CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 299Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitationMyofascial pain diagnosis and treatmentTemporomandibular Joint Disorders

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 78 of the 80 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

A Cochrane Review of Manipulation and Mobilization for Mechanical Neck Disorders

Gross, Anita R., Hoving, Jan L., Haines, Ted A., Goldsmith, Charles H., Kay, T, Aker, Peter, Bronfort, Gert·2004·Spine
DOI 10.1097/01.brs.0000131218.35875.ed
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Study design and objectives Our systematic review of randomized trials assessed whether manipulation and mobilization relieve pain or improve function/disability, patient satisfaction, and global perceived effect in adults with mechanical neck disorders. Summary of background data Neck disorders are common, disabling, and costly. Methods Computerized bibliographic databases were searched up to March 2002. Two independent reviewers conducted study selection, data abstraction, and methodologic quality assessment. Relative risk and standardized mean differences were calculated. In the absence of heterogeneity, pooled effect measures were calculated using a random effects model. Results Of the 33 selected trials, 42% were high quality trials. Single or multiple (3-11) sessions of manipulation or mobilization showed no benefit in pain relief when assessed against placebo, control groups, or other treatments for acute/subacute/chronic mechanical neck disorders with or without headache. There was strong evidence of benefit favoring multimodal care (mobilization and/or manipulation plus exercise) over a waiting list control for pain reduction [pooled standardized mean differences -0.85 (95% CI: -1.20 to -0.50)], improvement in function [pooled SMD -0.57 (95% CI: -0.94 to -0.21)] and global perceived effect [standardized mean differences -2.73 (95% CI: -3.30 to -2.16)] for subacute/chronic mechanical neck disorders with or without headache. Conclusions Mobilization and/or manipulation…

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/01.brs.0000131218.35875.ed

Cites

78 of 78 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 80 references

Research works printed but not linked: 28

  1. Spitzer, 1987, Spine, 7, S1
  2. Olesen, 1988, Cephalgia, 8, 61
  3. Stratford, 1999, Physiotherapy Canada, &NA;, 107
  4. Vernon, 1990, J Manipulative Physiol Ther, 13, 13
  5. Cassidy, 1993, J Manipulative Physiol Ther, 16, 279
  6. Cassidy, 1992, J Manipulative Physiol Ther, 15, 570
  7. Koes, 1991, J Manipulative Physiol Ther, &NA;, 498
  8. Koes, 1993, J Manipulative Physiol Ther, 16, 211
  9. Koes, 1992, J Manipulative Physiol Ther, 15, 16
  10. Koes, 1992, Manual Ther, 1, 7
  11. David, 1998, Br J Rheum, &NA;, 118
  12. Hurwitz, 2002, Research Pract, 92, 1634
  13. Parkin-Smith, 1998, J Neuromusculoskel System, 6, 6
  14. Provinciali, 1996, Scand J Rehab Med, 28, 105
  15. Giebel, 1997, Zentralbl Chir, 122, 517
  16. Bitterli, 1977, Nervenarzt, &NA;, 259
  17. Nilsson, 1996, J Manipulative Physiol Ther, 19, 165
  18. Nilsson, 1997, J Manipulative Physiol Ther, 20, 326
  19. Nilsson, 1995, J Manipulative Physiol Ther, 18, 435
  20. Howe, 1983, J Royal Coll General Pract, 33, 574
  21. Ammer, 1990, Man Med, 28, 65
  22. Brodin, 1985, Manual Med, 2, 18
  23. Persson, 1996, J Vestib Res, 6, 439, 10.1016/S0957-4271(96)00097-3 · DOI
  24. Kogstad, 1978, Tidiskr Nor Loegeforen, 98, 845
  25. Florian, 1991, J Back Musculoskel Rehabil, 1, 55
  26. Magee, 2000, Physiother Can, 52, 111
  27. Vernon, 1995, J Manipulative Physiol Ther, 18, 611
  28. Assendelft, 1996, J Fam Pract, 42, 475

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 201–298 of 298

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Gross, A. R., Hoving, J. L., Haines, T. A., Goldsmith, C. H., Kay, T., Aker, P., & Bronfort, G.
Affiliations
  • McMaster University (CA)
  • Monash University (AU)
  • Northwestern Health Sciences University (US)
  • University of Toronto (CA)
  • Canadian Memorial Chiropractic College (CA)
Corresponding author
  • Gross, Anita R.
  • Haines, Ted A.
  • Goldsmith, Charles H.
ORCID
Venue
Spine
Publisher
Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)
Published
2004-07
Volume
29
Issue
14
Pages
1541-1548
ISSN
0362-2436 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1097/01.brs.0000131218.35875.ed
OpenAlex
W2016127346
Cited by
299
References
80
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 14 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 16 · 2014: 17 · 2013: 15 · 2012: 16
FWCI
2.15
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Spine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
  • Pure Amsterdam UMC (submittedVersion)
Funders
National Center for Complementary and Integrative Health (U01AT000170, AT 00170-05)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation › Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation › Myofascial pain diagnosis and treatment
  • Health Sciences › Dentistry › Oral Surgery › Temporomandibular Joint Disorders
Keywords
spinal manipulation, spinal mobilization, neck pain, headache, exercise therapy, multimodal care, neck function, treatment effectiveness
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Combined Modality Therapy, Exercise Therapy, Female, Headache, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Pain Measurement, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic, Treatment Outcome, Patient Satisfaction, Evidence-Based Medicine, Neck Pain, Recovery of Function, Manipulation, Spinal, Physical Therapy Modalities, Manipulation, Chiropractic

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review