The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Estimates and Patterns of Direct Health Care Expenditures Among Individuals With Back Pain in the United States
Abstract
STUDY DESIGN: Secondary analysis of the 1998 Medical Expenditure Panel Survey. OBJECTIVE: To estimate total health care expenditures incurred by individuals with back pain in the United States, calculate the incremental expenditures attributable to back pain among these individuals, and describe health care expenditure patterns of individuals with back pain. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: There is a lack of updated information on health care expenditures and expenditure patterns for individuals with back pain in the United States. METHODS: This study used data from the 1998 Medical Expenditure Panel Survey, a national survey on health care utilization and expenditures. Total health care expenditures and per-capita expenditures among individuals with back pain were calculated. Multivariate regression models were used to estimate the incremental expenditures attributable to back pain. The expenditure patterns were examined by stratifying individuals with back pain by sociodemographic characteristics and medical diagnosis, and calculating per-capita expenditures for each stratum. RESULTS: In 1998, total health care expenditures incurred by individuals with back pain in the United States reached 90.7 billion dollars and total incremental expenditures attributable to back pain among these persons were approximately 26.3 billion dollars. On average, individuals with back pain incurred health care expenditures about 60% higher than individuals without back pain (3,498 dollars vs. 2,178 dollars). Among back pain individuals, at least 75% of service expenditures were attributed to those with top 25% expenditure, and per-capita expenditures were generally higher for those who were older, female, white, medically insured, or suffered from disc disorders. CONCLUSIONS: Health care expenditures for back pain in the United States in 1998 were substantial. The expenditures demonstrated wide variations among individuals with different clinical, demographic, and socioeconomic characteristics.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Chou, R., Qaseem, A., Snow, V., Casey, D., Cross, J. T., Shekelle, P., Owens, D. K., & for the Clinical Efficacy Assessment Subcommittee of the American College of Physicians and the American College of Physicians/American Pain Society Low Back Pain Guidelines Panel* (2007) · Annals of Internal Medicine · doi:10.7326/0003-4819-147-7-200710020-00006 · Cited by 2,718
Dagenais, S., Caro, J., & Haldeman, S. (2008) · The Spine Journal · doi:10.1016/j.spinee.2007.10.005 · Cited by 2,046
The epidemiology of low back pain
Hoy, D., Brooks, P., Blyth, F., & Buchbinder, R. (2010) · Best Practice & Research Clinical Rheumatology · doi:10.1016/j.berh.2010.10.002 · Cited by 2,037
Expenditures and health status among adults with back and neck problems
Martin, B. I. (2008) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.299.6.656 · Cited by 1,531
Kamper, S. J., Apeldoorn, A. T., Chiarotto, A., Smeets, R. J. E. M., Ostelo, R. W. J. G., Guzman, J., & van Tulder, M. W. (2015) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.h444 · Cited by 1,092
Metadata
- Authors
- Luo, X., Pietrobon, R., X Sun, S., Liu, G. G., & Hey, L.
- Venue
- Spine
- Published
- 2004-01
- Volume
- 29
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 79-86
- ISSN
- 0362-2436 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2016941404
- Cited by
- 840
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 11.17
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Estimates and Patterns of Direct Health Care Expenditures Among Individuals With Back Pain in the United States. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1097/01.brs.0000105527.13866.0f
- The paper
- Luo, X., Pietrobon, R., X Sun, S., Liu, G. G., & Hey, L. (2004). Estimates and Patterns of Direct Health Care Expenditures Among Individuals With Back Pain in the United States. Spine. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.brs.0000105527.13866.0f
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
