The DOI matches its Crossref record; 191 of the 191 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Formulation, Delivery and Stability of Bone Morphogenetic Proteins for Effective Bone Regeneration
Open accessAbstract
Bone morphogenetic proteins (BMPs) are responsible for bone formation during embryogenesis and bone regeneration and remodeling. The osteoinductive action of BMPs, especially BMP-2 and BMP-7, has led to their use in a range of insurmountable treatments where intervention is required for effective bone regeneration. Introduction of BMP products to the market, however, was not without reports of multiple complications and side effects. Aiming for optimization of the therapeutic efficacy and safety, efforts have been focused on improving the delivery of BMPs to lower the administered dose, localize the protein, and prolong its retention time at the site of action. A major challenge with these efforts is that the protein stability should be maintained. With this review we attempt to shed light on how the stability of BMPs can be affected in the formulation and delivery processes. We first provide a short overview of the current standing of the complications experienced with BMP products. We then discuss the different delivery parameters studied in association with BMPs, and their influence on the efficacy and safety of BMP treatments. In particular, the literature addressing the stability of BMPs and their possible interactions with components of the delivery system as well as their sensitivity to conditions of the formulation process is reviewed. In summary, recent developments in the fields of bioengineering and biopharmaceuticals suggest that a good understanding of the relationship between the formulation/delivery conditions and the stability of growth factors such as BMPs is a prerequisite for a safe and effective treatment.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Bone: Formation by Autoinduction
Urist, M. R. (1965) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.150.3698.893 · Cited by 5,546
Hydrogels for Tissue Engineering
Lee, K. Y., & Mooney, D. J. (2001) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr000108x · Cited by 5,277
Novel Regulators of Bone Formation: Molecular Clones and Activities
Wozney, J. M., Rosen, V., Celeste, A. J., Mitsock, L. M., Whitters, M. J., Kriz, R. W., Hewick, R. M., & Wang, E. A. (1988) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.3201241 · Cited by 3,903
Biodegradation and biocompatibility of PLA and PLGA microspheres
Anderson, J. M., & Shive, M. S. (1997) · Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews · doi:10.1016/s0169-409x(97)00048-3 · Cited by 2,617
Carragee, E. J., Hurwitz, E. L., & Weiner, B. K. (2011) · The Spine Journal · doi:10.1016/j.spinee.2011.04.023 · Cited by 1,395
Chi, E. Y., Krishnan, S., Randolph, T. W., & Carpenter, J. F. (2003) · Pharmaceutical Research · doi:10.1023/a:1025771421906 · Cited by 1,379
Effects of protein aggregates: An immunologic perspective
Rosenberg, A. S. (2006) · The AAPS Journal · doi:10.1208/aapsj080359 · Cited by 1,355
Bioceramics of calcium orthophosphates
Dorozhkin, S. V. (2010) · Biomaterials · doi:10.1016/j.biomaterials.2009.11.050 · Cited by 1,338
GOVENDER, S., CSIMMA, C., GENANT, H. K., & VALENTIN-OPRAN, A. (2002) · The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery-American Volume · doi:10.2106/00004623-200212000-00001 · Cited by 1,308
Electrospun silk-BMP-2 scaffolds for bone tissue engineering
Li, C., Vepari, C., Jin, H.-J., Kim, H. J., & Kaplan, D. L. (2006) · Biomaterials · doi:10.1016/j.biomaterials.2006.01.022 · Cited by 1,140
Cited by
Ho-Shui-Ling, A., Bolander, J., Rustom, L. E., Johnson, A. W., Luyten, F. P., & Picart, C. (2018) · Biomaterials · doi:10.1016/j.biomaterials.2018.07.017 · Cited by 961
FDA-approved bone grafts and bone graft substitute devices in bone regeneration
Gillman, C. E., & Jayasuriya, A. C. (2021) · Materials Science and Engineering: C · doi:10.1016/j.msec.2021.112466 · Cited by 417
Bioactive Materials for Bone Regeneration: Biomolecules and Delivery Systems
Szwed-Georgiou, A., Płociński, P., Kupikowska-Stobba, B., Urbaniak, M. M., Rusek-Wala, P., Szustakiewicz, K., Piszko, P., Krupa, A., Biernat, M., Gazińska, M., et al. (2023) · ACS Biomaterials Science & Engineering · doi:10.1021/acsbiomaterials.3c00609 · Cited by 269
MOFs and bone: application of MOFs in bone tissue engineering and bone diseases
Li, X., Shu, X., Shi, Y., Li, H., & Pei, X. (2023) · Chinese Chemical Letters · doi:10.1016/j.cclet.2022.107986 · Cited by 65
Engineered dual affinity protein fragments to bind collagen and capture growth factors
Sarrigiannidis, S. O., Dobre, O., Navarro, A. R., Dalby, M. J., Gonzalez-Garcia, C., & Salmeron-Sanchez, M. (2023) · Materials Today Bio · doi:10.1016/j.mtbio.2023.100641 · Cited by 6
Metadata
- Authors
- El Bialy, I., Jiskoot, W., & Reza Nejadnik, M.
- Venue
- Pharmaceutical Research
- Published
- 2017-03-24
- Volume
- 34
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 1152-1170
- ISSN
- 0724-8741 (ISSN-L)
- 1573-904X
- OpenAlex
- W2598850272
- Cited by
- 257
- References
- 191
- FWCI
- 11.06
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Formulation, Delivery and Stability of Bone Morphogenetic Proteins for Effective Bone Regeneration. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1007/s11095-017-2147-x
- The paper
- El Bialy, I., Jiskoot, W., & Reza Nejadnik, M. (2017). Formulation, Delivery and Stability of Bone Morphogenetic Proteins for Effective Bone Regeneration. Pharmaceutical Research. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11095-017-2147-x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.