The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Classification of the Normal Variation in the Sagittal Alignment of the Human Lumbar Spine and Pelvis in the Standing Position
Abstract
In Brief Study Design. A prospective radiographic study of 160 volunteers without symptoms of spinal disease was conducted. Objectives. The objective of this study was to describe, quantify, and classify common variations in the sagittal alignment of the spine, sacrum, and pelvis. Summary of Background Data. Previous publications have documented the high degree of variability in the sagittal alignment of the spine. Other studies have suggested that specific changes in alignment and the characteristics of the lumbar lordosis are responsible for degenerative changes and symptomatic back pain. Methods. In the course of this study, anteroposterior and lateral radiographs of 160 volunteers in a standardized standing position were taken. A custom computer application was used to analyze the alignment of the spine and pelvis on the lateral radiographs. A four-part classification scheme of sagittal morphology was used to classify each patient. Results. Reciprocal relationships between the orientation of the sacrum, the sacral slope, the pelvic incidence, and the characteristics of the lumbar lordosis were evident. The global lordotic curvature, lordosis tilt angle, position of the apex, and number or lordotic vertebrae were determined by the angle of the superior endplate of S1 with respect to the horizontal axis. Conclusions. Understanding the patterns of variation in sagittal alignment may help to discover the association between spinal balance and the development of degenerative changes in the spine. The lateral radiographs of 160 volunteers without spinal disease were analyzed. Common variations in the sagittal alignment of the spine, sacrum, and pelvis are described, quanti-fied, and classified with a four-part scheme of sagittal morphology. Reciprocal relationships between the pelvis and lumbar spine determine the characteristics of lumbar lordosis.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Schwab, F., Lafage, V., Boyce, R., Skalli, W., & Farcy, J.-P. (2006) · Spine · doi:10.1097/01.brs.0000248126.96737.0f · Cited by 466
Richards, K. V., Beales, D. J., Smith, A. J., O'Sullivan, P. B., & Straker, L. M. (2016) · Physical Therapy · doi:10.2522/ptj.20150660 · Cited by 85
Dolphens, M., Cagnie, B., Coorevits, P., Vanderstraeten, G., Cardon, G., Dʼhooge, R., & Danneels, L. (2012) · Spine · doi:10.1097/brs.0b013e3182408053 · Cited by 88
Arshad, R., Pan, F., Reitmaier, S., & Schmidt, H. (2019) · Journal of Biomechanics · doi:10.1016/j.jbiomech.2018.11.022 · Cited by 68
Metadata
- Authors
- Roussouly, P., Gollogly, S., Berthonnaud, E., & Dimnet, J.
- Venue
- Spine
- Published
- 2005-02
- Volume
- 30
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 346-353
- ISSN
- 0362-2436 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1996770586
- Cited by
- 1,473
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 12.65
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Classification of the Normal Variation in the Sagittal Alignment of the Human Lumbar Spine and Pelvis in the Standing Position. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1097/01.brs.0000152379.54463.65
- The paper
- Roussouly, P., Gollogly, S., Berthonnaud, E., & Dimnet, J. (2005). Classification of the Normal Variation in the Sagittal Alignment of the Human Lumbar Spine and Pelvis in the Standing Position. Spine. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.brs.0000152379.54463.65
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.