The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Two-Year Fusion Rate Equivalency Between Grafton® DBM Gel and Autograft in Posterolateral Spine Fusion: A Prospective Controlled Trial Employing a Side-by-Side Comparison in the Same Patient
Abstract
In Brief Study Design. Multicenter, prospective equivalency trial with each patient serving as his/her own control. Objectives. To compare the effectiveness of a Grafton® DBM gel composite with iliac crest autograft in posterolateral spine fusion. Summary of Background Data. While autograft remains the preferred graft material to facilitate spine fusion, the supply is limited and harvesting produces undesirable clinical consequences. Methods. A total of 120 patients underwent posterolateral spine fusion with pedicle screw fixation and bone grafting. Iliac crest autograft was implanted on one side of the spine and a Grafton® DBM/autograft composite was implanted on the contralateral side in the same patient. An independent, blinded reviewer evaluated anteroposterior and lateral flexion-extension radiographs. The fusion mass lateral to the instrumentation on each side was judged fused or not, and the mineralization of the graft was rated absent, mild, moderate, or extensive. The degree of correspondence in outcomes between sides was estimated by computing the percentage agreement and kappa statistic. Results. Nearly 70% of patients (81 of 120) provided complete 24-month radiographic studies. The bone graft mass was fused in 42 cases (52%) on the Grafton® DBMside and in 44 cases (54%) on the autograft side. The overall percentage agreement for fusion status between sides was approximately 75% (61 of 81), indicating moderately strong statistical correspondence (kappa = 0.51, P < 0.0001). Bone mineralization ratings also were similar between treated sides. Perfect agreement was realized in almost 60% of patients (48 of 81) with moderate statistical correspondence (weighted kappa = 0.54, P < 0.0001). Conclusions. Grafton® DBM can extend a smaller quantity of autograft than is normally required to achieve a solid spinal arthrodesis. Consequently, a reduced amount of harvested autograft may be required, potentially diminishing the risk and severity of donor site complications. A Grafton DBM gel composite was compared side-by-side in the same patient to autograft alone in posterolateral fusion. Percentage agreement for 24-month fusion between sides was approximately 75% (61 of 81), indicating moderately strong statistical correspondence (kappa = 0.51; P < 0.0001). Grafton DBM can extend a smaller quantity of autograft than is normally required to achieve a solid spinal arthrodesis.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Intention-to-Treat Analysis: Implications for Quantitative and Qualitative Research
NEWELL, D. J. (1992) · International Journal of Epidemiology · doi:10.1093/ije/21.5.837 · Cited by 715
Cited by
Fernandez de Grado, G., Keller, L., Idoux-Gillet, Y., Wagner, Q., Musset, A.-M., Benkirane-Jessel, N., Bornert, F., & Offner, D. (2018) · Journal of Tissue Engineering · doi:10.1177/2041731418776819 · Cited by 912
Baldwin, P., Li, D. J., Auston, D. A., Mir, H. S., Yoon, R. S., & Koval, K. J. (2019) · Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma · doi:10.1097/bot.0000000000001420 · Cited by 773
Demineralized bone matrix in bone repair: History and use
Gruskin, E., Doll, B. A., Futrell, F. W., Schmitz, J. P., & Hollinger, J. O. (2012) · Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.addr.2012.06.008 · Cited by 473
Metadata
- Authors
- Cammisa, F. P., Lowery, G., Garfin, S. R., Geisler, F. H., Klara, P. M., McGuire, R. A., Sassard, W. R., Stubbs, H., & Block, J. E.
- Venue
- Spine
- Published
- 2004-03
- Volume
- 29
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 660-666
- ISSN
- 0362-2436 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2039897133
- Cited by
- 209
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 6.97
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Two-Year Fusion Rate Equivalency Between Grafton® DBM Gel and Autograft in Posterolateral Spine Fusion: A Prospective Controlled Trial Employing a Side-by-Side Comparison in the Same Patient. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1097/01.brs.0000116588.17129.b9
- The paper
- Cammisa, F. P., Lowery, G., Garfin, S. R., Geisler, F. H., Klara, P. M., McGuire, R. A., Sassard, W. R., Stubbs, H., & Block, J. E. (2004). Two-Year Fusion Rate Equivalency Between Grafton® DBM Gel and Autograft in Posterolateral Spine Fusion: A Prospective Controlled Trial Employing a Side-by-Side Comparison in the Same Patient. Spine. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.brs.0000116588.17129.b9
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.