Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 209

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Two-Year Fusion Rate Equivalency Between Grafton® DBM Gel and Autograft in Posterolateral Spine Fusion: A Prospective Controlled Trial Employing a Side-by-Side Comparison in the Same Patient

Cammisa, Frank P., Lowery, Gary, Garfin, Steven R., Geisler, Fred H., Klara, Peter M., McGuire, Robert A., Sassard, Walter R., Stubbs, Harrison, Block, Jon E.·2004·Spine

Abstract

In Brief Study Design. Multicenter, prospective equivalency trial with each patient serving as his/her own control. Objectives. To compare the effectiveness of a Grafton® DBM gel composite with iliac crest autograft in posterolateral spine fusion. Summary of Background Data. While autograft remains the preferred graft material to facilitate spine fusion, the supply is limited and harvesting produces undesirable clinical consequences. Methods. A total of 120 patients underwent posterolateral spine fusion with pedicle screw fixation and bone grafting. Iliac crest autograft was implanted on one side of the spine and a Grafton® DBM/autograft composite was implanted on the contralateral side in the same patient. An independent, blinded reviewer evaluated anteroposterior and lateral flexion-extension radiographs. The fusion mass lateral to the instrumentation on each side was judged fused or not, and the mineralization of the graft was rated absent, mild, moderate, or extensive. The degree of correspondence in outcomes between sides was estimated by computing the percentage agreement and kappa statistic. Results. Nearly 70% of patients (81 of 120) provided complete 24-month radiographic studies. The bone graft mass was fused in 42 cases (52%) on the Grafton® DBMside and in 44 cases (54%) on the autograft side. The overall percentage agreement for fusion status between sides was approximately 75% (61 of 81), indicating moderately strong statistical correspondence (kappa = 0.51, P < 0.0001). Bone mineralization ratings also were similar between treated sides. Perfect agreement was realized in almost 60% of patients (48 of 81) with moderate statistical correspondence (weighted kappa = 0.54, P < 0.0001). Conclusions. Grafton® DBM can extend a smaller quantity of autograft than is normally required to achieve a solid spinal arthrodesis. Consequently, a reduced amount of harvested autograft may be required, potentially diminishing the risk and severity of donor site complications. A Grafton DBM gel composite was compared side-by-side in the same patient to autograft alone in posterolateral fusion. Percentage agreement for 24-month fusion between sides was approximately 75% (61 of 81), indicating moderately strong statistical correspondence (kappa = 0.51; P < 0.0001). Grafton DBM can extend a smaller quantity of autograft than is normally required to achieve a solid spinal arthrodesis.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/01.brs.0000116588.17129.b9

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Cited by

See all 209

Metadata

Authors
Cammisa, F. P., Lowery, G., Garfin, S. R., Geisler, F. H., Klara, P. M., McGuire, R. A., Sassard, W. R., Stubbs, H., & Block, J. E.
Venue
Spine
Published
2004-03
Volume
29
Issue
6
Pages
660-666
ISSN
0362-2436 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2039897133
Cited by
209
References
1
FWCI
6.97
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Two-Year Fusion Rate Equivalency Between Grafton® DBM Gel and Autograft in Posterolateral Spine Fusion: A Prospective Controlled Trial Employing a Side-by-Side Comparison in the Same Patient. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1097/01.brs.0000116588.17129.b9
The paper
Cammisa, F. P., Lowery, G., Garfin, S. R., Geisler, F. H., Klara, P. M., McGuire, R. A., Sassard, W. R., Stubbs, H., & Block, J. E. (2004). Two-Year Fusion Rate Equivalency Between Grafton® DBM Gel and Autograft in Posterolateral Spine Fusion: A Prospective Controlled Trial Employing a Side-by-Side Comparison in the Same Patient. Spine. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.brs.0000116588.17129.b9

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.