick, Sonntag, Volker, Westmark, Richard, Widmayer, Marsha A.·2003·Spine

Abstract

STUDY DESIGN: A prospective, randomized, pilot clinical trial compared recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein-2 (rhBMP-2) with iliac crest autograft bone for the treatment of human cervical disc disease. OBJECTIVE: To examine the safety and effectiveness of using INFUSE Bone Graft (rhBMP-2 applied to an absorbable collagen sponge), as compared with an autogenous iliac crest bone graft placed inside the CORNERSTONE-SR fibular allograft, in anterior cervical discectomy and interbody fusion. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein-2 is an osteoinductive protein that induces a reliable fusion in the lumbar spine, but it has not been studied in patients with degenerative cervical disc disease. METHODS: For this study, 33 patients with degenerative cervical disc disease were randomly assigned to investigational or control groups. The investigational group received a fibular allograft (CORNERSTONE-SR Allograft Ring) with an rhBMP-2-laden collagen carrier inside the graft along with an ATLANTIS anterior cervical plate. The control group received a fibular allograft with cancellous iliac crest autograft placed inside it, along with an ATLANTIS anterior cervical plate. The patients underwent plain radiographs at 6 weeks, then at 3, 6, 12, and 24 months, and CT scans at 3 and 6 months after surgery. They also completed general health profiles and self-evaluation scales. Adverse events were evaluated for severity, duration, association with the implant, and the need for a second surgical procedure. RESULTS: All the patients evaluated had solid fusions 6, 12, and 24 months after surgery. There were no device-related adverse events. At 24 months, the investigational group had mean improvement superior to that of the control group in neck disability and arm pain scores (P < 0.03 each). CONCLUSIONS: This pilot study demonstrates the feasibility of using rhBMP-2 safely and effectively in the cervical spine.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/01.brs.0000065486.22141.ca

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 6 references

Cited by

See all 277

Metadata

Authors
Baskin, D. S., Ryan, P., Sonntag, V., Westmark, R., & Widmayer, M. A.
Venue
Spine
Published
2003-06
Volume
28
Issue
12
Pages
1219-1224
ISSN
0362-2436 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2043199083
Cited by
277
References
6
FWCI
8.15
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A Prospective, Randomized, Controlled Cervical Fusion Study Using Recombinant Human Bone Morphogenetic Protein-2 With the CORNERSTONE-SR™ Allograft Ring and the ATLANTIS™ Anterior Cervical Plate. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1097/01.brs.0000065486.22141.ca
The paper
Baskin, D. S., Ryan, P., Sonntag, V., Westmark, R., & Widmayer, M. A. (2003). A Prospective, Randomized, Controlled Cervical Fusion Study Using Recombinant Human Bone Morphogenetic Protein-2 With the CORNERSTONE-SR™ Allograft Ring and the ATLANTIS™ Anterior Cervical Plate. Spine. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.brs.0000065486.22141.ca

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.